Forest Fire Vs Egotisticalghost

[Forest Fire]

So I'm not sure if this would count toward the Leaderboard or not. I guess if you're involved in it would... idk, bring it up with Striker. Any way, with that out of the way, I'm bored; so I made this. Winner gets a rep from the loser, voters get a rep.

 

Rules:
All Leaderboard SECTION rules apply.
PM the card to me.
Cards due 8/11 12:00 a.m. EST
First to 3 votes or most by 8/14 12:00 a.m. EST
If there are no votes after the deadline, next vote wins.
All voters must elaborate on their votes.
My opponent and I have the right to refuse votes, but must explain why we don't accept it.
Written cards are allowed. (Must be in written format, cards with blank pictures are not acceptable)

Challenge: Make a trap card called Maximum Extinction Virus.

Card A:

Maximum Extinction Virus
Normal Trap
Tribute 1 DARK monster with 3000 or more ATK; check your opponent's hand, all monsters they control, and destroy all those monsters with 2000 or less ATK. You cannot conduct your next Battle Phase after you activated this card; also you you cannot activate this card if you already conducted your Battle Phase.

 

Card B:

Maximum Extinction Virus
Trap
Tribute 1 DARK monster with 3000 original ATK; Your opponent must banish 3 monsters from their deck with the same type. During your End Phase(except the turn this card was sent to the graveyard): You can banish this card and declare a card type; your opponent must discard all monsters from their hand with the same type as the declared type.

[Forest Fire]

Cards are up, plz vote

[TF2_The_Scout]

I have the right to deny any votes for Forest Fire's card without explanation.

[Forest Fire]

I have the right to deny any votes for Forest Fire's card without explanation.

No you don't.

 

 

My opponent and I have the right to refuse votes, but must explain why we don't accept it.

 

[Lord Bard]

Card B,

I like it more since it brings more versatility to the plays and is basically a Type based archetype virus. Which is quite useful and even tho it has high cost I think it is a nice solution.

[Sander]

Disregard this post, I can't decide of whom to vote for.

[Forest Fire]

Card B,

I like it more since it brings more versatility to the plays and is basically a Type based archetype virus. Which is quite useful and even tho it has high cost I think it is a nice solution.

for the pure fact that you don't elaborate enough, your vote is rejected. sorry not sorry

 

Disregard this post, I can't decide of whom to vote for.

you could go card c

[AGATHODAIMON BANGTAIL COW]

This was a terrible idea. Not only does the name you have to use not fit the flavor of the two words before "Virus" starting with the same letter (Crush Card Virus, Deck Devastation Virus, etc.), but the Viruses tend to be ridiculously dumb cards.

 

Card A is a Deck Devastation Virus with a slightly larger range of things to kill (an above comment is incorrect; CCV starts at 1500 and goes up, not down EDIT: Oh, gotta disregard that comment now. Welp), but does not linger like DDV itself does. It also skips your BP. With both of those, it's a much worse version of a card that currently exists and is @3 that also costs more, just to hit monsters between 1501-2000 ATK. Hitting monsters with an ATK in that range as well as what DDV can hit is really nice, but not worth all of the disadvantages this has compared to DDV.

 

Card B is worded just so Dark Worlds can't run it (unless they run #40, which is suboptimal), and as such it's going to be more hard-pressed to find itself a home for the sake of the first effect. At first, it's a -2 just to hit the opponent's Deck, albeit in a way where the opponent is not that likely to get much use out of it (aside from a few things). For something that can't even Tribute Grapha, it's pretty underwhelming. But wait, there's the second effect, which works even if you never use it for the first effect (hello, Lightsworns/BA). Once you figure out what your opponent is running, you can get a one-sided Royal Tribute. Yes, Dolls plus off of it, and yes, so do BA, but against Decks that don't have monsters that float from this, it's still as aggravating as Royal Tribute.

 

Card C, because A is overrestricted and B is ridiculous.

[Forest Fire]

0-0-1 card c

This was a terrible idea. Not only does the name you have to use not fit the flavor of the two words before "Virus" starting with the same letter (Crush Card Virus, Deck Devastation Virus, etc.), but the Viruses tend to be ridiculously dumb cards.

his idea not mine. i would link you to the pm, but he sent me his card in it

[Flash Flyer - Sakura]

Just as a side note that CC mods [right now, being myself, Zextra and Koko] have the right to nullify votes/contestant decisions if the need arises, however our word is final.

Barring the naming format, let's see what you two have.

 

-----

Card A, like ABC mentioned, is simply a larger version of Deck Destruction Virus (essentially Tribute a boss monster, and pop most Level/Rank 4 or under drops). However, this card is only good for a single shot, and also cuts off your Battle Phase. Looking at Deck Destruction Virus, while yes, it doesn't kill a lot of things that this card does; it lingers around + kills off more stuff over the next three turns.

 

This card hits about the same field as DDV (save for some additional stuff), but also requires more of a commitment to use, and isn't as effective.

Idea of the Virus cards thus far is that they linger around for a couple of turns.

 

----

Card B is poisonous against monotype Decks (which is likely going to occur due to Archetypal things nowadays), however it requires an original 3K ATK, which limits it to mostly Extra Deck like RDA and some other stuff people don't run anymore.

 

The second effect is of concern, however. Even if you don't get the first one off (unless you Tribute off RDA or some other 3K boss), you still have access to kill your opponent's hand once you figure out what your opponent has.

 

Like I noted earlier on, most Decks (with some exceptions) are indeed monotype, so figure out their Deck strategy + declare; you more/less are guaranteed to kill something.

 

Granted, stuff like Shaddolls, Burning Abyss (BA), Dark Worlds (they can just plus off the discard + SS) and whatever else doesn't care about being discarded won't mind because they either float or WANT to be in the Graveyard, it is still a pain in the ass in every other case.

 

That, and it is still generic, even if you don't Tribute a monster to trigger. (For all we know, you can use it as discard fodder, make opponent blow this up with whatever S/T removal is on them and so on).

 

-------

In essence, I'll give my vote to Card C.

 

A isn't really that much more effective than Deck Destruction given its Tribute conditions (it is more lenient than B for the most part), even with its slightly larger field of destruction.

B won't see that first effect trigger, but is still Royal Tribute / a hand killing card for the most part, even if it is delayed.

[Spinny]

All of my points have already been covered so I don't see the point in posting another ten paragraphs.

Card C gets my vote for all of the above reasons.

[Forest Fire]

Just as a side note that CC mods [right now, being myself, Zextra and Koko] have the right to nullify votes/contestant decisions if the need arises, however our word is final.

Barring the naming format, let's see what you two have.

 

-----

Card A, like ABC mentioned, is simply a larger version of Deck Destruction Virus (essentially Tribute a boss monster, and pop most Level/Rank 4 or under drops). However, this card is only good for a single shot, and also cuts off your Battle Phase. Looking at Deck Destruction Virus, while yes, it doesn't kill a lot of things that this card does; it lingers around + kills off more stuff over the next three turns.

 

This card hits about the same field as DDV (save for some additional stuff), but also requires more of a commitment to use, and isn't as effective.

Idea of the Virus cards thus far is that they linger around for a couple of turns.

 

----

Card B is poisonous against monotype Decks (which is likely going to occur due to Archetypal things nowadays), however it requires an original 3K ATK, which limits it to mostly Extra Deck like RDA and some other stuff people don't run anymore.

 

The second effect is of concern, however. Even if you don't get the first one off (unless you Tribute off RDA or some other 3K boss), you still have access to kill your opponent's hand once you figure out what your opponent has.

 

Like I noted earlier on, most Decks (with some exceptions) are indeed monotype, so figure out their Deck strategy + declare; you more/less are guaranteed to kill something.

 

Granted, stuff like Shaddolls, Burning Abyss (BA), Dark Worlds (they can just plus off the discard + SS) and whatever else doesn't care about being discarded won't mind because they either float or WANT to be in the Graveyard, it is still a pain in the ass in every other case.

 

That, and it is still generic, even if you don't Tribute a monster to trigger. (For all we know, you can use it as discard fodder, make opponent blow this up with whatever S/T removal is on them and so on).

 

-------

In essence, I'll give my vote to Card C.

 

A isn't really that much more effective than Deck Destruction given its Tribute conditions (it is more lenient than B for the most part), even with its slightly larger field of destruction.

B won't see that first effect trigger, but is still Royal Tribute / a hand killing card for the most part, even if it is delayed.

0-0-2 card c

 

All of my points have already been covered so I don't see the point in posting another ten paragraphs.

Card C gets my vote for all of the above reasons.

and 0-0-3 card c

so it's a tie since card c wins, right?

[TF2_The_Scout]

I'll conceded to a tie, since that means I don't lose.

[Forest Fire]

I'll conceded to a tie, since that means I don't lose.

ok. i'll lock this up.