Jump to content

Vengeful Furry Flurry Fury ~ Majespecter [TCG/OCG]


Recommended Posts

vtHohhP.png

 

x2 Veiler

x2 Ogre & Rabbit

x3 Eccentric Archfiend

x3 Dracoslayer Luster Pendulum

x3 Majespecter Cat

x3 Majespecter Crow

x3 Majespecter Fox

x3 Majespecter Raccoon

x1 Majespecter Unicorn

 

x3 Majespecter Cyclone

x1 Majespecter Storm

x3 Majestic Pegasus

x1 Raigeki

x2 Terraforming

 

x3 Majespecter Tempest

x1 Majespecter Tornado

x2 Mind Crush

x1 Solemn Warning

======================

x1 CWSD
x3 Ignister Prominence, the Blasting Dracoslayer

x1 Trishula

x1 Yazi

 

x1 Castel

x1 DRXD
x1 Exciton

x1 Alucard

x1 Lightning Chidori

x1 Majester Paladin, the Soaring Dracoslayer

x1 Ragnazero

x1 Nightmare Shark

x1 Totem Bird

 

Komaeda_%2823%29.png

 

....Try saying that 3 times fast. The furries are having their revenge.

 

Anyone who has played Majespecters should know the general objective. There's no need to make obsessive power plays; only to swarm and overwhelm and search all Tempests/Cyclones until your opponent has enough of your sheet.

 

Ogre & Rabbit help a lot to get some crucial Synchros, including Trish. They're probably only good for that reason. Luster is great but it's 23 for consistency support purposes, even though it can be run @2. I only need to search Tempests to intimidate the opponent into doing much of anything, so Tornado is fine @1. Warning, and Mind Crush are to help against the Mirror. Mirror Force was viable but I wouldn't risk facing the mirror or anything else worse and floaty. Extra Deck really isn't needed at all; it's just an emergency toolbox filled with random crap.

 

CnC?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm curious as to why you maxed out Cyclone and left Tornado at one.  I would prefer a 2-2 over a 3-1 mainly due to the fact that Banishing can be alot more potent than destruction at times, even if Quick-Play Spells are the best type of Spell in the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm curious as to why you maxed out Cyclone and left Tornado at one.  I would prefer a 2-2 over a 3-1 mainly due to the fact that Banishing can be alot more potent than destruction at times, even if Quick-Play Spells are the best type of Spell in the game.

 

tumblr_inline_nrkbmuwvW81t90bzr_540.png

 

In that case, Storm would logically be a more potent card to eliminate monsters effectively without risking float effects or other conditions, even if it isn't as fast. A lot of topping builds commonly use 1 Tornado since there isn't much use for it since I'll be searching Tempests with Fox than Tornado. Though it is possible to do 2 Cyclone, and 2 Tornado, but I might as well cut down a Crow to supplement for this, and have space for more possible stuff. I've had no conflicts with Cyclone and my opponent's card effects so far; it's just a simple means of destruction that Majespecter needs to get across.

No miyabi?

 

That was a consideration, but even if returning to the deck can be more powerful than banishment, I don't really need it. There hasn't been any dire situation where I could possibly get out of a pinch by using Miyabi. Using my Specters for Storm or Tempest would be fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...