Jump to content

[Traditional] Dragon Rulers


Recommended Posts

lHLKv6U.png

 

1 Blaster, Dragon Ruler of Infernos
1 Burner, Dragon Ruler of Sparks
1 Chaos Emperor Dragon - Envoy of the End
1 Debris Dragon
1 Eclipse Wyvern
3 Effect Veiler
1 Influence Dragon
1 Lightning, Dragon Ruler of Drafts
3 Maxx "C"
1 Mythic Tree Dragon
1 Mythic Water Dragon
1 Reactan, Dragon Ruler of Pebbles
1 Red-Eyes Darkness Metal Dragon
1 Redox, Dragon Ruler of Boulders
1 Stream, Dragon Ruler of Droplets
1 Tempest, Dragon Ruler of Storms
1 Tidal, Dragon Ruler of Waterfalls
 
1 Card Destruction
1 Cards of Safe Return
1 Confiscation
1 Dragon Ravine
1 Future Fusion
1 Grand Trunade
1 Gold Sarcophagus
1 Graceful Charity
1 Harpie's Feather Duster
1 Heavy Storm
1 Monster Reborn
1 Painful Choice
1 Pot of Greed
1 Premature Burial
1 Raigeki
1 Snatch Steal
1 Super Rejuvenation
1 The Forceful Sentry
 
1 Royal Oppression
 
1 Five-Headed Dragon
1 Black Rose Dragon
1 Clear Wing Synchro Dragon
1 Crimson Blader
1 Star Eater
1 Stardust Spark Dragon
1 Trishula, Dragon of the Ice Barrier
1 Divine Dragon Knight Felgrand
1 Lavalval Chain
1 Mecha Phantom Beast: Dracossack
1 Number 11: Big Eye
1 Number 62: Galaxy-Eyes Prime Photon Dragon
1 Number 74: Master of Blades
2 Number 95: Galaxy-Eyes Dark Matter Dragon
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure, but you're telling me to play a completly different variant. I'd argue Dark Matter is actually really strong even just for its banishing effect. You can summon 2 Dark Matters in one turn, making your opponent banish 6 cards from their deck. In a format where every single card counts, that's a really huge thing. Sure, it's worse against Rulers themselves/decks that run Dimension Fusion, but that's just variance and nature of the format.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Um...what do you mean by listing those? Playing them in place of Mythics? I mean sure, that's an option. iHop is playing plain Rulers without DMD and it's working well, but so is this for me. I don't think either version is really superior to the other. This version runs an actual direct wincon in form of 95, and regular Rulers can play more power cards like you just brought up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Um...what do you mean by listing those? Playing them in place of Mythics? I mean sure, that's an option. iHop is playing plain Rulers without DMD and it's working well, but so is this for me. I don't think either version is really superior to the other. This version runs an actual direct wincon in form of 95, and regular Rulers can play more power cards like you just brought up.

Pretty much replace the mythics.

 

Um but the Azure build should work regardless. Are you sure you can't cut anything in the extra for it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I honestly don't run any of the "staples" like Confes or Sentry, T1 LaDD and grave dumping is the key of my deck.

Which stuff like Veiler, Skull Meister etc. promptly stop. Sorry but this is just idiotic. There is a reason why direct discard is considered to be the most powerful mechanic in many card games. Being able to take out your opponent's threat before it appears OR remove their response to your plays is amazing, especially if there is no stupid cost attached to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which stuff like Veiler, Skull Meister etc. promptly stop. Sorry but this is just idiotic. There is a reason why direct discard is considered to be the most powerful mechanic in many card games. Being able to take out your opponent's threat before it appears OR remove their response to your plays is amazing, especially if there is no stupid cost attached to it.

Rulers don't care if you send them to the grave. Veiler won't stop anything on your (as in you're stareing down a LaDD) turn, which is when it mainly matters. You want to give your rulers fuel and have backrow destruciton.

 

So the "Staples"

 

HFD

Heavy

Trunade

Raigeki

PC

POG

Charity

 

FuFu, Ravine, Dim Fu, Return and Rejuv are your deck selective techs. I mean it's fine if you don't like it mate, it seems to work. DMD is just a bad idea

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, but I can't take your argument seriously when you're trying to argue Confiscation/Forceful Sentry isn't good.

 

Rulers don't care if they're sent to grave. How does that relate to my argument? And ok, Veiler won't. But Maxx C? Skull Meister? D.D. Crow even? There is a lot your opponent can do to stop you. If you assume they will never have nothing, it won't ever work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, but I can't take your argument seriously when you're trying to argue Confiscation/Forceful Sentry isn't good.

 

Rulers don't care if they're sent to grave. How does that relate to my argument? And ok, Veiler won't. But Maxx C? Skull Meister? D.D. Crow even? There is a lot your opponent can do to stop you. If you assume they will never have nothing, it won't ever work.

I never once said they aren't good. I'm saying they are not the staples you are looking for. But by all means do w/e you want. 

 

I don't think you understand how efficient stardust locking a Imperial order is. I mean first it was you being stubborn about DMD and now this. 

 

Surely it's not to hard for it to get it into your brain that Dragons fuel the rulers not Spells. You can cock block the opponent all you want, but if you cannot fuel your rulers you might as well not play rulers. Stuffing your deck full of Spells "cause staple" is a terrible god damn idea.

 

The ONLY spells you should put in Rulers are

 

1) Revival (Grave and Banish)

2) Draw Power

3) Mill Power

4) Back Row Destruction

 

LaDD might not that great of an Idea. I'll concede that point to you. My updated deck, and I know you're going to laugh at this, runs the Blue eyes Trade in engine for the sheer magnitude of Draw power. When I get imperial order+a stardust, you better have trunade with your spell stuffed deck. This is completely ignoring all the other floodgates one can run.

 

The bottomline is you cannot help someone who is thickheaded, stubborn, and doesn't want help

 

Card Destruction. Why would you ever run that piece of trash? I mean on the off chance you have rejuv maybe, but even then, if you insist on stuffing spells into your deck might as well not. You don't want to advance your opponent's game. With rulers at 1, its either a sign of desperation or stupidity. In this case I'm pretty sure I know which of those two it is

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...