Spinny Posted June 10, 2015 Report Share Posted June 10, 2015 Hi guys, [spoiler= V1] [/spoiler] CnC please ! ^^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DuelSpectre Posted June 10, 2015 Report Share Posted June 10, 2015 So many Traditional Format Decks O_O... Snatch Steal? Pot of Avarice? Also, should most likely run Upstart Goblins just because. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Progenitor Posted June 10, 2015 Report Share Posted June 10, 2015 Traditional format and you DONT run Wind-up Carrier? That easy as shit loop with hunter is what got the thing banned. Granted I don't think the loop is easily possible with only 1 carrier Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spinny Posted June 10, 2015 Author Report Share Posted June 10, 2015 So many Traditional Format Decks O_O... Snatch Steal? Pot of Avarice? Also, should most likely run Upstart Goblins just because. The deck cant dish out damage fast enough to warrant upstart, look at the attack stats of them. They also revolve around R3's, so not much attack there either. Pot of Avarice is already in there. Snatch steal is an inferior Change of Heart. Traditional format and you DONT run Wind-up Carrier? That easy as shit loop with hunter is what got the thing banned. Granted I don't think the loop is easily possible with only 1 carrier Carrier is the R3 right? It's in there. dont worry. GASP. I FORGOT PREMATURE BURIAL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VampireofDarkness Posted June 10, 2015 Report Share Posted June 10, 2015 Traditional format and you DONT run Wind-up Carrier? He runs 1 actually. I played against this. That being said, I think the Traps can be removed since they generally are too slow for traditional, especially G1. More hand destruction, Snatch Steal, Premature and stuff like that seems the way to go Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(GigaDrillBreaker) Posted June 10, 2015 Report Share Posted June 10, 2015 I personally prefer The Forceful Sentry over Delinquent Duo. Even though it is a 1-for-1, it ability to snipe hand traps stops Maxx "C" and Veiler from ruining your day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spinny Posted June 10, 2015 Author Report Share Posted June 10, 2015 He runs 1 actually. I played against this. That being said, I think the Traps can be removed since they generally are too slow for traditional, especially G1. More hand destruction, Snatch Steal, Premature and stuff like that seems the way to go Yeah, i agree. Although, ill keep stuff like Solemn Judgement, but the Zen trap can definitely go. Time seal can go too, maybe not Ultimate offering just because it is a win-condition just like rescue cat in some senses.Updated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CLG Klavier Posted June 10, 2015 Report Share Posted June 10, 2015 Delinquent Duo is actually quite underwhelming, I'd rather keep it in the side. It is a +1 in the end in a way, but the fact that your opponent gets to choose 1 of the cards might heavily bite you in the ass if they discard something that floats, or you might just end up setting up a grave play for them next turn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DuelSpectre Posted June 10, 2015 Report Share Posted June 10, 2015 Why no Trap Dustshoot? Wasn't that card like one of the best traps back in the day? EDIT: nvm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted June 10, 2015 Report Share Posted June 10, 2015 Traditional format and you DONT run Wind-up Carrier? That easy as shit loop with hunter is what got the thing banned.Granted I don't think the loop is easily possible with only 1 carrierFTR, no it's not.It got limnited because of the loop, but did not get it banned. It was banned because wind-up was a fucking ridiculous deck, and it was the main enabler that wasn't Magician, who was later limited. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.