宇佐見 蓮子@C94 Posted May 3, 2015 Report Share Posted May 3, 2015 Flower Goddess of Reincarnation, Arboros Plant/Fusion/Effect Lv10/3000/2100 2 Synchro Monsters whose total levels are 10 or more Can only be Fusion Summoned by banishing the above Fusion Materials you control. (You do not use "Polymerization") When this card is Fusion Summoned: Return all Banished cards to their owner's graveyards. Once per turn: You can Special Summon 1 Plant-type monster from your graveyard, and if you do, its level becomes 7. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lecc_XD Posted May 3, 2015 Report Share Posted May 3, 2015 Free summon is always wrong, and more if it doesnt have OPT clause, and even more if that summon can be Lonefire Blossom... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VampireofDarkness Posted May 3, 2015 Report Share Posted May 3, 2015 I feel really disappointed in how crazy this is. Even Gigaplant requires more effort than this card. It's easy af to get the requirements in Plant Synchro nowadays, and pulling out an even more extensive field for it is bonkers. Even more so, it becomes Level 7, so if you have the field for it you can make Big Eye, Dracossac, or the Rank 7 Sylvan Xyz. No offense, but I feel like this card was literally designed to break things cause it just has so much obviously bad points with it that it's just gave palm worthy. I sincerely hope this does not enter the tournament pool, as you have so many other more healthy options and this is just not close to them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
宇佐見 蓮子@C94 Posted May 3, 2015 Author Report Share Posted May 3, 2015 I feel really disappointed in how crazy this is. Even Gigaplant requires more effort than this card. It's easy af to get the requirements in Plant Synchro nowadays, and pulling out an even more extensive field for it is bonkers. Even more so, it becomes Level 7, so if you have the field for it you can make Big Eye, Dracossac, or the Rank 7 Sylvan Xyz. No offense, but I feel like this card was literally designed to break things cause it just has so much obviously bad points with it that it's just gave palm worthy. I sincerely hope this does not enter the tournament pool, as you have so many other more healthy options and this is just not close to them Nope, it's not gonna be in the tourney. Don't worry, it'll be substantially nerfed before you ever come across it. The idea is to make a boss for Plants that isn't part of the Stardust Line, so yeah. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cirrus Posted May 3, 2015 Report Share Posted May 3, 2015 ... Since when did Plants need a boss monster? Isn't Sylvan the new face of Plants? If you mean Plant Synchro, they've never particularly dedicated themselves to Stardust either ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
宇佐見 蓮子@C94 Posted May 3, 2015 Author Report Share Posted May 3, 2015 ... Since when did Plants need a boss monster? Isn't Sylvan the new face of Plants? If you mean Plant Synchro, they've never particularly dedicated themselves to Stardust either ... Well, this actually accompanies a new Plant-based archetype I have in the works. Plant Synchro tend to go for SSD/SQD from what I remember. Back in... 2013? Maybe 2012, not too sure either. Also no clue what Sylvans are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lecc_XD Posted May 3, 2015 Report Share Posted May 3, 2015 Sylvans are a Yugioh Archtype that focus on summon or activate their effects Excavating cards from the top (revealing cards from the top of your deck) and send the plants to graveyard Your should check them, is a good Archtype and was pretty strong and fast, but idk why it never was TopTier deck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cirrus Posted May 3, 2015 Report Share Posted May 3, 2015 Well, this actually accompanies a new Plant-based archetype I have in the works. Plant Synchro tend to go for SSD/SQD from what I remember. Back in... 2013? Maybe 2012, not too sure either. Also no clue what Sylvans are.This is because Librarian -> Formula = draw 2, +1 for each other Synchro. Shooting Star and Shooting Quasar were the optimal "boss monster" targets because they had protection / negation clauses respectively. Plants aren't particularly attached to them - definitely not as much as they are even to Black Rose - except in their role as possibly the most optimal topend for Synchro chains. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nickredace Posted May 3, 2015 Report Share Posted May 3, 2015 This card would be able to summon the monsters that were used to summon it, what is the point of banishing them if they are gonna be returned to the graveyard anyway? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(GigaDrillBreaker) Posted May 3, 2015 Report Share Posted May 3, 2015 Here is the issue with this card: it isn't a boss. It is yet another enabler, which plants have plenty of. Pulling a lonefire every turn (on top of the lonefires being pulled by gigaplants) is no effect to be laughed at. It potentially breaks them completely, without really adding any further depth to plant synchro. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
宇佐見 蓮子@C94 Posted May 3, 2015 Author Report Share Posted May 3, 2015 Here is the issue with this card: it isn't a boss. It is yet another enabler, which plants have plenty of. Pulling a lonefire every turn (on top of the lonefires being pulled by gigaplants) is no effect to be laughed at. It potentially breaks them completely, without really adding any further depth to plant synchro.Nope, it's not gonna be in the tourney. Don't worry, it'll be substantially nerfed before you ever come across it. The idea is to make a boss for Plants that isn't part of the Stardust Line, so yeah. card'll be changed. no need to even get worked up about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(GigaDrillBreaker) Posted May 3, 2015 Report Share Posted May 3, 2015 If you didn't want feedback, why did you post it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
宇佐見 蓮子@C94 Posted May 3, 2015 Author Report Share Posted May 3, 2015 If you didn't want feedback, why did you post it? Because i already got the feedback I need, I already know what's wrong with it, I'm already in the process of fixing it, and all you really did was say how broken it is without really giving any outs? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.