Progenitor Posted May 2, 2015 Report Share Posted May 2, 2015 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mJD8sV1-6g8 Personally I would find room for more absorb fusions. You need to start with brilliant fusion and Gem-Knight fusion in order to have any sort of potential OTK. What do you guys think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cosmo. Posted May 2, 2015 Report Share Posted May 2, 2015 Yep, totally gonna build this, i love Gem-Knights, and it's just to "bejewel" my opponents to death Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(GigaDrillBreaker) Posted May 2, 2015 Report Share Posted May 2, 2015 Running both denko and triple mst feels a bit silly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CLG Klavier Posted May 2, 2015 Report Share Posted May 2, 2015 2 Denko 3 MST 1 Galaxy Cyclone Cut 1 of those to get to 40 cards and then cut 2 more for Absorb Fusions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Progenitor Posted May 2, 2015 Author Report Share Posted May 2, 2015 That's what I was thinking. I guess Kog just REEEEEAAALLLLYYY didn't like backrow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CLG Klavier Posted May 2, 2015 Report Share Posted May 2, 2015 TBH I'd cut the Instant Fusion and other combo crap out. It dilutes the deck way too much and removes consistency in favor of occasional OTKs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Progenitor Posted May 2, 2015 Author Report Share Posted May 2, 2015 I can actually see why instant fusions are there. If you don't open with GK Fusion, you NEED to make Lavalval Chain as fast as possible. Otherwise your deck falls apart. Absorb fusion basically serves the same role as Lavalval chain, but with chain you actually get a monster out. It might be smart to cut 1 Instant and add 1 Absorb. I can understand the backrow hate but I think Galaxy cyclone is a bit overkill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Progenitor Posted May 2, 2015 Author Report Share Posted May 2, 2015 Just realized that Instant Fusion not only gets Noden, but also gets Lapis Lazuli and Seraphinite. It's actually ridiculous in this deck. This duel, I went second and opened with 3 Garnets, 2 Instant Fusions, and Galaxy Cyclone. Made chain sacrificing my Noden and dumped GK fusion. Next turn I drew Brilliant Fusion. The end result of the combo was: Thats 14200 damage Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premier Alexander Romanov Posted May 3, 2015 Report Share Posted May 3, 2015 All praise Lord Kogarasho! But yes, I might make this deck myself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Progenitor Posted May 3, 2015 Author Report Share Posted May 3, 2015 On salvation. This was turn 2. And I went second. So with my opening hand, I made this field. Including Lapis's Burn for 2500, thats 14750 points of damage on turn 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bringerofcake Posted May 3, 2015 Report Share Posted May 3, 2015 have the tourmalines been too much of an issue, and how about that single lapis? has that been a problem with some of your plays? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Progenitor Posted May 3, 2015 Author Report Share Posted May 3, 2015 Not at all. It's never been cloggy once. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cardffreakxx Posted May 5, 2015 Report Share Posted May 5, 2015 can you explain the Performage usage? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cosmo. Posted May 5, 2015 Report Share Posted May 5, 2015 can you explain the Performage usage? It can special summon itself from the graveyard at the cost of taking some damage, used mostly for Xyzs i think Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spinny Posted May 5, 2015 Report Share Posted May 5, 2015 What the hell do you actually use tricklown for? Crap I missed seraphinite. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.