CrabHelmet Posted March 31, 2008 Report Share Posted March 31, 2008 This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. This card cannot be Special Summoned except by Tributing 1 "Jinzo". Trap Cards cannot be activated and the effects of all face-up Trap Cards are negated. Once per turn' date=' you can destroy all face-up Trap Cards on the field. Inflict 300 damage to your opponent for every card destroyed by this effect.[/quote'] I will run 3 copies of this card in a single deck. Discuss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gravitize Me Cap'n! Posted March 31, 2008 Report Share Posted March 31, 2008 ****ing badass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShinobiDark72 Posted March 31, 2008 Report Share Posted March 31, 2008 ZOMG He's the New Jinzo!!!! He's going to be limited faster than Jinzo was originally banned. And to agree with above, yes, He is very f**king badass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted March 31, 2008 Author Report Share Posted March 31, 2008 He's going to be limited faster than Jinzo was originally banned. State your reasoning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b7hamma Posted March 31, 2008 Report Share Posted March 31, 2008 I need a list of continuous traps that have an effect when destroyed. NAOW! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShinobiDark72 Posted March 31, 2008 Report Share Posted March 31, 2008 Scratch that, He's just a slightly better Jinzo, and He wreaks of awesome,. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orochi Posted March 31, 2008 Report Share Posted March 31, 2008 nomi monster are hard to ban... anyway, the second effect won't be very effective when comes to finish a duel... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted March 31, 2008 Author Report Share Posted March 31, 2008 I need a list of continuous traps that have an effect when destroyed. NAOW! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gravitize Me Cap'n! Posted March 31, 2008 Report Share Posted March 31, 2008 Long ****ing list. Bannable obv. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Father Wolf Posted March 31, 2008 Report Share Posted March 31, 2008 well when the first disscusion of this came up ppl hated this card because u give up your hard earnd jinzo sence at the time u can only run 2. Well he dont really help u Jinzo him self is more than enough to hurt your opponite with his 2400 atk of death so a 200 point up isnt that big. thats a -1 from me. his effect takes down, call/final attack orders/wall of light/gravity bind... thats about it so let me seei give him a 5/10. in a future jinzo deck i can see running 1 maybe 2 but never ever !3 thats a waist of good gadget space =3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted March 31, 2008 Author Report Share Posted March 31, 2008 Even with Jinzo at 2, I'm running this guy at 3. Also, lulz @ Jinzo in Gadgets. Gadgets need their traps. Badly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gravitize Me Cap'n! Posted March 31, 2008 Report Share Posted March 31, 2008 in a future jinzo deck i can see running 1 maybe 2 but never ever !3 thats a waist of good gadget space =3 So you're that scrub that runs Jinzo in Gadgets. Nice to meet you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Father Wolf Posted March 31, 2008 Report Share Posted March 31, 2008 Even with Jinzo at 2' date=' I'm running this guy at 3. Also, lulz @ Jinzo in Gadgets. Gadgets need their traps. Badly.[/quote']and ur reasoning for that is might i ask... i dont see what so great about him... yeah because saks and mirrior force are badly needed when u have shrinks, creature swaps, and limiter removal <.< i dont see the problem running a jinzo in gadgets Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted March 31, 2008 Author Report Share Posted March 31, 2008 Even with Jinzo at 2' date=' I'm running this guy at 3. Also, lulz @ Jinzo in Gadgets. Gadgets need their traps. Badly.[/quote']and ur reasoning for that is might i ask... yeah because saks and mirrior force are badly needed when u have shrinks, creature swaps, and limiter removal <.< i dont see the problem running a jinzo in gadgets My reasoning for running him in 3's, or my reasoning for saying that Gadgets need traps? lol saku. lol limiter removal. First of all, Oppression Gadgets and Van'Dalgyon Gadgets (or, better yet, a hybrid of the two) are the only way to go with Gadgets, and both are focused around a trap or traps. Second of all, all the Creature Swaps in the world won't save you from that Dark Armed Dragon that was just Summoned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Father Wolf Posted March 31, 2008 Report Share Posted March 31, 2008 Even with Jinzo at 2' date=' I'm running this guy at 3. Also, lulz @ Jinzo in Gadgets. Gadgets need their traps. Badly.[/quote']and ur reasoning for that is might i ask... yeah because saks and mirrior force are badly needed when u have shrinks, creature swaps, and limiter removal <.< i dont see the problem running a jinzo in gadgets My reasoning for running him in 3's, or my reasoning for saying that Gadgets need traps? lol saku. lol limiter removal. First of all, Oppression Gadgets and Van'Dalgyon Gadgets (or, better yet, a hybrid of the two) are the only way to go with Gadgets, and both are focused around a trap or traps. Second of all, all the Creature Swaps in the world won't save you from that Dark Armed Dragon that was just Summoned. My reasoning for running him in 3's < that and i get what ur saying kinda i dont know what Van'Dalgyon Gadgets is but ok. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted March 31, 2008 Author Report Share Posted March 31, 2008 Even with Jinzo at 2' date=' I'm running this guy at 3. Also, lulz @ Jinzo in Gadgets. Gadgets need their traps. Badly.[/quote']and ur reasoning for that is might i ask... yeah because saks and mirrior force are badly needed when u have shrinks, creature swaps, and limiter removal <.< i dont see the problem running a jinzo in gadgets My reasoning for running him in 3's, or my reasoning for saying that Gadgets need traps? lol saku. lol limiter removal. First of all, Oppression Gadgets and Van'Dalgyon Gadgets (or, better yet, a hybrid of the two) are the only way to go with Gadgets, and both are focused around a trap or traps. Second of all, all the Creature Swaps in the world won't save you from that Dark Armed Dragon that was just Summoned. My reasoning for running him in 3's < that and i get what ur saying kinda i dont know what Van'Dalgyon Gadgets is but ok. Because he's a Metalzoa that I can actually use. Van'Dalgyon Gadgets is Gadgets with lots of counter traps and this guy: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gravitize Me Cap'n! Posted March 31, 2008 Report Share Posted March 31, 2008 Reasoning for running in triplets: Android - Psycho Lord Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HORUS Posted March 31, 2008 Report Share Posted March 31, 2008 Android - Psycho Lord is better than Needle Burrower. Ban now. And make DAD at 4. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted March 31, 2008 Report Share Posted March 31, 2008 Its anime effect was ten times better... Im not happy with this card. Why? cause you can only use his effect ONCE! And as for 300 damage... woohoo... it should be 800 or even 1000 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exiro Posted March 31, 2008 Report Share Posted March 31, 2008 If you have Jinzo out, you really don't need this. This is slightly better, but if you don't have Jinzo out, it's a waste of place in your hand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wilson91 Posted March 31, 2008 Report Share Posted March 31, 2008 To be honest, i'd just stick with a Jinzo. Sure it is slightly better, but 300 damage isn't a lot. Also, this could potentially be a horrible top deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OmegaWave Posted March 31, 2008 Report Share Posted March 31, 2008 ^^ Agree I'd stick with Jinzo. The only thing different about this card is:-Increased ATK/DEF-Destruction Effect Psycho Lord's Destruction effect is pretty much useless because of it's first effect. It's only good for the turn that it's played. After that, it's useless because Amplifier doesn't work on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Supreme Posted March 31, 2008 Report Share Posted March 31, 2008 Amplifier? Lulz! ****ing badass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chaos Pudding Posted March 31, 2008 Report Share Posted March 31, 2008 Its anime effect was ten times better... Im not happy with this card. Why? cause you can only use his effect ONCE! And as for 300 damage... woohoo... it should be 800 or even 1000 How do you expect that someone will get the chance to activate anymore Traps to even have it be worth using it again? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted March 31, 2008 Report Share Posted March 31, 2008 *Facepalm* You're not gonna be using Android - Psycho Lord to summon him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.