Spinny Posted February 24, 2015 Report Share Posted February 24, 2015 Hi guys, Latest Version, [spoiler=Old Version][/spoiler] Mainly looks like it could use some stream-lining So CC is very much appreciated since i dont play Fire Kings much at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krein Posted February 24, 2015 Report Share Posted February 24, 2015 I'd recommend running Garunix at 2, in case one of them gets banished by something like D. Prison or BTH. You can drop one of the Volcanic Shells to do that. Fire King Island is searchable by Barong, so you could replace the two Terraformings with MSTs for back row removal, or replace them with staples like Solemn Warning and Compulsory Evacuation Device. In the extra deck, how do you plan to make use of Big Eye and Dracossak? Garunix and Nephthys are both Level 8, not 7. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spinny Posted February 24, 2015 Author Report Share Posted February 24, 2015 I'd recommend running Garunix at 2, in case one of them gets banished by something like D. Prison or BTH. You can drop one of the Volcanic Shells to do that. Fire King Island is searchable by Barong, so you could replace the two Terraformings with MSTs for back row removal, or replace them with staples like Solemn Warning and Compulsory Evacuation Device. In the extra deck, how do you plan to make use of Big Eye and Dracossak? Garunix and Nephthys are both Level 8, not 7. The ED thing is totally just my mistake. I thought of running garunix at 2 but I didn't want to run too many monsters, BTW shell is a 3-of and works best that way from testing. So I could take out yaksha for another garunix since yaksha doesn't help too much apart from R4's. Problem with taking out Terra for MST because of barong is that the field spell is what makes barong even more live so I wouldn't do that. I'll change it tomoz, if you could remind me that would be great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Progenitor Posted February 25, 2015 Report Share Posted February 25, 2015 You could always just drop a Vanity's for the 2nd Garunix. I personally never like to run more than 2 unless it's a deck that almost never special summons like Yosenju. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spinny Posted February 25, 2015 Author Report Share Posted February 25, 2015 You could always just drop a Vanity's for the 2nd Garunix. I personally never like to run more than 2 unless it's a deck that almost never special summons like Yosenju. But you can easily manipulate vanity's because of the field spell and Accelerator :/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Progenitor Posted February 25, 2015 Report Share Posted February 25, 2015 But you can easily manipulate vanity's because of the field spell and Accelerator :/ Precisely why I thought you were running 3. I'm just saying, of all the things in this build to drop a copy of for another Garunix that would affect it the least is probably either 1 vanity's or 1 of your Nephthys. Everything else is kinda necessary for the deck to run consistently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(GigaDrillBreaker) Posted February 25, 2015 Report Share Posted February 25, 2015 I say cut a firstorm guard for the second garunix. By putting Emeral in extra (cut a castel for that) firestorm guard is much less essential to draw into. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spinny Posted February 25, 2015 Author Report Share Posted February 25, 2015 I say cut a firstorm guard for the second garunix. By putting Emeral in extra (cut a castel for that) firestorm guard is much less essential to draw into. K ill try that. Precisely why I thought you were running 3. I'm just saying, of all the things in this build to drop a copy of for another Garunix that would affect it the least is probably either 1 vanity's or 1 of your Nephthys. Everything else is kinda necessary for the deck to run consistently. Yeah, but i would prefer to keep the vanity's ideally, but thanks. OP Updated Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.