HORUS Posted March 30, 2008 Report Share Posted March 30, 2008 Ban Snipe Hunter. Limit Tribe Infecting Virus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedSceptile Posted March 30, 2008 Report Share Posted March 30, 2008 Diamond is the hardest metal known the man. Pro-rebuttal New copy pasta response. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Static Posted March 30, 2008 Report Share Posted March 30, 2008 broken cards are broken Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damien Phoenix Posted April 1, 2008 Report Share Posted April 1, 2008 Yes! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kakashi4eva Posted April 1, 2008 Report Share Posted April 1, 2008 Hell yes. *nod* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shonenhikada Posted April 1, 2008 Report Share Posted April 1, 2008 no because base on card making logic if a card gives a benefit and has a cost that is of equal merit, then its not broke. eg if i discard a card to play a card then its not broke,because of equivalent exchange. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusofChaos™ Posted April 1, 2008 Report Share Posted April 1, 2008 yes due to the fact in this meta it makes it too easy to load your graveyard with 3 darks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exiro Posted April 1, 2008 Report Share Posted April 1, 2008 Snipe is even better than Tribe-Infecting Virus, because he can also target s/t, and he doesn't destroy your own monsters.Off course Snipe should be banned! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Father Wolf Posted April 1, 2008 Report Share Posted April 1, 2008 no snipe hunter shouldn't be banned. u guys are retarded its toss a card for a card but only 77% of the time because of its down side. >.< yes lets get rid of him hes so much better than tribe inf.v god. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShinobiDark72 Posted April 1, 2008 Report Share Posted April 1, 2008 No, it's called being a good player if You use the strategy to dump something from Your hand(like a Dark monster to summon DAD.) If You have enough cards in Your hand, and enough luck, Your opponent just got mass obliterated by a dice-roll effect, and got a direct attack for 1500(plus whatever else You have on the field at the time.) My point: Snipe Hunter should not be banned becasue He offers good strategy to the game, besides, we've all had our field mass obliterated at one point, or given someone just that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted April 1, 2008 Report Share Posted April 1, 2008 no snipe hunter shouldn't be banned. u guys are retarded its toss a card for a card but only 77% of the time because of its down side. >.< yes lets get rid of him hes so much better than tribe inf.v god.When you think about it, he's much better than Tribe in the fact that he can be searched out, target any card on the field (therefore taking priority and possibly destroy face-downs to negate its summon), and lets you target your own cards if you really wanted to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted April 1, 2008 Report Share Posted April 1, 2008 no because base on card making logic if a card gives a benefit and has a cost that is of equal merit' date=' then its not broke. eg if i discard a card to play a card then its not broke,because of equivalent exchange.[/quote'] Equivalent Exchange? Are we talking about alchemy or card games here? Also: It has a cost. It requires luck. Therefore, it's not broken. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shonenhikada Posted April 1, 2008 Report Share Posted April 1, 2008 no because base on card making logic if a card gives a benefit and has a cost that is of equal merit' date=' then its not broke. eg if i discard a card to play a card then its not broke,because of equivalent exchange.[/quote'] Equivalent Exchange? Are we talking about alchemy or card games here? Also: It has a cost. It requires luck. Therefore, it's not broken. again since when has discard 1 card to take out a card. Mean no cost. It has cost, yes luck to which makes it all the less weaker than tribe. No broke try again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maspe Posted April 1, 2008 Report Share Posted April 1, 2008 YES!!!!!!!!!! I can't tell you how many tournaments I have lost because of that card!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted April 1, 2008 Report Share Posted April 1, 2008 no because base on card making logic if a card gives a benefit and has a cost that is of equal merit' date=' then its not broke. eg if i discard a card to play a card then its not broke,because of equivalent exchange.[/quote'] Equivalent Exchange? Are we talking about alchemy or card games here? Also: It has a cost. It requires luck. Therefore, it's not broken. again since when has discard 1 card to take out a card. Mean no cost. It has cost, yes luck to which makes it all the less weaker than tribe. No broke try again. Nobody ever said that Snipe Hunter has no cost. Snipe Hunter does; Graceful Charity does not. Learn how the game works. Also, did you not notice the part where I said that +0 cards can be broken? Snipe targets anything and makes OTKs ridiculously easy. And he promotes overextending. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shonenhikada Posted April 1, 2008 Report Share Posted April 1, 2008 no because base on card making logic if a card gives a benefit and has a cost that is of equal merit' date=' then its not broke. eg if i discard a card to play a card then its not broke,because of equivalent exchange.[/quote'] Equivalent Exchange? Are we talking about alchemy or card games here? Also: It has a cost. It requires luck. Therefore, it's not broken. again since when has discard 1 card to take out a card. Mean no cost. It has cost, yes luck to which makes it all the less weaker than tribe. No broke try again. Nobody ever said that Snipe Hunter has no cost. Snipe Hunter does; Graceful Charity does not. Learn how the game works. Also, did you not notice the part where I said that +0 cards can be broken? Snipe targets anything and makes OTKs ridiculously easy. And he promotes overextending. quoting crab helmet :t has a cost. It requires luck. Therefore, it's not broken. so no one ever said it had no cost uh. I use the card i know how it works. Snipe targets so what that's his effect you gonna say any card that targets traps and spells broke now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted April 1, 2008 Report Share Posted April 1, 2008 no because base on card making logic if a card gives a benefit and has a cost that is of equal merit' date=' then its not broke. eg if i discard a card to play a card then its not broke,because of equivalent exchange.[/quote'] Equivalent Exchange? Are we talking about alchemy or card games here? Also: It has a cost. It requires luck. Therefore, it's not broken. again since when has discard 1 card to take out a card. Mean no cost. It has cost, yes luck to which makes it all the less weaker than tribe. No broke try again. Nobody ever said that Snipe Hunter has no cost. Snipe Hunter does; Graceful Charity does not. Learn how the game works. Also, did you not notice the part where I said that +0 cards can be broken? Snipe targets anything and makes OTKs ridiculously easy. And he promotes overextending. quoting crab helmet :t has a cost. It requires luck. Therefore, it's not broken. Indeed, I did say that, in reference to Pot of Brimley. so no one ever said it had no cost uh. That is correct. You would have realized that sooner if you had elementary command of the English language. I use the card i know how it works. Good' date=' you managed to read the card. We're getting somewhere. Snipe targets so what that's his effect Pot of Greed lets you draw. So what? That's its effect. you gonna say any card that targets traps and spells broke now. Why do you insist on creating counterarguments to arguments that have not been made and will never be made? Read my last post more carefully. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Black Fang Posted April 1, 2008 Report Share Posted April 1, 2008 i perfer snipe hunter to stay as is, although it has an very hard arguement, i dont know who uses Dark Eruption to get it back. I throw away necrogardna wit Snipe Hunter, thats all though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shonenhikada Posted April 1, 2008 Report Share Posted April 1, 2008 no because base on card making logic if a card gives a benefit and has a cost that is of equal merit' date=' then its not broke. eg if i discard a card to play a card then its not broke,because of equivalent exchange.[/quote'] Equivalent Exchange? Are we talking about alchemy or card games here? Also: It has a cost. It requires luck. Therefore, it's not broken. again since when has discard 1 card to take out a card. Mean no cost. It has cost, yes luck to which makes it all the less weaker than tribe. No broke try again. Nobody ever said that Snipe Hunter has no cost. Snipe Hunter does; Graceful Charity does not. Learn how the game works. Also, did you not notice the part where I said that +0 cards can be broken? Snipe targets anything and makes OTKs ridiculously easy. And he promotes overextending. quoting crab helmet :t has a cost. It requires luck. Therefore, it's not broken. Indeed, I did say that, in reference to Pot of Brimley. so no one ever said it had no cost uh. That is correct. You would have realized that sooner if you had elementary command of the English language. I use the card i know how it works. Good' date=' you managed to read the card. We're getting somewhere. Snipe targets so what that's his effect Pot of Greed lets you draw. So what? That's its effect. you gonna say any card that targets traps and spells broke now. Why do you insist on creating counterarguments to arguments that have not been made and will never be made? Read my last post more carefully. Whatever dude you just don't like to be proven wrong even though you know you are. That's called pride. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted April 1, 2008 Report Share Posted April 1, 2008 no because base on card making logic if a card gives a benefit and has a cost that is of equal merit' date=' then its not broke. eg if i discard a card to play a card then its not broke,because of equivalent exchange.[/quote'] Equivalent Exchange? Are we talking about alchemy or card games here? Also: It has a cost. It requires luck. Therefore, it's not broken. again since when has discard 1 card to take out a card. Mean no cost. It has cost, yes luck to which makes it all the less weaker than tribe. No broke try again. Nobody ever said that Snipe Hunter has no cost. Snipe Hunter does; Graceful Charity does not. Learn how the game works. Also, did you not notice the part where I said that +0 cards can be broken? Snipe targets anything and makes OTKs ridiculously easy. And he promotes overextending. quoting crab helmet :t has a cost. It requires luck. Therefore, it's not broken. Indeed, I did say that, in reference to Pot of Brimley. so no one ever said it had no cost uh. That is correct. You would have realized that sooner if you had elementary command of the English language. I use the card i know how it works. Good' date=' you managed to read the card. We're getting somewhere. Snipe targets so what that's his effect Pot of Greed lets you draw. So what? That's its effect. you gonna say any card that targets traps and spells broke now. Why do you insist on creating counterarguments to arguments that have not been made and will never be made? Read my last post more carefully. Whatever dude you just don't like to be proven wrong. That's called pride. So now you're going down the Loren path of debate and will insist on shouting CHECKMATE after every post for no apparent reason? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedSceptile Posted April 1, 2008 Report Share Posted April 1, 2008 Hey guys I use horrible arguments and think that I defeated someone with my bad logic. Reminds me of someone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Logmon1 Posted April 1, 2008 Report Share Posted April 1, 2008 Are we talking about alchemy or card games here?Alchemy, totally alchemy... "Attempts to revive dead grandma* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloodrun Posted May 6, 2008 Report Share Posted May 6, 2008 yes, that card is so fricking annoying! lol =/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chaos Pudding Posted May 6, 2008 Report Share Posted May 6, 2008 yes' date=' that card is so fricking annoying! lol =/[/quote'] Why did you bump this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Purple Dinosaur Posted May 6, 2008 Report Share Posted May 6, 2008 Guys, Snipe Hunter is Limited. Stop questioning yourself and take advantage that you can still run 1 in your Deck! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.