CLG Klavier Posted February 1, 2015 Report Share Posted February 1, 2015 Jesus fucking christ. Do you see people going over 40 cards for Upstart? No. And it's CONDITIONAL in activation. You can't count it like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spinny Posted February 1, 2015 Report Share Posted February 1, 2015 Please close this conversation/make a new thread for it, its really pointless since klavier is right anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forest Fire Posted February 1, 2015 Author Report Share Posted February 1, 2015 Um what? Upstart goblin and PoD are one of the only two cards you can honestly say "Arent really there" and if your running them in a deck that has more than forty cards, the point of them is a bit ruined. You cannot say that about a hero lives, it doesnt +0 your hand, because if your using that logic then the entire Satellarknight engine "Isnt There". but it +1's your field. unless you count the lp cost. which takes it down to.... wait for it..... wait for it... a +0. Jesus fucking christ. Do you see people going over 40 cards for Upstart? No. And it's CONDITIONAL in activation. You can't count it like that. I refer you up a bit. if you ask me, a +0, basically isn't there. tellarknights are really +1's Oblivion. so, no, they are there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CLG Klavier Posted February 1, 2015 Report Share Posted February 1, 2015 I fucking quit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spinny Posted February 1, 2015 Report Share Posted February 1, 2015 I f***ing quit. Im no longer here either, this is SO dumb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forest Fire Posted February 1, 2015 Author Report Share Posted February 1, 2015 Im no longer here either, this is SO dumb. i'm not the one who had to bring up the fact you guys dismiss any deck with more than 40 cards as not as good as decks with 40. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CLG Klavier Posted February 1, 2015 Report Share Posted February 1, 2015 Because it's the fucking truth that decks with more than 40 cards are inferior. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forest Fire Posted February 1, 2015 Author Report Share Posted February 1, 2015 Lightsworns. baboom. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CLG Klavier Posted February 1, 2015 Report Share Posted February 1, 2015 ... ... what is that supposed to prove? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spinny Posted February 1, 2015 Report Share Posted February 1, 2015 Lightsworns. baboom. Ive never even seen competitive lightsworns with over 40 cards.... what are you doing. You arrogant fool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slinky Posted February 1, 2015 Report Share Posted February 1, 2015 i'm not the one who had to bring up the fact you guys dismiss any deck with more than 40 cards as not as good as decks with 40. It really depends on the deck. Heroes are not one of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forest Fire Posted February 1, 2015 Author Report Share Posted February 1, 2015 It really depends on the deck. Heroes are not one of them. THANK YOU. SOMEONE ELSE WITH A LICK OF SENSE ahem. i sincerely don't really want to cut anything tho. Ive never even seen competitive lightsworns with over 40 cards.... what are you doing. You arrogant fool. I've seen 60 card lightsworn decks on Dn that still do well.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BANZAI!!!! Posted February 1, 2015 Report Share Posted February 1, 2015 THANK YOU. SOMEONE ELSE WITH A LICK OF SENSE ahem. i sincerely don't really want to cut anything tho. I've seen 60 card lightsworn decks on Dn that still do well.... DN is DN, not really a valid point. ANd you really should cut it to 40. the deck will run better, plain and simple. Maybe drop the tengus, add a bubbleman, and restock the extra accordingly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forest Fire Posted February 1, 2015 Author Report Share Posted February 1, 2015 ANd you really should cut it to 40. the deck will run better, plain and simple. Maybe drop the tengus, add a bubbleman, and restock the extra accordingly. o.O ah.... no. Divine Wind is way to epic and i only have 1 Form Change. also I'd have to take Great Tornado out... Which is do-able, just put The Shining in, but mostly ahem. i sincerely don't really want to cut anything tho. I really just don't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted February 1, 2015 Report Share Posted February 1, 2015 Lightsworns are typically luck based, and honestly won't give a shit how many cards you run, as long as you can mill 4 Sworns and have JD in-hand. So that part of the "argument" is moot. And as far as the Upstart idea goes... If a deck is@43 and claims to be at 40 because of Upstart- A deck@40 and then claims to be 37 because of Upstart, will be better. The point is you want less cards, and more of a 'chance' to draw into what you really need. In this case, it's typically just stuff to enable Mist/etc plays, preferably from a Special Summon-standpoint, because HEROs can play 3 Reinforcement, 3 Emergency Call, etc, so having a HERO on-hand isn't that hard at all for them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spinny Posted February 2, 2015 Report Share Posted February 2, 2015 THANK YOU. SOMEONE ELSE WITH A LICK OF SENSE Im. So. Annoyed. Seriously. Im. Going. To. Kill. You. Okay, so whats up with this? Like, yes it obviously depends on the deck, thats a fucking given. Then saying me and klavier dont have any common sense after saying a mathematically proven point against your extremely shit points, you are literally arrogant, your obnoxious, and you need to accept that this is a point that most decks function better this way. You Disgust me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delibirb Posted February 2, 2015 Report Share Posted February 2, 2015 There's a topic now for discussing deck sizes so let's try to argue about that there and keep this topic for this deck in particular. Maybe just me, but I'm not a massive fan of the hands here. I would drop them for 2 summoner Monk, another Hero Lives, and maybe a couple poly for Blazeman to deck thin with. That could/would/should bring you down to 40 as well and add more consistency cards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spinny Posted February 2, 2015 Report Share Posted February 2, 2015 There's a topic now for discussing deck sizes so let's try to argue about that there and keep this topic for this deck in particular. yes but there isnt a thread called "Why Jinx Is Being Outright Stupid" where i can complain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CLG Klavier Posted February 2, 2015 Report Share Posted February 2, 2015 yes but there isnt a thread called "Why Jinx Is Being Outright Stupid" where i can complain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forest Fire Posted February 2, 2015 Author Report Share Posted February 2, 2015 yes but there isnt a thread called "Why Jinx Is Being Outright Stupid" where i can complain. Name's Forest Fire now, thanks. and please leave already. like you said you were going to like a comment or two ago. nope sorry, it was like four. Maybe just me, but I'm not a massive fan of the hands here. I would drop them for 2 summoner Monk, another Hero Lives, and maybe a couple poly for Blazeman to deck thin with. That could/would/should bring you down to 40 as well and add more consistency cards 2 monk, 1 Hero Lives, and 1 Poly. done. just let me edit it and post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.