Azuh Posted March 29, 2008 Report Share Posted March 29, 2008 its boring in Forbidden aka it should be Limited... discuss Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Umbra Posted March 29, 2008 Report Share Posted March 29, 2008 *toggles Crab-Mode*With the current meta, where ATK doesn't really matter, Restrict could very well be Limited.*toggles Crab-Mode* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted March 29, 2008 Author Report Share Posted March 29, 2008 this card was only Banned because people used Goat Tokens.. then Metamorphisis to summon this card =/ since Meta is banned... unban this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusofChaos™ Posted March 29, 2008 Report Share Posted March 29, 2008 and also tyuskimo thingy spirt thing is banned which contributed alot to cookie cutter control decks it can be limited with no much impact Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SephirothKirby Posted March 29, 2008 Report Share Posted March 29, 2008 I would like to see someone else summon Thousand-Eyes Restrict / Relinquished and absorb Thousand-Eyes Restrict. It should cause a paradox. OH SH- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark_Pride Posted March 29, 2008 Report Share Posted March 29, 2008 Yeah, unban this card bec. Thousand-Eyes Idol (of all things) will be a waste w/o Thousand-Eyes Restrict. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Umbra Posted March 29, 2008 Report Share Posted March 29, 2008 I would like to see someone else summon Thousand-Eyes Restrict / Relinquished and absorb Thousand-Eyes Restrict. It should cause a paradox. Uh, no? It would just end up just having 0 ATK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chaos Pudding Posted March 29, 2008 Report Share Posted March 29, 2008 With Meta banned, why not? However, in a proper list, which would have Meta at 3, no way. Still too powerful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyber Altair Posted March 29, 2008 Report Share Posted March 29, 2008 it's a good card, but i still think it should be limited, and no one will use this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted March 29, 2008 Report Share Posted March 29, 2008 No. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Static Posted March 29, 2008 Report Share Posted March 29, 2008 bad card is bad. even in a dedicated deck, its still not very good. it should be unlimited Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted March 29, 2008 Report Share Posted March 29, 2008 The same people who think TER shouldn't be banned are probably the same people who think Treeborn Frog shouldn't be banned. Just because this is a horrible format doesn't mean the cards aren't broken. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Static Posted March 29, 2008 Report Share Posted March 29, 2008 its not a broken card. its an easier to summon, crappier version of plasma. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XanderTheGreat Posted March 29, 2008 Report Share Posted March 29, 2008 bad card is bad. even in a dedicated deck' date=' its still not very good. it should be unlimited[/quote'] NO. Well, in a meta where Morph is banned, and Cyber-Stein is banned, AND Magical Scientist is banned, he's not that good. Just unlimit Morph and this card gets godlike automatically. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Static Posted March 29, 2008 Report Share Posted March 29, 2008 bad card is bad. even in a dedicated deck' date=' its still not very good. it should be unlimited[/quote'] NO. Well, in a meta where Morph is banned, and Cyber-Stein is banned, AND Magical Scientist is banned, he's not that good. Just unlimit Morph and this card gets godlike automatically. weaker version of plasma Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedSceptile Posted March 29, 2008 Report Share Posted March 29, 2008 bad card is bad. even in a dedicated deck' date=' its still not very good. it should be unlimited[/quote'] NO. Well, in a meta where Morph is banned, and Cyber-Stein is banned, AND Magical Scientist is banned, he's not that good. Just unlimit Morph and this card gets godlike automatically. weaker version of plasma This card is godly with unlimited Metamorphisis. If it were to come back with no Morph, obviously it's a weaker Plasma. But, if Morph's unlimited he lols @ Plasma hard for being a poser that isn't as good as him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted March 29, 2008 Report Share Posted March 29, 2008 Thousand Eyes really isn't that broken, but what gives it the broken ability is when it's used with Metamorphosis. That, and his ability to chomp on stronger monsters, rid of his equip, and steal a new monster. Right now it could easily come back, though, and nothing would change. Almost every [okay] deck in existence has at least 2 ways to destroy a card other than through battle. And against some decks this card has absolutely no power at all (though very rare). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted March 29, 2008 Report Share Posted March 29, 2008 And against some decks this card has absolutely no power at all (though very rare). The same could be said of Raigeki. As long as Metamorphosis remains banned, this card isn't banworthy, and since Limiting a Fusion Monster is just stupid (outside of Traditional when Advanced has banned it, obviously), it follows that it should be unlimited. However, Metamorphosis and this card cannot co-exist (since Metamorphosis makes this so easy to summon that it becomes too easy to use; remember Goat Control?), and Metamorphosis is far more worthy of being unbanned than Thousand-Eyes Restrict is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted March 29, 2008 Report Share Posted March 29, 2008 They're probably going to start making dumb rules like "this card is banned in decks that include.." If they do, I'll be mad D< Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted March 29, 2008 Report Share Posted March 29, 2008 They're probably going to start making dumb rules like "this card is banned in decks that include.." If they do' date=' I'll be mad D<[/quote'] Actually, that would be fine by me. It makes sense in many cases; for example, Butterfly Dagger - Elma is only overpowered if used with Gearfried the Iron Knight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted March 29, 2008 Report Share Posted March 29, 2008 Yeah, but it would just make things more difficult. And you know there are n00bs who wont understand anything about that. Plus the complaining that would result.. Then there's also the problem when new cards come out @.@ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ben7922 Posted March 29, 2008 Report Share Posted March 29, 2008 It'd be fine with me tooBack to the topic, without any convential methods of realistically seeing play(Guardian Elma... sry lulz) it can be unlimitedBut then if any of the already mentioned cards see play once more it'll banned again anywaysSo it might as well stay there EDIT:Agreeing with crabman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark One Posted March 30, 2008 Report Share Posted March 30, 2008 Why's everyone afraid of Morph and TER coexisting? Goat's at 1, remember? And I don't think Goat Control could rival Dark Armed Dragon Return anyways. (Though if we could only have 1 of the 2, Morph obviously comes first.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted March 30, 2008 Report Share Posted March 30, 2008 Why's everyone afraid of Morph and TER coexisting? Goat's at 1' date=' remember? And I don't think Goat Control could rival Dark Armed Dragon Return anyways. (Though if we could only have 1 of the 2, Morph obviously comes first.)[/quote']Do you know how many cards there are that summon Level 1 monsters? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted March 30, 2008 Report Share Posted March 30, 2008 Why's everyone afraid of Morph and TER coexisting? Goat's at 1' date=' remember? And I don't think Goat Control could rival Dark Armed Dragon Return anyways. (Though if we could only have 1 of the 2, Morph obviously comes first.)[/quote'] DAD would be the first change to be made to a banlist, followed shortly by Dimension Fusion, DMoC, and Magical Explosion. That solves all that broken stuff. Also, even if Scapegoat did stay at 1, there are lots of other Level 1 tokens in existence, and aren't most of the Apprentice engine monsters Level 1? There are a lot of Level 1 monsters that are playable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.