Maeriberii Haan Posted January 7, 2015 Report Share Posted January 7, 2015 Death of the Individual Continuous Spell All monsters on the field is treated as having no name, type, and attribute. All effect that specifies a specific monster name, type, or attribute is treated as not having the condition. All effects that affects a specific monster name, type, or attribute on the field is treated as affecting all monsters on the field. Just noticed today that I uploaded this to public some ages ago when I'm browsing for stuffs, idk. Idk, forgot the intent when I first made this aside from being an Ib reference, but this kinda looks like a gimmicky side card, or if one is daring, a deck focused on this. (and the "specifies a specific monster name" part is not supposed to include archetype. Idk about wording so yeah) Discuss? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darj Posted January 7, 2015 Report Share Posted January 7, 2015 Card is silly and interesting. I guess it is effective at nullifying all kinds of type, Attribute and archetype support, but that would also hurt yourself unless you design a deck that doesn't support itself in any way; an Anti-meta deck, perhaps. Looks like an amusing card. By the way, I don't get the reference; what do you mean with "Ib"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cirrus Posted January 7, 2015 Report Share Posted January 7, 2015 Just cutting in to note that Ib might be this game. It's a cute card, but now I want to find a way to break it into pieces ... I wonder what cards could really benefit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VampireofDarkness Posted January 7, 2015 Report Share Posted January 7, 2015 So lemme get this straight. Say I'm playing Infernity and I so happen to have this and I activate it, then I play Launcher to bring back 2 monsters. Can I not activate the effect or can I bring back any 2 monsters I wish? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maeriberii Haan Posted January 7, 2015 Author Report Share Posted January 7, 2015 So lemme get this straight. Say I'm playing Infernity and I so happen to have this and I activate it, then I play Launcher to bring back 2 monsters. Can I not activate the effect or can I bring back any 2 monsters I wish? Archetypes are supposed to be exempt from this card. And yeah, Cirrus is correct regarding what I'm referencing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Love of Ghibli Posted January 7, 2015 Report Share Posted January 7, 2015 Sounds like qliphorts have a good card for their side deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darj Posted January 7, 2015 Report Share Posted January 7, 2015 Ah, I misunderstood: I thought it was meant to affect archetypes. The card looks less disruptive now. Would be cool if it actually stopped (not outright negate, similar to Vanity Emptiness) effects that involve archetypes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maeriberii Haan Posted January 7, 2015 Author Report Share Posted January 7, 2015 Ah, whoops, when I mean that it does not include archetypes, I was referring to the second and third effect. This would prevent archetypal effects turning into generic cards when this is up. Note that on the field, the archetype monsters don't have a name, period. This is like the continuous spell version of Nameless from Arc-V. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Self-Destruct Button Posted January 7, 2015 Report Share Posted January 7, 2015 Sounds like qliphorts have a good card for their side deck. Like any of us DPers would actually play that o/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Griffin Posted January 7, 2015 Report Share Posted January 7, 2015 This card is screaming to be used in some gimmicky OTK/loop Decks. Suddenly, ever "You can only use the effect of "X" once per turn" effects are meaningless, because "X" isn't using the effect, a card without a name is. Seems like a really toxic card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yemachu Posted January 7, 2015 Report Share Posted January 7, 2015 And then you banished a "Dragon Ruler" monster which would normally search for a Dragon-Type monster with the same attribute as the banished "Dragon Ruler"; now it searches for any monster in your Deck. Something which I consider to be overpowered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darj Posted January 7, 2015 Report Share Posted January 7, 2015 Both Griffin and Yemachu bring good points. The card looks far more dangerous that I initially thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.