Jump to content

Battle! Rebellion Leader! [DDD]


Blake

Recommended Posts

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dA3mccI1DjY

cOaSavv.png

 

Decklist later

 

I really am liking this build more than the old one. More streamlined.

 

Have yet to draw Pot of Riches/Wealth or Perpetual Oscillation, sadly, but they make sense in theory. The latter may just be outclasses by Galilei, who has really begun to pull its weight thanks to how you actually can benefit from multiple scale combinations now.

 

Lilith is really the best card in the deck, monster-wise. Leo is a close second, but she gives you so much advantage. I am considering maxing her, but that OPT is a bit hard to deal with, despite being the standalone strongest.

 

Trying 2 of Abyss Ragnarok, but unsure of ratios. I do occasionally desire to NS it, though, so that's good.

 

1 Ogre because it still lets me get Leos back, though I'm unsure if its scale is still required, so trying ratios. Will probably bump back up to 2, if only because Level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Running 0 MST feels a bit off, especially for a format where your deck is so severely hurt by vanity's and qliphort tool exists. Then again, this build is more centered around Valkyrie, because of synergy with COO, so that may be enough for both mentioned uses. Only 1 ogre? That feels really strange, but since it cannot be used to pendulum summon COO i see where you are going with it.

My cut (though i cannot tell how necessary it would be) is dropping the upstarts for 2 MST and a second Ogre, or perhaps a third vanity's. Maybe just 3 MST.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Huh, Oscilation seems great, didn't notice it earlier. Good find.

 

PERSONALLY, I'd cut an Abyss Ragnarok for another Ogre/Lilith/Galilei, whichever you prefer.

I still haven't found Ogre to be needed in higher numbers now, and I do like searching Ragnarok #2 for NSing/ditching purposes later. It's not like a Ragnarok on the board will ever hit the grave again (bar Pot of Wealth/Riches), soooo...

 

Lilith is tempting, but damn that OPT.

 

Running 0 MST feels a bit off, especially for a format where your deck is so severely hurt by vanity's and qliphort tool exists. Then again, this build is more centered around Valkyrie, because of synergy with COO, so that may be enough for both mentioned uses. Only 1 ogre? That feels really strange, but since it cannot be used to pendulum summon COO i see where you are going with it.

My cut (though i cannot tell how necessary it would be) is dropping the upstarts for 2 MST and a second Ogre, or perhaps a third vanity's. Maybe just 3 MST.

I wouldn't drop Upstart. If you don't hit Kepler/Hellgate early, you have to be PRAYING to get a usable Pendulum hand. This makes it less likely to brick as that's more cards to dig with.

 

MST hasn't seemed necessary yet. It probably is, Qliphorts and whatnot, but I generally get Valkyrie set up early as a near-infinite better MST. And the build isn't "centered" on Valkyrie any more than the old one, just makes it a bit better than before, when it was already really good. 

 

Ogre was optimal because it didn't shut off Odd-Eyes (thus making R7/OTKing easier), but now you have Abyss Ragnarok so that means you're less likely to need the 8 scale over the 10 scale.

 

That said, it is the second best big scale, which is why I still run the one strong copy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I take it that Howling proved to be useless, huh?
Been a while since I've seen you post DDs, really...

Not useless, but it's the weakest DD.

 

In essence, it's a free Level 7 Synchro, but... The issue is that its only good target is Lilith, and there are a plethora of other good ways to revive her and Lv. 7 Fiend Synchros aren't THAT good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not useless, but it's the weakest DD.
 
In essence, it's a free Level 7 Synchro, but... The issue is that its only good target is Lilith, and there are a plethora of other good ways to revive her and Lv. 7 Fiend Synchros aren't THAT good.

I meant like the shenanigans with Alexander, but either way, I see your point.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...