Umbra Posted March 23, 2008 Report Share Posted March 23, 2008 http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Dummy_Golem Good, bad? Discuss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wilson91 Posted March 23, 2008 Report Share Posted March 23, 2008 Bad. Who would run this thing anyway? Yeah sure, you could flip it and steal a monster, but it's not worth a) The deck spaceb) The monster card zonec) The opponents monsterd) The money rofl. You could use cards which kill all of your opponents monster like lightning vortex or a TtTD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted March 23, 2008 Report Share Posted March 23, 2008 Read the rulings on the card to find out why it's terrible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted March 23, 2008 Report Share Posted March 23, 2008 I'm too lazy to check Netrep for this, so I'll just post the rulings that the Wiki has: * If "Dummy Golem" is attacked, flipped, and destroyed by damage calculation, its effect is not applied because it is destroyed. So control does not switch. * If an effect like "Ring of Destruction" is chained to the Flip Effect of "Dummy Golem", destroying "Dummy Golem", the effect of "Dummy Golem" disappears. * If the opponent only has one monster, and it is "Blindly Loyal Goblin" or "Mataza the Zapper", and you activate the Flip Effect of "Dummy Golem", the effect does activate and can be chained to, however its effect disappears because control of "Blindly Loyal Goblin" cannot switch. * If the opponent has "Blindly Loyal Goblin" and "Gemini Elf" on the field, and you activate the Flip Effect of "Dummy Golem", the opponent cannot select "Blindly Loyal Goblin". They must select "Gemini Elf". * If control of monsters switches with "Dummy Golem", it stays switched as long as the cards remain on the field. (Like "Creature Swap".) * The effect of "Dummy Golem" will NOT resolve if any of the following is true: o (1) "Dummy Golem" is not on the field when the effect resolves; o (2) "Dummy Golem" has been destroyed before the effect resolves, such as by damage calculation; o (3) there is no opponent's monster when the effect resolves, such as if it was returned to the hand with "Compulsory Evacuation Device". Yeah, it fails. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SephirothKirby Posted March 23, 2008 Report Share Posted March 23, 2008 My favorite ruling is If this card would be destroy in battle, the Reverse effect of this card would not be activate at all since you MUST switch control of "THIS CARD" and other one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abstract [Atrocity] Posted March 23, 2008 Report Share Posted March 23, 2008 Crappy. If it's effect activated when it was attacked it would be banned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exiro Posted March 23, 2008 Report Share Posted March 23, 2008 Bad card is bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyber Altair Posted March 23, 2008 Report Share Posted March 23, 2008 Bad card is bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.