RedSceptile Posted March 22, 2008 Report Share Posted March 22, 2008 Should be unlimited. gogogo! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted March 22, 2008 Report Share Posted March 22, 2008 Not in today's format :/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted March 22, 2008 Report Share Posted March 22, 2008 Not in today's format :/ A list with this unlimited wouldn't be Today's Format; it would be a different format, since the banlist would be different. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted March 22, 2008 Report Share Posted March 22, 2008 Not in today's format :/ A list with this unlimited wouldn't be Today's Format; it would be a different format' date=' since the banlist would be different.[/quote']If you're using that logic, then we could say that I said that it was impossible, and so then it would make sense why it shouldn't be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedSceptile Posted March 22, 2008 Author Report Share Posted March 22, 2008 k anyways. rota should be unlimited. y/n give sufficient enough reasoning, don't go "but it let dem get lots of werriors like armygedon knight nd startos!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted March 22, 2008 Report Share Posted March 22, 2008 Not in today's format :/ A list with this unlimited wouldn't be Today's Format; it would be a different format' date=' since the banlist would be different.[/quote']If you're using that logic, then we could say that I said that it was impossible, and so then it would make sense why it shouldn't be. The post that I have just quoted makes no sense whatsoever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted March 22, 2008 Report Share Posted March 22, 2008 k anyways. rota should be unlimited. y/n give sufficient enough reasoning' date=' don't go "but it let dem get lots of werriors like armygedon knight nd startos!"[/quote']Just increases the speed of all DDT decks. The ones that run 3 Emerngency Calls can run an extra Reinforce and have more options to draw from Armageddon, Stratos, Diamond Dude, and other such cards. You can't say you can't give a good argument, because then you're saying your argument holds no footing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted March 22, 2008 Report Share Posted March 22, 2008 k anyways. rota should be unlimited. y/n give sufficient enough reasoning' date=' don't go "but it let dem get lots of werriors like armygedon knight nd startos!"[/quote']Just increases the speed of all DDT decks. The ones that run 3 Emerngency Calls can run an extra Reinforce and have more options to draw from Armageddon, Stratos, Diamond Dude, and other such cards. You can't say you can't give a good argument, because then you're saying your argument holds no footing. There are DDT decks that run 3 E-Call? In a proper format, DMoC and Dimension Fusion are both banned, so DDT's effectiveness is irrelevant. Diamond Dude isn't even really necessary for DDT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted March 22, 2008 Report Share Posted March 22, 2008 k anyways. rota should be unlimited. y/n give sufficient enough reasoning' date=' don't go "but it let dem get lots of werriors like armygedon knight nd startos!"[/quote']Just increases the speed of all DDT decks. The ones that run 3 Emerngency Calls can run an extra Reinforce and have more options to draw from Armageddon, Stratos, Diamond Dude, and other such cards. You can't say you can't give a good argument, because then you're saying your argument holds no footing. There are DDT decks that run 3 E-Call? In a proper format, DMoC and Dimension Fusion are both banned, so DDT's effectiveness is irrelevant. Diamond Dude isn't even really necessary for DDT.It doesn't matter about a proper format. In a proper format, everything would be perfect, and nothing would have to be discussed upon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted March 22, 2008 Report Share Posted March 22, 2008 personally i really dont think it should be limited =/ as your opponent is just gonna have other means of finding dd so ykno warriors in general could get a little boos i see no reason whynot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted March 22, 2008 Report Share Posted March 22, 2008 k anyways. rota should be unlimited. y/n give sufficient enough reasoning' date=' don't go "but it let dem get lots of werriors like armygedon knight nd startos!"[/quote']Just increases the speed of all DDT decks. The ones that run 3 Emerngency Calls can run an extra Reinforce and have more options to draw from Armageddon, Stratos, Diamond Dude, and other such cards. You can't say you can't give a good argument, because then you're saying your argument holds no footing. There are DDT decks that run 3 E-Call? In a proper format, DMoC and Dimension Fusion are both banned, so DDT's effectiveness is irrelevant. Diamond Dude isn't even really necessary for DDT.It doesn't matter about a proper format. In a proper format, everything would be perfect, and nothing would have to be discussed upon. 1. Even in a proper format, each new set that comes out changes the game; therefore, discussion would be necessary so that the banlist could change to accommodate the new cards. 2. We are not in a proper format; we are discussing what a proper format would be. Bad logic is bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted March 22, 2008 Report Share Posted March 22, 2008 k anyways. rota should be unlimited. y/n give sufficient enough reasoning' date=' don't go "but it let dem get lots of werriors like armygedon knight nd startos!"[/quote']Just increases the speed of all DDT decks. The ones that run 3 Emerngency Calls can run an extra Reinforce and have more options to draw from Armageddon, Stratos, Diamond Dude, and other such cards. You can't say you can't give a good argument, because then you're saying your argument holds no footing. There are DDT decks that run 3 E-Call? In a proper format, DMoC and Dimension Fusion are both banned, so DDT's effectiveness is irrelevant. Diamond Dude isn't even really necessary for DDT.It doesn't matter about a proper format. In a proper format, everything would be perfect, and nothing would have to be discussed upon. 1. Even in a proper format, each new set that comes out changes the game; therefore, discussion would be necessary so that the banlist could change to accommodate the new cards. 2. We are not in a proper format; we are discussing what a proper format would be. Bad logic is bad.If it were proper, then we would never need to decide what to change because it would already be perfect with the addition of the new set. Discussion over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted March 22, 2008 Report Share Posted March 22, 2008 k anyways. rota should be unlimited. y/n give sufficient enough reasoning' date=' don't go "but it let dem get lots of werriors like armygedon knight nd startos!"[/quote']Just increases the speed of all DDT decks. The ones that run 3 Emerngency Calls can run an extra Reinforce and have more options to draw from Armageddon, Stratos, Diamond Dude, and other such cards. You can't say you can't give a good argument, because then you're saying your argument holds no footing. There are DDT decks that run 3 E-Call? In a proper format, DMoC and Dimension Fusion are both banned, so DDT's effectiveness is irrelevant. Diamond Dude isn't even really necessary for DDT.It doesn't matter about a proper format. In a proper format, everything would be perfect, and nothing would have to be discussed upon. 1. Even in a proper format, each new set that comes out changes the game; therefore, discussion would be necessary so that the banlist could change to accommodate the new cards. 2. We are not in a proper format; we are discussing what a proper format would be. Bad logic is bad.If it were proper, then we would never need to decide what to change because it would already be perfect with the addition of the new set. Discussion over. A proper format for March 2007 wouldn't list DAD as banned, since it didn't exist back then. Does that mean that DAD isn't banworthy nowadays? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted March 22, 2008 Report Share Posted March 22, 2008 k anyways. rota should be unlimited. y/n give sufficient enough reasoning' date=' don't go "but it let dem get lots of werriors like armygedon knight nd startos!"[/quote']Just increases the speed of all DDT decks. The ones that run 3 Emerngency Calls can run an extra Reinforce and have more options to draw from Armageddon, Stratos, Diamond Dude, and other such cards. You can't say you can't give a good argument, because then you're saying your argument holds no footing. There are DDT decks that run 3 E-Call? In a proper format, DMoC and Dimension Fusion are both banned, so DDT's effectiveness is irrelevant. Diamond Dude isn't even really necessary for DDT.It doesn't matter about a proper format. In a proper format, everything would be perfect, and nothing would have to be discussed upon. 1. Even in a proper format, each new set that comes out changes the game; therefore, discussion would be necessary so that the banlist could change to accommodate the new cards. 2. We are not in a proper format; we are discussing what a proper format would be. Bad logic is bad.If it were proper, then we would never need to decide what to change because it would already be perfect with the addition of the new set. Discussion over. A proper format for March 2007 wouldn't list DAD as banned, since it didn't exist back then. Does that mean that DAD isn't banworthy nowadays?Now you're just saying things unrelated to the post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedSceptile Posted March 22, 2008 Author Report Share Posted March 22, 2008 If it were proper, then we would never need to decide what to change because it would already be perfect with the addition of the new set. Discussion over. Now you're just saying things unrelated to the post Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted March 22, 2008 Report Share Posted March 22, 2008 If it were proper' date=' then we would never need to decide what to change because it would already be perfect with the addition of the new set. Discussion over. [/quote'] Now you're just saying things unrelated to the post Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted March 22, 2008 Report Share Posted March 22, 2008 That was related. You people obviously don't see logic well o.O Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted March 22, 2008 Report Share Posted March 22, 2008 That was related. You people obviously don't see logic well o.O LOL CHECKMATE Nobody said your post was unrelated; my post was a relevant response to yours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedSceptile Posted March 22, 2008 Author Report Share Posted March 22, 2008 That was related. You people obviously don't see logic well o.O I see logic. But I disregard bad logic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted March 22, 2008 Report Share Posted March 22, 2008 Proper Format would mean a correct format.And wouldn't a correct format be correct if it was correct?Therefore if a new set was added, then the set would become proper yet again with those cards,or it wouldn't be proper, and therefore nothing would need to be changed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted March 22, 2008 Report Share Posted March 22, 2008 Proper Format would mean a correct format.And wouldn't a correct format be correct if it was correct?Therefore if a new set was added' date=' then the set would become proper yet again with those cards,or it wouldn't be proper, and therefore nothing would need to be changed.[/quote'] I see logic. But I disregard bad logic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted March 22, 2008 Report Share Posted March 22, 2008 this card will be great at 3. too bad i dont think it will be anytime soon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XanderTheGreat Posted March 22, 2008 Report Share Posted March 22, 2008 ... I dunno actually. I do have to admit though, that warriors aren't run as much as they were in the past, so I don't think unlimiting it won't do much to the current meta. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted March 22, 2008 Report Share Posted March 22, 2008 ... I dunno actually. I do have to admit though' date=' that warriors aren't run as much as they were in the past, so I don't think unlimiting it won't do much to the current meta.[/quote'] The current meta dies when DAD, DMoC, Dimension Fusion, and Magical Explosion all get banned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Faded Posted March 23, 2008 Report Share Posted March 23, 2008 stop the fighting!! sick of you b***** always arguing like my mum and neighbour through the fence! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.