ZeRainbowDash Posted April 22, 2014 Report Share Posted April 22, 2014 Ok before everyone goes crazy I will explain why I run what I run. 3x Madolche Magiliene 3x Madolche Messengelato 3x Madolche Hootcake 3x Madolche Mewfueille 2x Madolche Marmalmaide 2x Madolche Baaple 2x Tour Guide From the Underworld 3x Madolche Chateau 3x Madolche Ticket 2x Forbidden Lance 1x Terraforming 3x Mystical Space Typhoon 1x Dark Hole 2x Madolchepalooza 1x Torrential Tribute 2x Mirror Force 2x Dimensional Prison 1x Bottomless Trap Hole 1x Solemn Warning 3x Madolche Queen Tiaramisu 2x M-X Saber InvokerS 1x Maestroke the Symphony Djinn 1x Number 101: Silent Honor ARK 1x Abyss Dweller 1x Number 106: Giant Hand 1x Leviair the Sea Dragon 1x Number 17: Leviathan Dragon 1x Wind-Up Zenmaines 1x Number 50: Blackship of Corn 1x Diamond Dire Wolf 1x Gagaga Cowboy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted April 22, 2014 Report Share Posted April 22, 2014 Get out. If you're not looking for improvements, as your last post of this deck showed, you are not welcome. You're still not running Angelly, so this deck can't be taken remotely seriously and just shows this topic is a waste of time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZeRainbowDash Posted April 22, 2014 Author Report Share Posted April 22, 2014 I think you'd take it seriously after losing to it. The only deck that dives me a problem at all is Bujins running Kaiser Coliseum. Madolches do not need Angelly. This deck runs phenomenally. If you have a problem with the deck, don't post in the thread. Simple as that. If you have a way for me to work around Kaiser Coliseum, go ahead. But if you're going to just flame it, don't post. This is a very good deck, and if you haven't seen it played, don't tell me if it should be taken seriously. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted April 22, 2014 Report Share Posted April 22, 2014 I think you'd take it seriously after losing to it. The only deck that dives me a problem at all is Bujins running Kaiser Coliseum. Madolches do not need Angelly. This deck runs phenomenally. If you have a problem with the deck, don't post in the thread. Simple as that. If you have a way for me to work around Kaiser Coliseum, go ahead. But if you're going to just flame it, don't post. This is a very good deck, and if you haven't seen it played, don't tell me if it should be taken seriously. You're not running a card that does nothing but increase consistency. And you refuse to run it. Or improve the deck. This is not a deck showcase section like you'd find on DuelistGroundz (btw, try and post it there and see what happens), because this site isn't the same level as that site. It's a deck improvement section; which you have no desire to do and refuse to use basic logic. So either get out or stop telling people you're not going to run Angelly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZeRainbowDash Posted April 22, 2014 Author Report Share Posted April 22, 2014 If you'd take the time to look back, you will see many changes. Extra Deck over haul, change in the spell/trap lineup. And yes, I would like advice. But yes. I do not have plans to run Angelly in this build. If I decide to try Angelly, I will make a seperate deck on DN. But this will not have Angelly, to show that the deck does not need it. Also, I don't want a broken deck. And I don't think anyone wants to play against a broken deck. I get enough rage quits as it is, I don't want people to scoop as soon as I summon Angelly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.A._Sakuyamon Posted April 22, 2014 Report Share Posted April 22, 2014 2 things I noticed that should be pointed out. You can't chain Lance to warning. Your own Torrential Tribute will not trigger your Madolches Return Effects. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted April 22, 2014 Report Share Posted April 22, 2014 If you'd take the timeAngelly is literally an E-Tele for Hootcake, that also sets it up.Also, because your playing Madols, you CLEARLY don't care if people "rage-quit", so why would you NOT run Angelly? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZeRainbowDash Posted April 22, 2014 Author Report Share Posted April 22, 2014 2 things I noticed that should be pointed out. You can't chain Lance to warning. Your own Torrential Tribute will not trigger your Madolches Return Effects. Yeah I noticed that when I tried to pull it when my opponent summoned out Utopia Ray Victory... Felt kinda dumb, but It set up major Hootcake and Tiara next turn, o used strategically it could work quite well. And I didn't know you couldnt chain lance to warning, thank you. Angelly is literally an E-Tele for Hootcake, that also sets it up. Also, because your playing Madols, you CLEARLY don't care if people "rage-quit", so why would you NOT run Angelly? I still like to have a duel though. I dont like people scooping. I like to finish my duels. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zauls Posted April 23, 2014 Report Share Posted April 23, 2014 If you want to enjoy a duel and not have people rage quit. Play another deck, because noobs will rage quit when they see a Hootcake. Also, your build is terrible. Baaple is awful, Marmalmaid is awful. Where is Maxx "C"? That thing is like essential for Hootcake fuel. I'm not even going to comment about the lack of Anjelly because it is completely stupid... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZeRainbowDash Posted April 23, 2014 Author Report Share Posted April 23, 2014 I have explained why I use Baaple and Maide. They are personal choices of y own, and Maide has given me many a ticket ad chateau when I didn't have one in my Graveyard. Baaples effect to change a monster to def stalled when my opponent had a Blaster on the field, and Baaple is a beast for Gelato if IO d not have a Mewfueille. This build is incredibly consistent. next time I get onto DN, I will ensure to take a couple screenshots to show you its capabilities. Or if you want, if anyone happens to be on DN when I am, I can duel you and show you what it can do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted April 23, 2014 Report Share Posted April 23, 2014 ITT: Winning a duel by luck proves your deck is optimal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZeRainbowDash Posted April 23, 2014 Author Report Share Posted April 23, 2014 But does luck let you OTK 90% of the time? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted April 23, 2014 Report Share Posted April 23, 2014 Considering you're touting a meaningless number, and you apparently revel in playing against scrubs who would normally quit against an Angelly, I'm going to say your point doesn't exist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZeRainbowDash Posted April 23, 2014 Author Report Share Posted April 23, 2014 I revel in playing scrubs? I absolutely hate dueling bad duelists. It's no challenge. I'm not kidding when I say that the only card that has given me any problems is Kaiser Coliseum. Every other deck gives me little problem, except for Samurais on occasion. I've topped competitive Fire Kings, competitive Dark World with 2 variants. I'm not saying this to make it sound like I am all amazing. I'm using these facts to point out the reliability of this deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AGATHODAIMON BANGTAIL COW Posted April 23, 2014 Report Share Posted April 23, 2014 People are going to ragequit against OTK Decks period. If people get OTKed, they don't have fun, and since you stated that you aren't running the good sh*t for the sake of having a duel, you're now contradicting yourself. This message was really for the sake of seeing if he actually would make any changes at all Also, OTK Decks don't run so many traps because they take up room that would otherwise make the Deck even more consistent than ever. TT, BTH, and Warning fit into everything, so they're fine. Mirror is pushing it. D-Pris is definitely just eating too much space. You even say that you have problems when you don't run monsters. I bet it's because you drew D-Pris and Mirror. For example, you are running only one Terraforming. Most builds run two, and it's very optimal to do so. Buuut, you don't have the space. Because D-Pris is in here. You can also bump up some other things to higher numbers, like the Baaple and Marmalmaide you're so stubborn about running and maybe a third TGU so you can be more likely to get to play it than ever before. I'm sorry, people who actually know what they're talking about and think my suggestions are horrible. As for E.D. options, #17 is horrible. If you want a Rank 3 beatstick, then you could look into Giga-Brilliant to boost your entire frontrow. If you want one that is purely a beater, run Muzurhythm. If you OTK, then you don't need to worry about it having 1500 ATK. Edit: Why did I even say that? You're just going to ramble on about how much you're going to run bad things to be nicer to the people you're OTKing in the first place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZeRainbowDash Posted April 23, 2014 Author Report Share Posted April 23, 2014 Ok. Thanks. I've been thinking about rank 3's and didn't think of Muzurythym or Giga-Brilliant. Usually the only R3 I use is Invoker, but I have Leviathan there for an extra beatstick. Muzu is the one that allows you to double the attack, right? And I only have 1 Terraforming because I have 3 Gelato and the 2 Maide. Granted, Maide is rarely used for anything other than R4 Tiaras. But most likely I'll drop the Giant Hand for it. The chances of me getting my hands on one is extremely low, so I may keep my Levi, or I may replace it with Giga so I can get better top monsters like Blaster or RDMD or what have you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dog King Posted April 24, 2014 Report Share Posted April 24, 2014 3x Madolche Magiliene 3x Madolche Messengelato 3x Madolche Hootcake 3x Madolche Mewfueille 2x Madolche Marmalmaide 2x Madolche Baaple 2x Tour Guide From the Underworld 3x Madolche Chateau 3x Madolche Ticket 2x Forbidden Lance 1x Terraforming 3x Mystical Space Typhoon 1x Dark Hole 2x Madolchepalooza 1x Torrential Tribute 2x Mirror Force 2x Dimensional Prison 1x Bottomless Trap Hole 1x Solemn Warning 3x Madolche Queen Tiaramisu 2x M-X Saber InvokerS 1x Maestroke the Symphony Djinn 1x Number 101: Silent Honor ARK 1x Abyss Dweller 1x Number 106: Giant Hand 1x Leviair the Sea Dragon 1x Number 17: Leviathan Dragon 1x Wind-Up Zenmaines 1x Number 50: Blackship of Corn 1x Diamond Dire Wolf 1x Gagaga Cowboy copy and paste that in over everything other than that the build is actual bad like why are you using 3 ticket and chateau when its easily searchable and you dont want to draw it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zauls Posted April 24, 2014 Report Share Posted April 24, 2014 I have explained why I use Baaple and Maide. They are personal choices of y own, and Maide has given me many a ticket ad chateau when I didn't have one in my Graveyard. Baaples effect to change a monster to def stalled when my opponent had a Blaster on the field, and Baaple is a beast for Gelato if IO d not have a Mewfueille. This build is incredibly consistent. next time I get onto DN, I will ensure to take a couple screenshots to show you its capabilities. Or if you want, if anyone happens to be on DN when I am, I can duel you and show you what it can do. Baaple and Maide do not contribute to the deck's goal though. The goal is to make Tiara and OTK and maintain advantage with your Spells by searching them with Gelato. That point you made is stupid because Blaster just returns to the hand in the End Phase anyway so it can be re-summoned in Attack Position. Gelato should be Special Summoned off Hootcake or Mew and you should have one or the other all of the time since Anjelly searches Hoot (owait). Saying you beat randoms on DN does not back your points up whatsoever. DN is full of scrubs and even if you say you beat good decks, it is probably just bad players netdecking them. EDIT: Actually, Copy and Paste this over everything instead of what Raging Earth said: [Spoiler Deck] 3x Madolche Magiliene 3x Madolche Messengelato 3x Madolche Hootcake 3x Madolche Anjelly 3x Madolche Mewfueille 2x Maxx "C" 2x Madolche Chateau 2x Madolche Ticket 2x Forbidden Lance 3x Mystical Space Typhoon 1x Dark Hole 3x Upstart Goblin 3x Reckless Greed 1x Madolchepalooza 1x Torrential Tribute 2x Mirror Force 1x Bottomless Trap Hole 1x Solemn Warning 1x Compulsory Evacuation Device 3x Madolche Queen Tiaramisu 2x M-X Saber InvokerS 1x Maestroke the Symphony Djinn 1x Number 101: Silent Honor ARK 1x Abyss Dweller 1x Number 106: Giant Hand 1x Leviair the Sea Dragon 1x Number 17: Leviathan Dragon 1x Wind-Up Zenmaines 1x Number 50: Blackship of Corn 1x Diamond Dire Wolf 1x Gagaga Cowboy copy and paste that in over everything other than that the build is actual bad like why are you using 3 ticket and chateau when its easily searchable and you dont want to draw it [/Spoiler] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slinky Posted April 24, 2014 Report Share Posted April 24, 2014 Hey guys, maybe you should stfu? Maybe its a TCG deck? where Angelly doesn't exist yet? -wishful thinking- Also, you guys need to cool it with the confrontational attitude. Yes, the deck is hilariously bad. But there is no need to flame the guy. He already said on multiple occasions that he is willing to take advice so long as it doesn't involve Angelly. There is nothing wrong with having a preference on how to play a deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kazooie Posted April 24, 2014 Report Share Posted April 24, 2014 Hey guys, maybe you should stfu? Maybe its a TCG deck? where Angelly doesn't exist yet? -wishful thinking- Madolches do not need Angelly. This deck runs phenomenally. If you have a problem with the deck, don't post in the thread. But yes. I do not have plans to run Angelly in this build. If I decide to try Angelly, I will make a seperate deck on DN. But this will not have Angelly, to show that the deck does not need it. Also, I don't want a broken deck. And I don't think anyone wants to play against a broken deck. I get enough rage quits as it is, I don't want people to scoop as soon as I summon Angelly. He literally does not want to run it just because he think it's broken and doesn't want to cause ragequits, which is all Madolche are really supposed to do. It increases constancy and he's running awful cards in its place. Not running Angelly in Madolche makes about as much sense as not running Batteryman 9V in Hunders. YEs you can have preferences, but that doesn't make your preferences immune to criticism when they're absolutely awful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slinky Posted April 24, 2014 Report Share Posted April 24, 2014 I never said ANYTHING about criticism. These guys weren't just criticizing him, they were flaming him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kazooie Posted April 25, 2014 Report Share Posted April 25, 2014 He started by violating the Jack Witt clause by stating in the first post that he would refuse to run Angelly. The card practically makes the deck. You can't see it now that he's deleted his "reasons" but it was a mess of "I refuse to take this out and I won't run this because I know best." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZeRainbowDash Posted April 25, 2014 Author Report Share Posted April 25, 2014 Yes, I have no intentions to run Angelly in THIS build. I have created a seperate deck with Angelly in it, but this is my original build and I have a personal fondness for the cards in it, notably maide and Baaple. I have yet to test it with Angelly, but atm it is just a TCG deck. And I'm not saying I know best, I'm saying that I know my build. I'm not saying that you guys don't know it or whatever. But I don't mind CONSTRUCTIVE criticism, which is criticism without people saying that I only win due to luck and that I play scrubs on DN. Constructive criticism is what YCMoron posted, and I thank him for that. Baaple and Maide and 3 chateau and ticket are my personal tech choices. And I won't lie. It does work very well. I love it with a passion. Which is why I set up the separate deck on DN, though I haven't had time to test it out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted April 25, 2014 Report Share Posted April 25, 2014 You don't play Angelly because people scoop. But only really bad scrubs are going to scoop just because they see Angelly, and given the bad build, there's no way you consistently win like you claim. And "3 chateau" is not a tech choice, nor is running multiples of bad cards. That's a horrible argument. If you're not trying to improve your deck to be the best it can be, don't play it. Hell, even TCG only this build's terrible because Maid and Baaple are terrible as is running 3 Ticket/Chateau. That's just being bad at deckbuilding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZeRainbowDash Posted April 25, 2014 Author Report Share Posted April 25, 2014 there's no way you consistently win like you claim. What proof do you have of this? Have you dueled me on DN? Have you watched all my duels? Have you somehow checked out my win/loss ratio with this deck? The answer to all these(with the exception of the first one, which is none) is no. You don't know how well this deck runs. You have never played against it. You have never seen me play with it. So don't tell me what I can and can't do while playing this deck. When you ave dueled it, or seen me duel with it, tell me this again, and give me proof. Until you do so, kindly stop telling me what you don't know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.