Canadian Posted March 11, 2014 Report Share Posted March 11, 2014 Hey look, its this thread again! Where should JD be on the next Banlist, if at all? Discuss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Not-so-Radiant Arin Posted March 11, 2014 Report Share Posted March 11, 2014 Ghost Rare version looks sexy. 0 Judgment Dragon or I start killing people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goddamnit names are a pain Posted March 11, 2014 Report Share Posted March 11, 2014 LET'S COUNT, SHALL WE? 3-3=0 SIMPLE MATH Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aix Posted March 11, 2014 Report Share Posted March 11, 2014 Ghost Rare version looks sexy. It's Ultimate Rare. Begone plz. 0. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asterr259 Posted March 11, 2014 Report Share Posted March 11, 2014 I haven't fought a recent LS deck, but I remember back in the day this card screwed me over quite a bit. But even so, banlist plz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wildflame Posted March 11, 2014 Report Share Posted March 11, 2014 Lightsworms are pretty legit now with the Ruler build, they deserve some attention. But knowing Konami, they might hit Lumina again, or Raiden, or even freaking Wulf before this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Βyakuya Posted March 11, 2014 Report Share Posted March 11, 2014 Go to 1 please. Not 0 to keep it as a decent LD boss and have Lightrays fill in, but Beckoning Light and Wyvern has had too much fun with this happy-go-lucky nuker and it's about time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted March 11, 2014 Report Share Posted March 11, 2014 Considering Ark is now a card, why do we still need this again?Oh, right, people won't play Sworns otherwise.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Posted March 11, 2014 Author Report Share Posted March 11, 2014 Considering Ark is now a card, why do we still need this again? Oh, right, people won't play Sworns otherwise.... They have a new Structure Deck coming out though. For that reason I highly doubt JD will get hit at all. If anything, we might get another Charge of the Light Brigade (dear god no). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted March 11, 2014 Report Share Posted March 11, 2014 DAD is at 1. JD never went lower than 2, and is currently at 3. WTF? JD is just too good at what it does. Unlike DAD, which requires Grave management, JD can be SSed if you have 4 or MORE Lightsworn. Sure, Deck dedication and all, but for a mere 1000, it nukes the whole Field except itself. And can attack still. And can nuke multiple times a turn, so even Gorz isn't a counter for the damn thing. Righteously, I feel it should be at 1. I know they gave Lightsworn new support and may want to keep the Deck kicking a bit, but Eclipse Wyvern can search it, and Dragon Rulers (them again...) help Eclipse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Synchronized Posted March 11, 2014 Report Share Posted March 11, 2014 I've always maintained that the most devastating card in Sworns is Charge of the Light Brigade. While this is broken and shouldn't really be at 1 nevermind 3, I'd much rather have this go to 1 or 2 and have Charge stay exactly where it is. The only thing Lightsworns lack is consistency and Charge more or less eliminates that problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mutant Monster RAEG-HAPYP Posted March 11, 2014 Report Share Posted March 11, 2014 Considering this is being reprinted in Premium Gold, I doubt they're gonna hit it at all. Though, it's not impossible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Warden Posted March 11, 2014 Report Share Posted March 11, 2014 Do we really need to talk about him again? We all know how this s*** goes down. For as much as we want too, this annoying bastard won't get it until LS become truly meta, and they won't because they're inconsistent. They sack wins out the yin-yang but that requires luck. LS Rulers right now are the top end, but, let's face it: The fault once again lies with those damn Rulers. Even at 1 those bastards still cause trouble, since they're now BFFs with the Hieratics and Eclipse Wyvern. Is the deck more consistent? Yes, but that's only because the Rulers don't give two shits whether they're in the hand or in the Grave. They WILL banish that milled Eclipse Wyvern and they WILL let you search JD because of it. Ban the Rulers, and the deck loses power by having to rely on Collapserpant and BLS/Chaos Sorc to banish the Eclipses. Or in other words, NOT run the Eclipses as its synergy was purely with the Rulers. The Rulers will get the chop no doubt in April, and as a result the deck will most likely turn back into a lucksacking mess. Will JD go with them? Probably not. Losing the Rulers in and of itself kills the deck's validity; JD will get away untouched like a catholic schoolgirl. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
werewolfjedi Posted March 11, 2014 Report Share Posted March 11, 2014 lightsworn don't need this at 3. PLEASE REDUCE, to any number less than 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepy Posted March 11, 2014 Report Share Posted March 11, 2014 LS have too many potential bosses, but I'd still ban this. It's stupid from design to actual impact. You shouldn't be able to drop more than one of these, to use it's effect more than once per turn, or to even require such a lousy pay for it. Heck it should have more restrictions/drawbacks than that. DAD in the other hand could go up a bit... it's not like you can stack DADs and re-banish your banished cards, and the times it was too strong or with much more destructive power than average are long gone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.