Discussion : Nobleman of Crossout

[CrabHelmet]

 

He's blond.

 

Discuss.

[b7hamma]

 

He's balding.

 

LOL FACE-DOWNS!

[Orochi]

he's lady oscar with a helmet...

 

 

ok, seriously, a good card but not for this meta... BTW, his limiting was because the UDE guys needed to potence shield crush or because they needed to give more importance to flips??

[Dark Supreme]

He is a human who thinks he is a tree.

 

Now no spamming. This card is not that good anymore. Who sets monsters, maybe Spirit Reaper and a few others, that's all. Flip are not used a lot.

 

This card should not be Limited.

[tonisanoob]

its good for removing face down monsters such as a spirit reaper or marshmallon or if somone last dich attempt to saty in the game set a treeborn, or anything for that matter

 

this card basically has no other uses

[loren]

a better card than him i think is sheild crush what do think

[Orochi]

why?

[Jerry OldMaster]

its good for removing face down monsters such as a spirit reaper or marshmallon or if somone last dich attempt to saty in the game set a treeborn' date=' or anything for that matter

 

this card basically has no other uses

[/quote']

 

Well, maybe there are tacktics with killing your own monsters with it. I dunno.

 

I luv that card though. In my country, Flip is used far more often... because everyone's afraid of Lighting Vortexs XD

[loren]

because sheild crush destoys any def monster face up or down, noble man can only remove one facedown from play and if its a flip effect look through both your decks for the card

[CrabHelmet]

because sheild crush destoys any def monster face up or down' date=' noble man can only remove one facedown from play and if its a flip effect look through both your decks for the card

[/quote']

 

Good job, you have stated the effects of each card. Now, explain why you think Shield Crush is better.

[God GAK]

Nobleman>SC

 

Nobleman kills decoichi, treeborn and the rest

[Guest PikaPerson01]

Shield Crush is better then Nobleman of Crossout.

 

However, NoC should still be either limited or banned.

[CrabHelmet]

Shield Crush is better then Nobleman of Crossout.

 

However' date=' NoC should still be either limited or banned.

[/quote']

 

Limited? This is a 3 or 0 card.

[Guest PikaPerson01]

Well, it definitely can't be three. That would make an entire sub-type of monsters, flips, unplayable.

 

Zero it is then.

[JesusofChaos™]

hes looks like hes trying to come onto me

[CrabHelmet]

Limiting this is Konami logic. The way I see it, Limited cards should be good for the game at 1 but bad for the game at 3. Mirror Force discourages overextending at 1, but heavily punishes aggro at 3; therefore, it goes to 1. This card provides nothing for the game at 1, so it should go to 0.

[tonisanoob]

sheild crush is better, its more direct. say you dont have a nobleman to hand your opponent sets spirit reaper, you attack. face up. nobleman would be a dead draw, buuut sheild crush aint. sure it means treeborn could still come back, but if you run any hint of macro then it wouldnt be a probleam ^_^

[CrabHelmet]

sheild crush is better' date=' its more direct. say you dont have a nobleman to hand your opponent sets spirit reaper, you attack. face up. nobleman would be a dead draw, buuut sheild crush aint. sure it means treeborn could still come back, but if you run any hint of macro then it wouldnt be a probleam ^_^

[/quote']

 

So, it's better in:

 

* One improbable situation

* A Macro deck

[Bfmvrocks]

Blonde* I think?

 

NoC > SC

 

Definately.

[tonisanoob]

sheild crush is better' date=' its more direct. say you dont have a nobleman to hand your opponent sets spirit reaper, you attack. face up. nobleman would be a dead draw, buuut sheild crush aint. sure it means treeborn could still come back, but if you run any hint of macro then it wouldnt be a probleam ^_^

[/quote']

 

So, it's better in:

 

* One improbable situation

* A Macro deck

 

 

well actually there is twice the chnce of getting a defence position monster(in general) than there is a face down defence position monster, at least i think thats the case personally i just totally prefer sheild crush (and its more an added bonus having it in a macro deck)

[Axiom_Nor]

NoC RFGs so its better, because not a lot of people run RFG revivals...

*thinks...*

 

yea... besides in the meta...

~_~

 

well, so against a deck where a RFG monster could come back, i rate them about the same.

[Cyber Altair]

i thought he was a girl for crying out load. lol anyway at least you get rid of a facedown like Marsh and other possible cards but still, it isn't such a good card.

[RedSceptile]

i thought he was a girl for crying out load. lol anyway at least you get rid of a facedown like Marsh and other possible cards but still' date=' it isn't such a good card.

[/quote']

 

Nobleman of Crossout.

 

>_>;;;

[Bfmvrocks]

Please get rid of that, it's repulsive, seriousley, and thanks for the Spamming, since you didn't say anything actually ABOUT Nobleman of Crossout, but included the one card in your sentence.

[CrabHelmet]

sheild crush is better' date=' its more direct. say you dont have a nobleman to hand your opponent sets spirit reaper, you attack. face up. nobleman would be a dead draw, buuut sheild crush aint. sure it means treeborn could still come back, but if you run any hint of macro then it wouldnt be a probleam ^_^

[/quote']

 

So, it's better in:

 

* One improbable situation

* A Macro deck

 

 

well actually there is twice the chnce of getting a defence position monster(in general) than there is a face down defence position monster, at least i think thats the case personally i just totally prefer sheild crush (and its more an added bonus having it in a macro deck)

 

Face-up Defense Position is rare. Defense Position monsters are almost always face-down. The versatility that Shield Crush provides isn't worth the lack of removal unless you're running a Macro deck.