goddamnit names are a pain Posted January 31, 2014 Report Share Posted January 31, 2014 I need some help with this. Getting down to 43 or less would be nice, but it works fine at 45. I am only running Numbers, with the Exception of Leo Arms. Do not try to get me to play Non-Numbers, I don't want that for this deck. I run Tri-Head Dust Dragon as a personal choice. He looks awesome, has a sweet effect, and is just fun to use. Troubull Diver is currently being tested. Considering Kagetokage, but already at 45.... Only "consistency" issue is Utopia One's effect. Which I avoid using now, unless I have too. Considering Black Corn for 101. I may go back to Three RUMS. And once Seventh comes out, I might just lelz EDITS: I finally gave in and 104 instead of Dust Head. RIP old buddy. EDIT TWO Dropped Troubull added 3rd RUM LBF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mugendramon Posted January 31, 2014 Report Share Posted January 31, 2014 Needs more C104. On that note, Tri-Head Dust Dragon is bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goddamnit names are a pain Posted January 31, 2014 Author Report Share Posted January 31, 2014 Needs more C104. On that note, Tri-Head Dust Dragon is bad. I've considered him. I liek Tri Dust Head. He is bad yes, but I like him. I like the idea of lockdown with Number Wall. But at this rate, he is out. XD Swap Dust Head for Normal 104 Now waht do for C104? And Add third RUM? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mugendramon Posted January 31, 2014 Report Share Posted January 31, 2014 Why are you running Crazy Box but no Viruses Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goddamnit names are a pain Posted February 1, 2014 Author Report Share Posted February 1, 2014 Why are you running Crazy Box but no Viruses Hahah He just got the axe earlier. 104+C104=awesum I used C104 EVERY TIME I could. It was fun to beat a troll/burn deck and dodge around the random 3 Timelord copies he had. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goddamnit names are a pain Posted February 2, 2014 Author Report Share Posted February 2, 2014 BUMP Edited, Troubull Removed, Limited RUM added. Well, technically I took out a Stardrawing a while back, but I am back at running him at 3. I feel the warrior restriction hurts Troubull too much. RUMs working fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premier Alexander Romanov Posted February 2, 2014 Report Share Posted February 2, 2014 Gee whiz, that looks familiar.I wonder where you got those ideas? :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wildflame Posted February 2, 2014 Report Share Posted February 2, 2014 You know that playing Upstart Goblin in something with more than 40 cards is literally the worst thing that you can do in a deck, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goddamnit names are a pain Posted February 3, 2014 Author Report Share Posted February 3, 2014 Gee whiz, that looks familiar. I wonder where you got those ideas? :P Mai deck is older. XD You know that playing Upstart Goblin in something with more than 40 cards is literally the worst thing that you can do in a deck, right? Actually, it fuels Summoner and still technically reduces deck count. It also gives the opponent more LP than me, which is kinda the point in Hope For Escape. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premier Alexander Romanov Posted February 3, 2014 Report Share Posted February 3, 2014 Mai deck is older.XDMai deck is mai RL deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kazooie Posted February 3, 2014 Report Share Posted February 3, 2014 Actually, it fuels Summoner and still technically reduces deck count. It also gives the opponent more LP than me, which is kinda the point in Hope For Escape. I won't argue the other two points at all, but you can't use the "Reduce Deck Count" argument when you could just run 42 cards instead of 45. I don't have a ton of experience with this deck, like at all, but Goblindburg just seems bad at 3 in general. Has it clogged? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premier Alexander Romanov Posted February 3, 2014 Report Share Posted February 3, 2014 I won't argue the other two points at all, but you can't use the "Reduce Deck Count" argument when you could just run 42 cards instead of 45. I don't have a ton of experience with this deck, like at all, but Goblindburg just seems bad at 3 in general. Has it clogged?...How does it clog? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goddamnit names are a pain Posted February 3, 2014 Author Report Share Posted February 3, 2014 Hasn't clogged yet. If anything, three Star Drawing clogs. And yeah that was a bad attempt at saying 42 cards. But that drawing by Star is just so good. http://i.imgur.com/yEkqoZp.png Worst hand yet. And I would say this is my IRL deck, but I'm about 20 cards short. XD I feel it would suck on deck count, but I need removal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.