Wildflame Posted January 24, 2014 Report Share Posted January 24, 2014 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yrG0u2rPYtk Deck is just bananas. Suggestions and stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted January 24, 2014 Report Share Posted January 24, 2014 Upstart over Reckless seems bad, and not running Blader is just plain stupid considering it wins the game if it resolves in the mirror and things like Merms that pop up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Althemia Posted January 24, 2014 Report Share Posted January 24, 2014 Only things I really have a problem with in the main is a lack of Raigeki Break. Also I would not play Wattail over Luster Dragon #2 because Luster is a WIND for the time you draw it and Tempest to search any Dragon. Neg a Big Eye and play Blader btw. You really only need 1 most of the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dog King Posted January 25, 2014 Report Share Posted January 25, 2014 Upstart over Reckless seems bad, and not running Blader is just plain stupid considering it wins the game if it resolves in the mirror and things like Merms that pop up. Upstart is better than Reckless in the deck but reckless can also be mained too for deck itself, im pretty sure you only really need 3 colours, im really unsure with this 3 cardcar d, 2 maxx c and 2 swift scarecrow that lineup seems a bit weird, like I would probably rather just like side the maxx c and/or scarecrow and for cardcar d im not sure if you really need it what I would play is maybe 2 call of the haunted since its actually really good here and maybe neb and or dragard in main Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slinky Posted January 25, 2014 Report Share Posted January 25, 2014 Just drop the Edrags. The deck will be much faster without them, and less derpy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mugendramon Posted January 25, 2014 Report Share Posted January 25, 2014 Just drop the Edrags. The deck will be much faster without them, and less derpy. You have got to be shitting me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dog King Posted January 25, 2014 Report Share Posted January 25, 2014 Just drop the Edrags. The deck will be much faster without them, and less derpy. sarcasm? because edrags is what makes this deck a good deck atm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wildflame Posted January 25, 2014 Author Report Share Posted January 25, 2014 Totes forgot that Luster #2 is WIND, putting it in instead of Watt. Hmm, yeah, will also do -1 Big Eye +1 Blader, although there have been times when I have needed that second one. Haven't tested Reckless in here, but I'm quite reluctant to doing it. Upstart seems like the safer choice, and it's also much faster. I like Cardcar + Scarecrow + Maxx C because they make dropping Redox very easy. But I'll probably drop the Maxx Cs for Debris + something else. Is Raigeki Break really that necessary?, I'm aware that it helps pitching dead vanillas and Rulers, but I don't know..., will probably try to tech one or two of them to see how it works. Oh, and also, -1 MST +1 Wingbeat, because nobody expects the Tefnuit inquisition. Just drop the Edrags. The deck will be much faster without them, and less derpy. I have also played Rulerless Hieratics this format, and trust me, this is both faster and more consistant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ihop Posted January 25, 2014 Report Share Posted January 25, 2014 Honestly I don't think Wattail is needed, Labradorite does all that Wattail does but it also makes Star Eater. I'd cut Wattail for Raigeki Break tbh but I really can't find a second card to neg so possibly there might be a better card than the 1 Raigeki Break. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wildflame Posted January 26, 2014 Author Report Share Posted January 26, 2014 Some of the bigger plays (mainly OTKs) involve two vanillas, and I'd rather keep Luster #2 (replaced Wattail with it) than add another Labradorite. The fact that it is a WIND, and its large ATK are helpful factors. Also, it's not like you need to make Star Eater that often, and whenever you want you can probably do it anyways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ihop Posted January 26, 2014 Report Share Posted January 26, 2014 Some of the bigger plays (mainly OTKs) involve two vanillas, and I'd rather keep Luster #2 (replaced Wattail with it) than add another Labradorite. The fact that it is a WIND, and its large ATK are helpful factors. Also, it's not like you need to make Star Eater that often, and whenever you want you can probably do it anyways. But you can just detach Labradorite for Atum. I'm not saying replace it with another Labradorite, that'd be even worse and I understand your point about Luster being a WIND but I feel Raigeki break would be a better way to get rid of dead vanillas than hope you get your 1 Tempest to hand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toralyon Posted February 1, 2014 Report Share Posted February 1, 2014 Some of the bigger plays (mainly OTKs) involve two vanillas, and I'd rather keep Luster #2 (replaced Wattail with it) than add another Labradorite. The fact that it is a WIND, and its large ATK are helpful factors. Also, it's not like you need to make Star Eater that often, and whenever you want you can probably do it anyways. The basic combo for a OTK is 3 hieratics, and u dont need 3 vanillas in this deck it gives it just more inconsistency (teff, su and another one)---> sumon teff special su, bring out first vanilla (labradorite), then u use either su eff pop a S/T card or tribute him for teff, su or eset. next special the last vanilla (flambwell). then XYZ atum, detach, summon blaster, sync for scrap, blow up monster if u can set something in S/T, and at last special blaster and gaia charger 2600+2800+2800=8200 and its game. so no u dont need 2 vanillas. and u dont need swift scarecrow, card car D and maxx c (reasons: card car D- u are 2 wournable with that low deffensive trap card count, maxx c- some of the main decks this card is useless are played now, bujin, NK, fire fist (4axis)...etc) and plz dont say its a redox fooder becouse redox is one dragon ruller 2 much in hieratics, and scarecrow is sometimes useless 2 becouse u will only stop one monsters atack (bujin, NK, fire fist (4axis)) Like i said in a previous thread, this deck lacks deffensive traps not hand traps and one less vanilla, shrine and ruller. and defenetly not 2 big eyes... in 20 games i have never brought it out once, even 2 sack is really rare. Hieratic rullers have becoe a grind deck, with seal from the ashes giving u infinate food for your rullers Try out this and u will see what i mean Just drop the Edrags. The deck will be much faster without them, and less derpy. if u think like this, then just... i have no words. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.