Envy 647 Posted January 7, 2014 Report Share Posted January 7, 2014 0.11.47.930 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~British Soul~ Posted January 7, 2014 Report Share Posted January 7, 2014 Ignoring the first line of the OP, I see a few things wrong with this deck: - There's no theme (Warrior.dek isn't a theme). - More to the point, there are too many one-offs and there isn't a win condition, and no, "Attack opponent's monsters with my monsters, then direct attack" isn't a win condition (unless the term swarm is involved). - Deck is illegal as there is too many cards. (Again, I'm ignoring the first line of the OP) - Monster Reborn and Heavy Storm are banned. (Even then, the deck still has too many cards) And don't say; "This Deck isn't for Tournament use, so therefore I can make it legal" because the rules on this forum beg to differ. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Envy 647 Posted January 7, 2014 Author Report Share Posted January 7, 2014 Ignoring the first line of the OP, I see a few things wrong with this deck: - There's no theme (Warrior.dek isn't a theme). - More to the point, there are too many one-offs and there isn't a win condition, and no, "Attack opponent's monsters with my monsters, then direct attack" isn't a win condition (unless the term swarm is involved). - Deck is illegal as there is too many cards. (Again, I'm ignoring the first line of the OP) - Monster Reborn and Heavy Storm are banned. (Even then, the deck still has too many cards) And don't say; "This Deck isn't for Tournament use, so therefore I can make it legal" because the rules on this forum beg to differ. It's really to bad people are more interested in idiot regulations rather than actual fun these days. I've beaten a tournament winning deck 3 times with this one without a scratch to my life-points, clearly since you've never used it you wouldn't be able to completely evaluate it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aix Posted January 7, 2014 Report Share Posted January 7, 2014 Sparks Why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~British Soul~ Posted January 7, 2014 Report Share Posted January 7, 2014 It's really too bad people are more interested in idiot regulations rather than actual fun these days. The rules aren't idiotic, they're there for a reason. I've beaten a tournament winning deck 3 times with this one without a scratch to my life-points, clearly since you've never used it you wouldn't be able to completely evaluate it. I don't need to use the deck to know that it's bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mugendramon Posted January 7, 2014 Report Share Posted January 7, 2014 It's really to bad people are more interested in idiot regulations rather than actual fun these days. I've beaten a tournament winning deck 3 times with this one without a scratch to my life-points, clearly since you've never used it you wouldn't be able to completely evaluate it. If I might ask... which tournament-winning Deck did you beat without a "scratch to your life points"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Envy 647 Posted January 7, 2014 Author Report Share Posted January 7, 2014 If I might ask... which tournament-winning Deck did you beat without a "scratch to your life points"? Some deck that consisted of Six Samurai, hell if I know. I'm deleting my account here anyway so it doesn't matter anymore now does it? Regardless I only heard it beat some Tournament, I didn't ask for details because I didn't care and the guy who told me that isn't exactly known for lying. Btw nice sig. And as for ~British Soul~ I'd whoop your ass in a duel any day with any rule set. But then again I'd bring real cards to the table instead of this practice deck that isn't even finished or designed for your oh-so-precious rule abiding tournaments in the first place. Without knowing the rule set I'm working on, you have no solid ground to actually critique the deck, so you're whole point is invalid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~British Soul~ Posted January 7, 2014 Report Share Posted January 7, 2014 Without knowing the rule set I'm working on, you have no solid ground to actually critique the deck, so you're whole point is invalid. Then, you should've posted your "oh-so-precious rule set" before posting these decks, so saying I have no solid ground to critique the deck when I don't know the rule set is invalid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aix Posted January 7, 2014 Report Share Posted January 7, 2014 What the hell is the point of posting a Deck like this here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mugendramon Posted January 7, 2014 Report Share Posted January 7, 2014 Some deck that consisted of Six Samurai, hell if I know. I'm deleting my account here anyway so it doesn't matter anymore now does it? Regardless I only heard it beat some Tournament, I didn't ask for details because I didn't care and the guy who told me that isn't exactly known for lying. Btw nice sig. Thanks, though I'm basically borrowing it. Now that you mention it, I should change it back. Now, back to that, Samurais aren't exactly tournament-winning, the variant you played against certainly was not. Yosu see, the issue here is, as British said, rather vague and contains several cards which are, pardon my french, shitty. Without knowing the rule set I'm working on, you have no solid ground to actually critique the deck, so you're whole point is invalid. Without knowing the rule set you're working on, why would you post the deck? It's clear that as it is, nobody understands it.What the hell is the point of posting a Deck like this here? I'd let him explain himself before jumping at his throat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dog King Posted January 7, 2014 Report Share Posted January 7, 2014 solid decklist, 9/10, youre missing reinforcement of the army no im just joking this deck is bad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.