Althemia Posted December 30, 2013 Report Share Posted December 30, 2013 [AUTO]:[Counter Blast (1)] When this unit is placed on (GC), if you have a vanguard with "Liberator" in its card name, you may pay the cost. If you do, this unit gets [Shield]+5000 for each of your «Gold Paladin» rear-guards until end of that battle.This actually looks as if it has a metric fuck-ton of potential Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legend Zero Posted December 30, 2013 Report Share Posted December 30, 2013 "oh my." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Hounds Of Anubis Posted December 30, 2013 Report Share Posted December 30, 2013 At the cost of CB1, being on average a 15k shield seems very nice. Problem is, of course, costing a CB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Althemia Posted December 30, 2013 Author Report Share Posted December 30, 2013 At the cost of CB1, being on average a 15k shield seems very nice. Problem is, of course, costing a CB.Might not be that bad, considering how cost-efficient and easy to sustain a board Gancelot is. And worst comes to worst? Still a 5000. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Hounds Of Anubis Posted December 30, 2013 Report Share Posted December 30, 2013 Problem is, all it is is shield. That's already a serious issue Sentinals have, and this magnifies it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Crouton Posted December 30, 2013 Report Share Posted December 30, 2013 A potential 1-card 30000 Shield for a CB1? Huh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maeriberii Haan Posted December 30, 2013 Report Share Posted December 30, 2013 Still miles better than Igraine tbh. Also, this is pretty much what you need for a budget Liberator deck. PGs/QWs can be replaced by this without much problems, except against things that break the 41k threshold. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
werewolfjedi Posted January 4, 2014 Report Share Posted January 4, 2014 I don't like this thing. it is over powered as fuck. if they were going to make an effect like this it should have been a sentiel that thing is 30K shield. it's not a could be up to a 30k, it's a 30k, cause it's the liberator archtype, which specializes on swarming the field. minimum 20k for only having the boosters. considering the randomness that is a Q.wall barely reaches 30k defenses, that makes this stronger than that. and this can trigger off the Q.wall. this is bad for the game on the design perspective, but at least it's on the defense, not the offense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Hounds Of Anubis Posted January 4, 2014 Report Share Posted January 4, 2014 It's not over powered at all. If anything it could still very easily be underpowered. 6ks are awful boosters. You're also not going to be playing this over Sentinels, so if you include them with Sentinels then you're giving yourself fewer and fewer good boosters. The fact that it also costs a CB doesn't help it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maeriberii Haan Posted January 4, 2014 Report Share Posted January 4, 2014 Hound of Anubis is right, except if you can't afford Marks, you'll run it before this, as this made you vulnerable to the top 3 clans currently(Kagero, Narukami, Link Joker). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Althemia Posted January 4, 2014 Author Report Share Posted January 4, 2014 Hound of Anubis is right, except if you can't afford Marks, you'll run it before this, as this made you vulnerable to the top 3 clans currently(Kagero, Narukami, Link Joker).cough REVENGERS coughThough that doesn't change that you have some incredibly poor match-up vs some of the best decks. Expecting whatever new boss Liberators get to fix that for them though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maeriberii Haan Posted January 5, 2014 Report Share Posted January 5, 2014 RIBENJAAA still leave you with at least 3 RGs though, while the other 3 eats more RGs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted January 6, 2014 Report Share Posted January 6, 2014 RIBENJAAA still leave you with at least 3 RGs though, while the other 3 eats more RGs. I think the point is that Revengers are in the top 2 decks in the game or so, not that this isn't relevant against them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.