Jump to content

[Finished]Extra deck summoning method contest *finished & results up*


I Hate Snatch Steal

Recommended Posts

Note: I only would have docked points for art if it didn't meet the rubric because I don't want to be too subjective.

 

Kwisatz-Haderach:

Art: 5

No issues with art style and it protrays what the card's name says it should

Balance 7

Stats are fine. The cannot be destroyed by battle effect makes it easier to use its 2nd effect. I had a feeling you had
using the monster as material for a summon in mind when you made this. However it does rely on your opponent doing something.

Creativity 8

This catagory is hard to comment on in general but I will say that this style of effect isn't seen very often.

-------------------------------
Rowling:

Art: 5

Style is fine and so on

Balance: 1

You only get to use this card once per duel, and drawing it when it would be useful is not going to happen very often.

Creativty 7:

Certainly outside the box.

-------------------------------
card creator 123:

Art: 5

Style is fine and so on

Balance: 4

You would need to protect this card for 5+ turns before you could get anything useful besides formula synchron or something similar.
Though formula synchron is a good combo with it

Creativty 6:

Adding counters is ok.
-----------------------

the_engineer:

Art: 5

Depicts what it says it should and style is fine.

Balance: 4

Potential game ender in the right deck, also it doesn't require any field/hand setup to summon.

Creativity: 9

I didn't see an effect like this coming when I made this contest. The details help it get a 10.

------------------
Goldendragonslayer922:

Art: 5

Depicts what it says it should and style is fine.

Balance: 1

Has the same issues as the_engineer's card, but the summoning requirement is WAYY easier.

Creativity 5:

The effects seem like they are more of a collage of other card's effects somehow, execpt for the summoning requirement.

------------
Cocodomoco:

Art: 5

Depicts what it says it should and style is fine.

Balance: 5

This is very hard to judge. The card requires setup, but it can't be destroyed by battle so that makes it easier. In order to summon something good you'd need a bit of setup though.

Creativity: 8

Well thought.

-------------
Hikari-chan:

Art: 5

Depicts what it says it should and style is fine.

Balance: 2

Way too easy to summon powerful monsters!

Creativity: 4

Seems kinda formulaic somehow

 

edit: almost left out someone [bad pun alert] and a later entry:

 

-someone-

 

Art: 5

Depicts what it says it should and style is fine.

Balance: 6

It only summons 1 monster at a time at the cost of normal summoning/setting, and is a liabiity to you if left alone, but I could see this being used well in the right deck

Creativity: 7

Out side the box enough for a good score

 

cece jones

 

Art: 5

Depicts what it says it should and style is fine.

Balance: 2

Really hard to activate unless you control this:

http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Elemental_Mistress_Doriado

 

and even then the monster is summoned in defense position and since this card is a trap, its disruptable not to mention half your life points is pretty steep.


Creativity: 4

Ok I guess, but that activation requirement has been done before by konami.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

alright since I heard it many times so I will post my score here, the rest is up to Sora (also I sent the half points I got to him, so he will be the only points giver)

 

Kwisatz-Haderach

B: 12 (wall effect is a bit much, also by ss Quasar and return it, you got free SSD)

C: 9

P: 8

Total: 29

Rowling

B: 17 (too specific condition, so it's a bit hard to use (just want to inform u that being a weak card didn't mean it will got 20 from balance))

C: 10

P: 9

Total: 36

card creator 123

B: 17 (as I mentioned above, weak card won't always got 20, also this thing has very confused OCG, if I scale this you probably got 0 ;))

C: 10

P: 8

Total: 35

the_engineer

B: 12 (flawless, until I read the last eff, wtf? just 10 or more Materials and gg?)

C: 10

P: 8.5

Total: 30.5

Goldendragonslayer922

B: 18 (Xyz monster that didn't have Xyz Material? also any DARK is a bit much)

C: 7 (I won't talk about ctrl+c,v so much, but its eff are a bit similar to the card b4 yours, so I have to deducted some points

P: 7

Total: 32

Cocodomoco

B: 19

C: 9

P: 8

Total: 36

-Someone-

B: 20

C: 9

P: 9

Total: 38

Hikari-chan

B: 19

C: 9

P: 9

Total: 37

Cece Jones

B: 19

C: 8

P: 9

Total: 36

 

look like there are many equal scores in my judgment XD, so hope you judge differently and can handle this problem, Sora ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sora has chosen to step down as a judge, so here goes

 

Final scoring:

 

Please tell me if my math is wrong here, its been a long day.

 

-Someone-

Total: 38 + 18 = 56

Cocodomoco

Total: 36 + 18 = 54

Kwisatz-Haderach

29 + 20 = 49

Rowling

36 + 13 = 49

Hikari-chan

Total: 37 + 11 = 49

the_engineer

30.5 + 18 = 48.5

Cece Jones

Total: 36 + 11 = 47

Goldendragonslayer922

32 + 11 = 43

card creator 123

35 + 15 = 40

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol [member='Scary Face'] you're such a weird judge...i had 12 of balance for a quasar that can easily s.summon ssd, then i wonder why Someone had 20 balance while it's card can do the same thing, well not actually, it summons a Xyz too later...also its quasar wouldn't have its effects negated while mine would, also mine "quasar" could be summoned only in certain conditions....what you have to say to this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...