Origin 뮤 Posted December 22, 2013 Report Share Posted December 22, 2013 "Blue-Eyes White Dragon"+"Blue-Eyes White Dragon" You can Special Summon this card from your Extra Deck by banishing the above cards from your side of the field and/or from your hand(Polymerization is not used). This Special Summon is treated as a Fusion Summon. Once per turn, if this card destroys an opponent's monster by battle: You can banish 1 LIGHT Dragon-Type in your Graveyard; this card can declare another attack this turn. If this card is destroyed by an opponent's card effect: Banish it; Special Summon 1 banished Fusion Material that was used to Summon this card. [hr] I am sure that the OCG can use some touching up here, but hopefully it is balanced. As always, all forms of constructive criticism are welcome :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lunar Origins Posted December 22, 2013 Report Share Posted December 22, 2013 If this is destroyed, banish this face up card? It's not face-up anymore. Honestly, I like it, but summoning the banished LIGHT Dragons seems a little much and adding to the hand seems the same. Then again, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ludisir Posted December 22, 2013 Report Share Posted December 22, 2013 I have issues with this card. Why didn't you just make it more like its cyber counterpart (who can have its attack quadrupled (and even further under the right cirumstances)); why does it need a cost to attack twice, and why not allow the use of poly? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mugendramon Posted December 22, 2013 Report Share Posted December 22, 2013 I'm afraid it's a bit too good. Let me put it simply, so I don't have to go in-detail. As long as this is a card, you can't just let it be summoned from graveyard materials WITHOUT a fusion spell. I mean Dragon's Mirror is a card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Origin 뮤 Posted December 22, 2013 Author Report Share Posted December 22, 2013 I have issues with this card. Why didn't you just make it more like its cyber counterpart (who can have its attack quadrupled (and even further under the right cirumstances)); why does it need a cost to attack twice, and why not allow the use of poly? Because I didn't want to make a carbon copy of an already existing card. As it is, this card probably opens up a creative OTK if used right, and if not can do a significant amount of damage anyway. If this is destroyed, banish this face up card? It's not face-up anymore. Honestly, I like it, but summoning the banished LIGHT Dragons seems a little much and adding to the hand seems the same. Then again, Thanks for the OCG fix, will correct. Also will get rid of that clause I'm afraid it's a bit too good. Let me put it simply, so I don't have to go in-detail. As long as this is a card, you can't just let it be summoned from graveyard materials WITHOUT a fusion spell. I mean Dragon's Mirror is a card. With the above edit do you think it is possible for it to be balanced or does it need a total rehaul? EDIT: Alright I did some changes to hopefully balance it out a little more. It still may not be to the level it needs to be though, but at least you can summon this guy and then turn around and summon another with Dragon's Mirror now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
razzy Posted December 22, 2013 Report Share Posted December 22, 2013 Not too bad imo. It is Blue Eyes support which is always going to be around/happen. Not sure if you know/meant to do this but the summoning condition says or. So you'd either need both in hand or both on field. Which hinders it. If you wanted it to be from both put "and/or". I think once per turn would be good for the effect. Twice just seems like too much. And usually cards say "can make another attack, in a row" or something to that effect. This helps balance them by making them attack monsters before making a direct attack, and so people know when the monster can attack again. And assuming you meant for the text under the card to be the most current I'd just put it as "Special Summon 1 of your "Blue-Eyes White Dragon" that is banished" I think that would help avoid some confusion. I'd say 4/5 overall :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Origin 뮤 Posted December 22, 2013 Author Report Share Posted December 22, 2013 Not too bad imo. It is Blue Eyes support which is always going to be around/happen. Not sure if you know/meant to do this but the summoning condition says or. So you'd either need both in hand or both on field. Which hinders it. If you wanted it to be from both put "and/or". I think once per turn would be good for the effect. Twice just seems like too much. And usually cards say "can make another attack, in a row" or something to that effect. This helps balance them by making them attack monsters before making a direct attack, and so people know when the monster can attack again. And assuming you meant for the text under the card to be the most current I'd just put it as "Special Summon 1 of your "Blue-Eyes White Dragon" that is banished" I think that would help avoid some confusion. I'd say 4/5 overall :D Thank you for the review and OCG corrections. Edits have been made, but I left the last clause as is. That way you can't just banish a Blue-Eyes with Eclipse and get it back, plus it opens up the possibility of getting King of the Swamp back from the grave if used to summon it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
razzy Posted December 22, 2013 Report Share Posted December 22, 2013 Thank you for the review and OCG corrections. Edits have been made, but I left the last clause as is. That way you can't just banish a Blue-Eyes with Eclipse and get it back, plus it opens up the possibility of getting King of the Swamp back from the grave if used to summon it. Yeah I did think about that. Just thought it would be simpler since you can only have 3 BEWD, and not have to keep track of which specific one(s) you fusion summoned with. And plus you'd want to save them in Graveyard for the ATK eff. But I think it works either way :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShootingStardust Posted December 24, 2013 Report Share Posted December 24, 2013 Cool! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.