Jump to content

Forum-wide Roleplay Planning Thread


Aix

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 83
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Well the world is based on Fantasy correct? So things around that would be neat. Also, you noted that the area is mostly separated by inhospitable areas. It also seems that it's quite possible that where there is actually civilizations, those civilizations are different from each other. Which adds room for a good variety intelligent races.

 

So Golems, Elves, Mind Flayer like, Dwarves, Harpies/Sirens, Serpent, Lizard, Dragon, Hybrid races could be neat choices.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why don't we all pick races we want?

 

Also, why not some original races?

 

Cifer Race - a humanoid race with translucent and bioluminescent skin (because why the fuck not). Underground dwellers.

 

I'd say that all sentient (and maybe humanoid, YMMV on this one) races should be playable.

Because of how the storyline works, we can't actually just have whatever race appear. It doesn't become quite so plausible. Some danger areas I intend to be more dangerous than others and these often divide places.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Onto other things then. The magic system. How shall it work?

 

Using life energies, source can be from self or other living beings (but harnessing natural energies is possible, though that'll be a lot harder). The magics itself are bound into will, yet manifested itself with words (making calling your attack as an actual mechanic).

 

The magic used for an action will be equal to the amount of energy you spend to do that certain action.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Using life energies, source can be from self or other living beings (but harnessing natural energies is possible, though that'll be a lot harder). The magics itself are bound into will, yet manifested itself with words (making calling your attack as an actual mechanic).

 

The magic used for an action will be equal to the amount of energy you spend to do that certain action.

So basically the Eragon system?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds decent, but by the sounds of it if the magic is bound to will, the words calling the attacks are just a way of focussing the will, which would allow nonverbal attacks as well, so long as the guiding will is strong enough. That actually reminds me of magic from the Harry Potter series as much as from Eragon. Same theory though, but for that matter would it be better to use a tool as a focus for that magic or just cast the magic without something like a wand or a staff to help guide it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd say both. Since the basis for the spell itself is in the willpower, both scenarios are plausible. Tool assisted vs no tools will have their advantages and disadvantages though.

 

(Also, I don't really object the nonverbal spells, I just say that the system for it in the books is not as well defined as the verbal ones).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, in that case it seems like the most important components for the magic would be the caster's willpower and the amount of energy they have available to cast the particular spell or piece of magic. With the tools and the words to cast them, it might act as a sort of crutch for those without enough focus to cast the more difficult spells they would otherwise have trouble with, and make the easier spells just that much easier to cast, though possibly at the cost of limiting the power capable of being fuelled into the spell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...