Jump to content

Ghostrick Support 13/? more to come

outlaw1994

By outlaw1994
in Realistic Cards

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply
razzy Newbie

razzy

Posted
Posted

Greaper - Neat effect, just wondering why you don't have it just Special Summon itself?

Vampire - Seems nice and one of the kickstarters every deck needs/has

Gargoyle - Interesting burn damage, but I feel it may be a little too much (the double damage for the field spell)

Werewolf - Maybe add the effect of if you control a Ghostrick Xyz you can summon that monster face-up instead? 

Zilla - Combo'd with Ghoul is really OP imo, but I think it is one of those things you can never really tell until it's used in practice. 

Scarecrow - Why does it say rearrange face-down Def monsters, then return them face-down??

Nekark - very similar to Alucard. But glad to see it requires ghostrick other than any lv 3. otherwise any deck can abuse both...

Devil - good. no real comment other than in part of its effect I don't believe the word flip is supposed to be capitalized.

Patch - Kind of confusing. Did you mean draw 1 card for each?

Path - I believe the card text is slightly off. I'm confused as to what part you want as a cost and what part as effect. The way it is now, the targeting and returning is a cost, and adding the other ghostrick card is the effect. I'm confused because you capitalized Return. Also it seems too powerful in that it is an instant search (Set monster -> Path -> Mary?/whatever) I would say consider turning it into a Trap that activates when your opponent attacks a face-down or ghostrick, return that monster to hand and add another?

 

Hopefully that helps :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
outlaw1994 Newbie

outlaw1994

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Greaper - Neat effect, just wondering why you don't have it just Special Summon itself?

Vampire - Seems nice and one of the kickstarters every deck needs/has

Gargoyle - Interesting burn damage, but I feel it may be a little too much (the double damage for the field spell)

Werewolf - Maybe add the effect of if you control a Ghostrick Xyz you can summon that monster face-up instead? 

Zilla - Combo'd with Ghoul is really OP imo, but I think it is one of those things you can never really tell until it's used in practice. 

Scarecrow - Why does it say rearrange face-down Def monsters, then return them face-down??

Nekark - very similar to Alucard. But glad to see it requires ghostrick other than any lv 3. otherwise any deck can abuse both...

Devil - good. no real comment other than in part of its effect I don't believe the word flip is supposed to be capitalized.

Patch - Kind of confusing. Did you mean draw 1 card for each?

Path - I believe the card text is slightly off. I'm confused as to what part you want as a cost and what part as effect. The way it is now, the targeting and returning is a cost, and adding the other ghostrick card is the effect. I'm confused because you capitalized Return. Also it seems too powerful in that it is an instant search (Set monster -> Path -> Mary?/whatever) I would say consider turning it into a Trap that activates when your opponent attacks a face-down or ghostrick, return that monster to hand and add another?

 

Hopefully that helps :)

ok it does help and hears the answers

 

Greaper - Neat effect, just wondering why you don't have it just Special Summon itself? i thought it better to have it special summon a monster from the grave.

Vampire - Seems nice and one of the kickstarters every deck needs/has. thanks

Gargoyle - Interesting burn damage, but I feel it may be a little too much (the double damage for the field spell) as pointed out before only does double with museum as mansion halves it.

Werewolf - Maybe add the effect of if you control a Ghostrick Xyz you can summon that monster face-up instead? might think about it as ghostricks usually prefer facedown 

Zilla - Combo'd with Ghoul is really OP imo, but I think it is one of those things you can never really tell until it's used in practice. this card was just meant to be a beater and nothing else really though i might lower the atk a bit

Scarecrow - Why does it say rearrange face-down Def monsters, then return them face-down?? i got the ocg from the only other card that has that effect shifting shadows

Nekark - very similar to Alucard. But glad to see it requires ghostrick other than any lv 3. otherwise any deck can abuse both... it would be too powerful for a tourguide summon i was disputing between making it 3 level 3 monsters or 2 level 3 ghostricks

Devil - good. no real comment other than in part of its effect I don't believe the word flip is supposed to be capitalized. i will fix up the ocg on it thanks

Patch - Kind of confusing. Did you mean draw 1 card for each? no just 1 card originally it was 1 for each but that made it too powerful

Path - I believe the card text is slightly off. I'm confused as to what part you want as a cost and what part as effect. The way it is now, the targeting and returning is a cost, and adding the other ghostrick card is the effect. I'm confused because you capitalized Return. Also it seems too powerful in that it is an instant search (Set monster -> Path -> Mary?/whatever) I would say consider turning it into a Trap that activates when your opponent attacks a face-down or ghostrick, return that monster to hand and add another? the return was meant to be a cost and the add the effect. its original idea was to recycle the hand traps and add a monster as well but might have to add an extra cost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
razzy Newbie

razzy

Posted
Posted

Gargoyle - How would Mansion half the damage? 

 

Ghostrick Mansion

Monsters cannot attack face-down Defense Position monsters, but can attack directly if all monsters their opponent controls are face-down Defense Position. All effect damage, and battle damage inflicted by monsters other than "Ghostrick" monsters, is halved.

 

Werewolf - I'm all for the face-down thing, was just trying to add some more ways to combo with the Deck.

Scarecrow - Ah okay never heard of that card before lol. Seems kind of old, so maybe there is a new way/style to word it?

Nekarak - my thoughts exactly

 

Path 

here's an idea:

Ghostrick Path

Spell Quick-play

If all the monsters on the field are "Ghostrick" and/or" face-down Defense Position monsters (min. 1): Return 1 "Ghostrick" or face-down Defense Position monster you control to the hand;  add 1 "Ghostrick" card from your deck to your hand, except "Ghostrick Path".

That way you'd have to work on getting your opponent's face-down too. And maybe change it to add a Ghostrick Spell/Trap instead of any card?

 

Cxyz Alucard - Maybe just a slit wording change.

 

Your opponent cannot target other "Ghostrick" monsters, or any face-down Defense Position monsters, with card effects or for attacks.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
outlaw1994 Newbie

outlaw1994

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Gargoyle - How would Mansion half the damage? 

 

 

Werewolf - I'm all for the face-down thing, was just trying to add some more ways to combo with the Deck.

Scarecrow - Ah okay never heard of that card before lol. Seems kind of old, so maybe there is a new way/style to word it?

Nekarak - my thoughts exactly

 

Path 

here's an idea:

That way you'd have to work on getting your opponent's face-down too. And maybe change it to add a Ghostrick Spell/Trap instead of any card?

 

Cxyz Alucard - Maybe just a slit wording change.

once again thanks about how mansion works its in the wording

 

"All effect damage, and battle damage inflicted by monsters other than "Ghostrick" monsters, is halved."

What that sentence is saying is two things:
1.) All effect damage is halved.
2.) All battle damage inflicted by monsters other than "Ghostrick" monsters is halved.
So as a result, every form of damage except Ghostrick battle damage is halved. That means Ghostrick effect damage is still affected by Mansion's halving. The placement of commas is VERY important. If it said "all effect damage and battle damage inflicted by monsters other than 'Ghostrick' monsters is halved", then you would be correct. HOWEVER, the commas convey something entirely different, separating the "effect damage" and "battle damage inflicted by non-Ghostricks" into two different things to be halved. 

 

werewolf i will add it just for fun

 

scarecrow maybe not exactly sure as shifting shadow and wandering mummy are the only cards that have this effect that i know of and psct doesnt have anything on this

 

nekark thanks

 

path ok will add that

 

dracula ok will fix

Link to comment
Share on other sites
razzy Newbie

razzy

Posted
Posted


once again thanks about how mansion works its in the wording

 

"All effect damage, and battle damage inflicted by monsters other than "Ghostrick" monsters, is halved."

What that sentence is saying is two things:
1.) All effect damage is halved.
2.) All battle damage inflicted by monsters other than "Ghostrick" monsters is halved.
So as a result, every form of damage except Ghostrick battle damage is halved. That means Ghostrick effect damage is still affected by Mansion's halving. The placement of commas is VERY important. If it said "all effect damage and battle damage inflicted by monsters other than 'Ghostrick' monsters is halved", then you would be correct. HOWEVER, the commas convey something entirely different, separating the "effect damage" and "battle damage inflicted by non-Ghostricks" into two different things to be halved. 

 

Sorry I was not aware that it worked that way. I am kind of new and know that comma placement and other punctuation are very important. But in that insistence if they meant all effect damage, they would've made it separate sentences, in my mind anyway. But now I am seeing it. :p

Link to comment
Share on other sites
outlaw1994 Newbie

outlaw1994

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Sorry I was not aware that it worked that way. I am kind of new and know that comma placement and other punctuation are very important. But in that insistence if they meant all effect damage, they would've made it separate sentences, in my mind anyway. But now I am seeing it. :P

ik i thought the same until a friend pointed it out lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...