Slade Posted March 17, 2008 Report Share Posted March 17, 2008 I wanted to enter the "Are you the best cardmaker on this site?" contest, and I want my card to be absolutely perfect, as well as realistic. How should I word this? Is it overpowered? EDIT: Well, I might want to wait a bit before entering, but I still want help for my ultimate card. This card gains 500 ATK for each WATER-type monster on your side of the field. This card loses 400 ATK for each FIRE-type monster on your opponent's side of the field. You can discard one card to negate the effect of an opponent's Spell or Monster card that targets this card. Please post your thoughts & opinions! Link to comment
Yu-gi-oh my gosh! Posted March 23, 2008 Report Share Posted March 23, 2008 No your just a nob so dont bother... (joking). Its me mike from school. ANYWAY...I think it's good. hey check out my recent threads and check out my kirby cards! i have more, there just not posted :P Link to comment
72night Posted March 23, 2008 Report Share Posted March 23, 2008 Why don't ya check with Dj.. >_> Anyways.This card gains 500 ATK for each WATER-type monster on your side of the field. This card loses 400 ATK for each FIRE-type monster on your opponent's side of the field. You can discard one card to negate the effect of an opponent's Spell or Monster card that targets this card. O, sorry, I sometimes play around with those, XD. Ok, here are the corrections. "Increase the ATK of this card by 500 for every face-up WATER monster on your side of the field. Decrease the ATK of this card by 400 for every FIRE monster on your opponent's side of the field. You may discard 1 card from your hand to the Graveyard to negate the effects of your opponent's Spell Cards or Effect Monsters that designate this card." Not to sure about the Effect Monster thing. >_> (Funny how when I look at the negating Spell Cards effects, I always look at my Silent Swordsman LV3, lol.) Rep appreciated... lol. \/ *Extra comment, =P(Separate comment...) If you don't specify rather your card is face-up or face-down, how will you know rather the effect would be applied? That part is common sense... You can/may... Sounds better, not sure if it's wrong to say 'can' though... effects. Unless your saying that you can activate this effect once, your implying you can use it more than once... Spell Cards... Monster Card? That doesn't make any sense, unless your talking about a attack, I assume your not, so Effect Monster. Negate the effects of your opponent's Spell Cards that designate this card." Came directly from "Silent Swordsman LV3" Link to comment
Faded Posted March 23, 2008 Report Share Posted March 23, 2008 Increase the ATK of this card by 500 for every WATER Monster on your side of the field. Decrease the ATK of this card for every FIRE Monster on your opponent's side of the field. You can discard 1 card to negate the effect of an opponent's Spell or Monster Card that targets this monster. Link to comment
72night Posted March 23, 2008 Report Share Posted March 23, 2008 ^ Monster. Monster doesn't have to be capitalized unless it starts the sentence or if your using it was a Monster Card or Monster Card Zone sense. EDIT: I meant, your using 'Monster Card' in a wrong sense. =/ Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.