Sora1499 Posted October 6, 2013 Report Share Posted October 6, 2013 Rules 1. All YCM and Leaderboard rules spply. 2. First to 3 votes or most votes by October 13th wins. 3. Submit your card to me via PM without any form of identification on it (creator name, set number, etc.) 4. Getcho card to me ASAP. 5. Follow the card requirements. 6. Only Mugendramon may join this contest. Card Requirements: Make a level 4 or lower monster with 2000 or more ATK. [spoiler='Card A']Cherished Watchdog [Beast/Effect] This card cannot attack. During you Main Phase 1, if this card was Normal Summoned: you can Tribute it; add 1 monster from your Deck to your hand with the same Level and higher ATK than this card's. You cannot Special Summon on the turn you activate this effect. If a monster with the same name as the added monster is destroyed while this card is in the Graveyard: you can banish it; Special Summon this card with its effect negated. 2200 / 0[/spoiler] [spoiler='Card B'] [spoiler='Lore']This card cannot declare an attack. When this card is targeted for an attack: Return this card to the hand, then send 1 card from your hand to the Graveyard. Once per turn: You can target 1 monster your opponent controls; destroy that target, then inflict 1000 damage to your opponent. During the End Phase of a turn you used this effect, destroy this card, then draw 1 card.[/spoiler][/spoiler] Prepare to be beaten shamefully. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mugendramon Posted October 6, 2013 Report Share Posted October 6, 2013 You people and your not taking written cards is getting on my nerves. Sigh, I'll get on to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sora1499 Posted October 6, 2013 Author Report Share Posted October 6, 2013 You people and your not taking written cards is getting on my nerves. Sigh, I'll get on to it. Actually written cards are ok. Unless the leaderboard says they're not. In which case, fuck the leaderboard, written cards are ok. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sora1499 Posted October 6, 2013 Author Report Share Posted October 6, 2013 Let the voting commence! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northern Sage Posted October 6, 2013 Report Share Posted October 6, 2013 Card B is just too good. A costless Blackship of Corn on a searchable 2k body? Now granted, there is the small issue of the self-destruction, but you're still getting a draw, plus it can be revived without repercussions. Now, for Card A, the search effect is powerful, but reasonably less abusable due to the restriction. Vote for Card A. (Also, people, the Card A and B system is only going to do so much if you have a distinctive presentation style…) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maeriberii Haan Posted October 6, 2013 Report Share Posted October 6, 2013 Honestly, Card A is really weak, since most of its search targets sucked and it has way too many restrictions. Should've 2K attack so it can search Thrasher. And card B is too powerful, since Xyz summoning exists(allowing double black corn), and even if it get popped by it's own effect, it'll still be a +1 due to the draw. Eventhough both cards are bad(even if the reason is really different for each card), I had to pick card A due to it not breaking anything in half. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sora1499 Posted October 6, 2013 Author Report Share Posted October 6, 2013 1-0 card A Keep em comin! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mugendramon Posted October 6, 2013 Report Share Posted October 6, 2013 1-0 card A Keep em comin! That's two votes already Sora. 2-0. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sora1499 Posted October 6, 2013 Author Report Share Posted October 6, 2013 Curses, foiled again! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mugendramon Posted October 7, 2013 Report Share Posted October 7, 2013 [acronym="Chariot Bump.jpg"][/acronym] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted October 7, 2013 Report Share Posted October 7, 2013 The issue with Phantom, is that it's "Cant attack" drawback, basically, doesn't exist.I mean, aside from the fact it's searchable by RotA/Summoner Monk/etc, it has free-range of what it can destroy. And even if it does destroys itself in the End Phase, it replaces itself. So basically you loose no real advantage with it considering the fact it destroys things whenever and even nets you a draw.Card A at least has some shenanigans to it without being over-the-top ridiculous.Card A gets my vote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mugendramon Posted October 7, 2013 Report Share Posted October 7, 2013 Okay so I guess I win. gg Sora. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mugendramon Posted October 7, 2013 Report Share Posted October 7, 2013 Still, as I did with Therrion, here is your Gratuitous Review on the opponent's card. Your card didn't actually have any fatal design flaw- it's a solid card which can work by itself and synergizes with a few Decks. But as Arm pointed out, it doesn't even need to attack. Its effect is a +1 as the card you get rid of is not balanced out by losing this card, as you get a free draw anyway. Furthermore it can be retrieved by a few cards which make it even more problematic. Being searchable off Monk is enough to be a problem since you can pop something then Xyz with it- but then you add to it the fact that some unplayed crap like the Warrior Returning Alive turns into a +1 comparable to Recurring Nightmare or Salvage, it goes a bit overboard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sora1499 Posted October 7, 2013 Author Report Share Posted October 7, 2013 Forgive me father, for I have losed. Thanks for the review Mugen. Perhaps I should have added a "This card cannot use the effect during the turn it is SS'd", but oh well. Good match. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.