Guest PikaPerson01 Posted March 17, 2008 Report Share Posted March 17, 2008 Effect:When this card battles with your opponent's monster, after damage calculation, you can remove from play the opponent's monster and this card. Attack: 1500Defense: 1600 Current Status: Limited. This card should be unlimited. Let discussion commence from here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b7hamma Posted March 17, 2008 Report Share Posted March 17, 2008 It shouldn't be unlimited nor limited, you should be able to use 1.5 DDWL in your deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted March 17, 2008 Report Share Posted March 17, 2008 It's 1-for-1 removal, which isn't broken. Unlike Smashing Ground, it has legs, but it also costs you a bit of your own field advantage. It's searchable, which means that Limiting it is less effective. Even a single one can be recursed through Return, D.D.R., and so on, and with Arms Hole tutoring D.D.R. and this card being searchable, running this at 1 is like running it at 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted March 17, 2008 Report Share Posted March 17, 2008 You've gotta think, when this was first limited the cards were different. Nowadays this card isn't as useful, mainly because they're almost all running Dimension Fusion, making their removed monster just return to the field. ((Those using Diamond Dude can even do it for free)) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyber Altair Posted March 17, 2008 Report Share Posted March 17, 2008 meh. i couldn't care less. even if i ran a D.D deck i wouldn't put more then 1 but i dont see why it deserves to be Limited? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted March 17, 2008 Report Share Posted March 17, 2008 i say no keep it wer it is Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted March 17, 2008 Report Share Posted March 17, 2008 i saw no keep it wer it is ... Everyone's at least provided some sort of insight. "There's no harm in putting it at 3." etc etc. How 'bout you do the same instead of always living up to your username? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Faded Posted March 17, 2008 Report Share Posted March 17, 2008 leave it as is Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted March 17, 2008 Report Share Posted March 17, 2008 well actually let me give a better oppinion yes we may as well have this at 3 as right now in this format it really proves no threat, even a man eater bug has slightly more ptential than this (due to the fact that you can pick wich monster you want destroyed), despite this having rfg abillities it only counts toward the monster that attacks it, and most people attack with their weakest monster first (well i do anyway) this really should never have been limited in the first place also no im not a n00b despite recent things that would say other wise >.< yes this thread, and the whole justi break thing but thats really all i can see as of late anyhoo. i would actually liek to see you give an on topic post on a thread for once btw Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chaos Pudding Posted March 17, 2008 Report Share Posted March 17, 2008 This card being Limited really doesn't make much sense. It's a 1-1 monster-removal monster that is slower than Exiled, yet Exiled is unlimited. Sure, DDWL removes, but in this meta, remove is pretty much as good as being in the Graveyard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted March 17, 2008 Report Share Posted March 17, 2008 yhea what cp said also ^_^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gravitize Me Cap'n! Posted March 17, 2008 Report Share Posted March 17, 2008 due to the fact that you can pick wich monster you want destroyed Because you totally can't just choose who to attack with DDWL right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted March 17, 2008 Report Share Posted March 17, 2008 well actually let me give a better oppinion yes we may as well have this at 3 What the hell? You just... completely changed your opinion. >_> i would actually liek to see you give an on topic post on a thread for once btw ... You mean me? Uhh... the first post was so on-topic, it was THE topic, and the second post I made here was to keep everything else on-topic. It's a "discussion" not a cluster**** of stupid ideas. I have no explanation for this third post however. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted March 17, 2008 Report Share Posted March 17, 2008 i was talking about other threads but yhea i did change my mind i really dunno why probably bcos im not feeling well and reilised my mistake from my drowsy posting also could you plox remove neg rep Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Black Fang Posted March 17, 2008 Report Share Posted March 17, 2008 well, it gets really annoying basically.. like if u finnaly Ritual/fusion summon and u attack a f/d card and its D.D. lady then all work is gone to waste.. i think itll stay limited... since u can get it wit sangan and other things... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted March 17, 2008 Report Share Posted March 17, 2008 well as long as you use fusion card that fuse from grave i.e overload fusion your not really missing much Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Black Fang Posted March 17, 2008 Report Share Posted March 17, 2008 well as long as you use fusion card that fuse from grave i.e overload fusion your not really missing much regardless.. its still a very annoying card... :/ and its also a light type and a warrior so its got decent support. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted March 17, 2008 Report Share Posted March 17, 2008 true but it is only one monster, and sure even if it was at 3 most people would only run 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted March 17, 2008 Report Share Posted March 17, 2008 well, it gets really annoying basically.. like if u finnaly Ritual/fusion summon and u attack a f/d card and its D.D. lady then all work is gone to waste.. i think itll stay limited... since u can get it wit sangan and other things... Then let's limit Sakuretsu Armor and Dimension Prison as well! [/sarcasm] Those cards are hurt by their own design, by being only SS-able by a Fusion Summon or a Ritual Summon. D.D. Warrior Lady at 1, 3, or 7 wouldn't in anyway make your pathetic card any better. and its also a light type and a warrior so its got decent support. Lol, light type support. Shining Angel and then... nothing else worth mentioning competitively. (And Shining Angel is stretching it) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Black Fang Posted March 17, 2008 Report Share Posted March 17, 2008 true but it is only one monster' date=' and sure even if it was at 3 most people would only run 1[/quote'] yes, i gotta go with you there, i would only run 1 my self... and id only put them in a deck i make that has no theme. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted March 17, 2008 Report Share Posted March 17, 2008 yes exactly O_O thats where my pal has one in his cookie cutter deck its okayish Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted March 17, 2008 Report Share Posted March 17, 2008 true but it is only one monster' date=' and sure even if it was at 3 most people would only run 1[/quote'] Exactly my point. If most people wouldn't even run it at 3, why limit the deck building of the few that do want it at 3? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted March 17, 2008 Report Share Posted March 17, 2008 exactly its liek limiting snipe hunter why would you need 3 when its VERY searchable Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b7hamma Posted March 17, 2008 Report Share Posted March 17, 2008 HAY GUYZ, remember when Assaillant was limited? Is it a problem now? Exactly my point. If most people wouldn't even run it at 3' date=' why limit the deck building of the few that do want it at 3?[/quote'] I WANNA RUN 3! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted March 17, 2008 Report Share Posted March 17, 2008 exactly its liek limiting snipe hunter why would you need 3 when its VERY searchable No. >_> Snipe Hunter deserves to be banned. DD Warrior Lady deserves to be unlimited. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.