Jump to content

Chandelure-EX (Legendary Treasures 77)


Azuh

Recommended Posts

Non-legendaries have been given EX status for a long time. I remember a long time back I got a Scyther-ex (one of the 3 times I bought a booster back since the originals) and thought it was the most horrible thing ever.

 

Personally, I don't feel this is good, and definitely not with the risk as an EX Pokemon. If it wasn't an EX it would be -okay-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Non-legendaries have been given EX status for a long time. I remember a long time back I got a Scyther-ex (one of the 3 times I bought a booster back since the originals) and thought it was the most horrible thing ever.

EX=/=ex

 

My problem with this and the Exadrill EX are that there are still Legendaries without EXs. Arceus, the Regis other than Steel, Suicune (Safeguard one doesn't count because the other 2 were EXs), etc.

Oh yeah, and it isn't even that good. At least It's better than the Exadrill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

EX IS -ex. They both had the same rules tied to them. Are you really going to argue that the hyphen and non capitalization makes a different when mechanically they are the exact same?

Rules have dictated that cards like Suicune (PLB) that affect EX pokemon do not affect ex Pokemon, and vise-Versa.

Plus, they ARE different, as all EX Pokemon are basics, while ex Pokemon are their normal evolutionary state.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

[quote]Since when did non-Legendaries get the EX treatment...[/quote]

 

Usually the first batch of EX's (Primes and Lv X, you know those kind of cards) out are non-Legendaries and people forget about them because they are usually always bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Usually the first batch of EX's (Primes and Lv X, you know those kind of cards) out are non-Legendaries and people forget about them because they are usually always bad.

EX=/=ex

Assuming you're thinking of the ones for the ex-era...

Because no EX pokemon before this and exadrill wasn't legendary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why exactly are EX pokemon almost always bad? is it because the art is usually amazing?

If we're talking about new-EXs, it's because their attack costs are usually strange, overpriced, or they have no ability to compensate.

If we're talking about old-ex, they were usually an insignificant step up from a normal Pokemon, with underwhelming HP and damage typically. They got a lot better about this as they went on, though. The reverse is true for EXs, though...they got worse as time progressed <_<

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we're talking about new-EXs, it's because their attack costs are usually strange, overpriced, or they have no ability to compensate.

If we're talking about old-ex, they were usually an insignificant step up from a normal Pokemon, with underwhelming HP and damage typically. They got a lot better about this as they went on, though. The reverse is true for EXs, though...they got worse as time progressed <_<

There's always 1 or 2 good ones every set, though.

ie Mewtwo, Darkrai, Black Kyurem, KELDEO, Deoxys, Genesect, Virizion...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...