Jump to content

[CF!V] Sins, Sweets and Steel. (Battle Sister OTT)


Recommended Posts

Grade 0 (17)

1 Battle Sister Waffle

4 Psychic Bird (c)

4 Battle Sister, Ginger (c)

4 Battle Sister Chai (H)

4 Battle Sister Tiramasu (D)

 

Grade 1: (14)

4 Battle Sister Chocolat

3 Oracle Guardian Gemini

4 Battle Sister Omelet

3 Battle Sister Coaca

 

Grade 2: (12)

4 Silent Tom

4 Battle Sister Cocotte

4 Battle Sister Macaron

 

Grade 3 (7)

4 Battle Sister, Monaka

3 Battle Sister Cookie.

 

So yeah..

 

I actually really like Monaka as just a plus one that clears out dead weight in my hand. Otherwise, it's just really an Oracle deck, intended to drag out the game, and use Toms for pressure.

 

Grade One line up bothers me, but I need Gemini to run Tom well. And Psychic Bird is because I need the extra pressure, and Stands don't give me that.

 

I don't hugely like Cookie, because I don't want to get stuck on a 10k against some decks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you tried using Parfait? It's a nice cookie alternative, and a 11k to boot. If you played cocotte, i think you should not play Tom. mainly since it increases the chance that you just CB'd for nothing. I suggest using the vanilla 10k and a mixture of lemonade or luck bird(as a one off). Battle sisters have no good 7k sadly. I guess that's all for now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Parfait I might test because it's a 14k attacker with a decent enough pressure ability in the circle. (The breakride not being a Sister hurts here)

 

The issue is: If I don't run Tom, I just don't have a way to actually put pressure on my opponent, because I don't make explosive collums, and rarely demand more than 10k shield for my collums. Tom gets around that hugely, and I'd never risk dropping him.

 

I am however tempted to drop Cocotte and just swap it for the 10k, because it still makes a 16k collum with Coaca, and 18k with Gemini.

 

Thoughts on that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...