Zazubat Posted July 16, 2013 Report Share Posted July 16, 2013 1. Normal Leaderboard Rules apply 2. First to 3 or when the contest ends (July 23rd) wins. 3. Writtens are allowed. 4. Votes must be valid 5. Winners gets a point in the Leaderboard. 6. Voters gets likes if I (or my opponent) like the review enough for it to be worth it. 7. Send by PM because of A/B system. 8. The goal is to make an Xyz Monster. Card A 2 Level 4 monsters If this Attack Position monster would be destroyed by battle, you can have it lose 1000 ATK instead. If this card battles: You can detach 1 Xyz Material from this card; that monster loses 700 ATK and it is banished during your opponent's next End Phase, and if it is, inflict damage to your opponent equal to its ATK. Card B 2 Level 5 DARK and/or LIGHT monsters This card is also treated as LIGHT-Attribute while in the Extra Deck and on the field while you control a monster owned by your opponent. When this card is Xyz Summoned: You can target 1 monster you control and 1 monster your opponnet controls; switch control of those target. Those targets cannot attack or activate their effects. This card cannot be destroyed by battle or by your opponnet's card effects while you control a monster owned by your opponent. Once per turn, during either player's turn: You can Tribute 1 monster your opponent owned; negate and destroy any card effects that target this card until the End Phase, and if you do, this card gains 500 ATK and DEF until the then of your next turn. When this card destroys a monster your originally owned by battle: You can inflict 1000 damage to your opponnet. Other monsters you control cannot attack during the turn you activet this effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aix Posted July 16, 2013 Report Share Posted July 16, 2013 Me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
вєgσттєη ιηѕαηιту Posted July 16, 2013 Report Share Posted July 16, 2013 Dibbs! Ninja'd by a second... -.- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zazubat Posted July 16, 2013 Author Report Share Posted July 16, 2013 Aix was faster, maybe another time Soul! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aix Posted July 16, 2013 Report Share Posted July 16, 2013 Dibbs! Ninja'd by a second... -.- Correction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zazubat Posted July 16, 2013 Author Report Share Posted July 16, 2013 Both are up. I used YuGiCo for this one, since Aix did, and if I didn't you would be able to know. But then again, if you really wanted to, you COULD just look up our profile, and view the card. Unless Aix set it to private that is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zazubat Posted July 18, 2013 Author Report Share Posted July 18, 2013 So, eh, anybody, anybody at all? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northern Sage Posted July 18, 2013 Report Share Posted July 18, 2013 Card A seems to right now only being able to target itself for the second effect, but the effects seem slow and confusing. Meanwhile, Card B's interesting effect coupled with decent stats just gets the vote for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zazubat Posted July 18, 2013 Author Report Share Posted July 18, 2013 Card A seems to right now only being able to target itself for the second effect, but the effects seem slow and confusing.Meanwhile, Card B's interesting effect coupled with decent stats just gets the vote for me.Not the most comprehensive review in the world, I'll wait and see if Aix accepts this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aix Posted July 18, 2013 Report Share Posted July 18, 2013 Card A seems to right now only being able to target itself for the second effect, but the effects seem slow and confusing. Meanwhile, Card B's interesting effect coupled with decent stats just gets the vote for me. That monster implies the monster that it is battling. If it were targeting itself, it'd be "this card" or "this monster". Correct OCG would be "this card", I think. You still going with Card B? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northern Sage Posted July 18, 2013 Report Share Posted July 18, 2013 That monster implies the monster that it is battling. If it were targeting itself, it'd be "this card" or "this monster". Correct OCG would be "this card", I think. You still going with Card B? Yes. Yes, I am. Is the vote acceptable? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zazubat Posted July 18, 2013 Author Report Share Posted July 18, 2013 Yes. Yes, I am. Is the vote acceptable? 0 to A 1 to B Unless Aix has any objections. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aix Posted July 18, 2013 Report Share Posted July 18, 2013 Yeah. The vote's fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darthakin Posted July 18, 2013 Report Share Posted July 18, 2013 I'll be going for A for three reasons. First of all, The second card is awfully confusing for me. It might have to do with dyslexia, but still. 2. your ocg is a bit off. Though I am not 100% sure that's a must. 3. It's effect; or as I get it; would require a lot of control switchers, which might cause more problems then card A. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zazubat Posted July 19, 2013 Author Report Share Posted July 19, 2013 1 to A 1 to B Thanks for voting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.codex Posted July 20, 2013 Report Share Posted July 20, 2013 Card A is powerful as heck, it cannot die by battle, and has an effect that makes what it battle lose a ton of ATK, plus it banishes it even if it doesn't kill it, and it's generic Rank 4, plus extra burn. Card B is way more balanced than other steals will ever be. It's harder to get out, but can still be done by plenty of decks, it does interesting things, can become fairly powerful, but still requires some set-up, which the other doens't, you use use it and win battles. Card B gets my vote for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Therrion Posted July 20, 2013 Report Share Posted July 20, 2013 Card A Gets battle immunity (twice, and while you'll lose a decent amount of Life Points, your opponent loses a minimum of 3 monsters to a banish and burn effect), burns a good amount while doing it AND the kill is not a destroy, but a banish. I feel as though that is too much. Zombie Rabbits ftw. Card B A really interesting card. Not to say that is really any justification as to why I vote for or against it, but it had to be said. I like the kind of game it promotes, a very interactive game between the players and isn't downright unfair in what it generates. While I would usually go against things that promote control switching, however, I feel as though this is a perfectly acceptable card (especially since Card A pressed the self destruct button for me). Vote is for Card B. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aix Posted July 22, 2013 Report Share Posted July 22, 2013 Card A Gets battle immunity (twice, and while you'll lose a decent amount of Life Points, your opponent loses a minimum of 3 monsters to a banish and burn effect), burns a good amount while doing it AND the kill is not a destroy, but a banish. I feel as though that is too much. Zombie Rabbits ftw. Card B A really interesting card. Not to say that is really any justification as to why I vote for or against it, but it had to be said. I like the kind of game it promotes, a very interactive game between the players and isn't downright unfair in what it generates. While I would usually go against things that promote control switching, however, I feel as though this is a perfectly acceptable card (especially since Card A pressed the self destruct button for me). Vote is for Card B. You forget that he only has 2 Xyz Material and you would be silly to not destroy it by a card effect if you can. Anyway Zazu wins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.