Stan Alda Posted June 5, 2013 Report Share Posted June 5, 2013 Why does this card exist again? It's useless in casual (3 Dragons for 2400 ATK isn't good), it's a free bye in tourneys ASSUMING you get the killing blow with it...I'm just scratching my head on this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Not-so-Radiant Arin Posted June 5, 2013 Report Share Posted June 5, 2013 The only logical explanation is that Konami ran out of weed, so they resorted to PCP instead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vla1ne Posted June 5, 2013 Report Share Posted June 5, 2013 This card will remain banned forever. but for some reason( for the lulz ), I would like to see it get set to 1 for a single format. I just want to know how many people would be cheap enough to actually try running a card this badly designed if they could get away with it.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Murphy ☆ Posted June 6, 2013 Report Share Posted June 6, 2013 This card will remain banned forever. but for some reason( for the lulz ), I would like to see it get set to 1 for a single format. I just want to know how many people would be cheap enough to actually try running a card this badly designed if they could get away with it.. What is your reasoning as to why it should stay banned? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sora1499 Posted June 6, 2013 Report Share Posted June 6, 2013 What is your reasoning as to why it should stay banned? Why should the other two games in a match be decided on the events of game one alone? Why should an entire game simply be dismissed as if it didn't matter, based off of the events of an unrelated duel that would have played a very different course than it? It's almost be like if VD said "If you win one game with this card, you automatically win the next 2." The other player would feel cheated, and rightfully so. It shits on P2P interaction by preventing ENTIRE GAMES from occurring in the first place, not even giving the other player a chance to draw 5, let alone draw a shitty 5. So it should stay banned forever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Suibon Posted June 9, 2013 Report Share Posted June 9, 2013 What good is brought back to us by having a match winner even the slightest bit playable? I mean, if Victory Dragon and all its once-in-a-blue-moon match-winning had the slightest redeeming factor that doesn't completely shit then giggle on the concept of the match -- that makes it useful outside of match winning -- I'd be all for bringing it back to the land of the living. Think about it: either way we turn for rulings clarification, we either have a profoundly stupidly designed card that might just make itself available as an end-game boss in this fucked-up shitty meta -- or else a profoundly stupidly designed card that will never see play beyond the casual level because the rulings make it a vanilla in hell -- either way nothing positive is gained. Why bring that back? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sora1499 Posted June 9, 2013 Report Share Posted June 9, 2013 [quote name="Suibon" post="6217811" timestamp="1370744475"][center]What good is brought back to us by having a match winner even the slightest bit playable? I mean, if Victory Dragon and all its once-in-a-blue-moon match-winning had the slightest redeeming factor that doesn't completely shit then giggle on the concept of the match -- that makes it useful outside of match winning -- I'd be all for bringing it back to the land of the living.[/center] [center] [/center] [center]Think about it: either way we turn for rulings clarification, we either have a card that's profoundly stupidly designed card that might just make itself available as an end-game boss in this fucked-up shitty meta -- or else a profoundly stupidly designed card that will never see play beyond the casual level because the rulings make it a vanilla in hell -- either way nothing positive is gained.[/center] [center] [/center] [center]Why bring [i]that[/i] back?[/center][/quote] I am impressed, Suibon. You have done well, you have done well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.