Jump to content

Card of Safe Return


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Crab' date=' you must be aware that Valley is not used only in Magical Explosion FTK.

[/quote']

 

That's precisely why it's staying and Explosion is leaving. Explosion is only useful in its own little deck; Valley can be used elsewhere for less broken purposes.

 

DAD decks also used them.

 

In a good format' date=' there would be no DAD decks to use them.

 

If DAD is banned, FTK will take over, and if Valley is banned, then the game will be fair.

 

Prove that banning DAD, Explosion, and Dimension Fusion will not solve the problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand how Sillva or Goldd needs CoSR' date=' it won't do anything.

[/quote']

 

Erm, believe me, they need it, in my experience in playing an Dark World Deck, you run out of an hand pretty fast and CoSR helps you get some cards

 

Well, IMO it should be Semi-Limited

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol they benefit from it, but far from need it.

 

Just because Grandmaster overextends, doesn't necessarily mean he rewards overextending.

 

The WRA effect is great and all, but there's still this cool option that people seem to forget existed, Battle Phase. Sacred Phoenix of Nephthys was limited and it sure as hell wasn't worthy; GM is no different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Prove that banning DAD' date=' Explosion, and Dimension Fusion will not solve the problem.[/quote']

 

I never said that that would solve the problem. we were agreed on that.

 

Just because i didnt say i dont want explosion and Fusion banned, doesnt mean i dont want them banned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Magical Explosion does not deserve to be killed for one reason. It's easy to counter. In fact' date=' you can win the game with your opponent's own Magical Explosion if you're not stupid and side deck correctly.

[/quote']

 

wait what, Magical Explosion? We are talking about Card of Safe Return here Slayer

 

And, yeah, I have changed my mind, CoSR should be banned

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it makes Certain Decks Viable then why ban it? To be honest i still haven't recovered from the Fact Monster Reborn is Legal again. I've never used COSR myself and it definatly isn't Ban-Worthy.

 

And besides COSR can easily be MST'd Dust Tornadoed or even Twistered!

 

 

That's exactly my argument. However' date=' Crab Helmet's problem with the card is certainly valid. He just has different priorities.

[/quote']

 

CoTH was a trade for giving us Monster Reborn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^A good trade, CoTH < MR

 

( Note the the above poster: Can you please crop out some parts of your Sig, or just Resize it a little, it is streching the screen )

 

Because you started to understand that this card can give you an unlimited amount of + right.

 

This card will just keep getting better by the release of boosters. Once people notice the unlimited advantage, they will run it, alot more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if you are soo good at the game why are you complaining about 1 card that really only works well with 1 deck that n00bs wouldnt think about using anyway

 

heavy storm ok there is one gone, mst second one gone you have onle to worry about chances are he wont even get to use it :S

 

i really do not see what you are complaining about

 

lol protector of the sanctuary XD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand how Sillva or Goldd needs CoSR' date=' it won't do anything.

[/quote']

 

Erm, believe me, they need it, in my experience in playing an Dark World Deck, you run out of an hand pretty fast and CoSR helps you get some cards

 

Srsly?

 

 

[Re: Goldd' date= Wu-Lord of Dark World] If "Goldd, Wu-Lord of Dark World" is discarded by your opponent's card effect, when his effect resolves, he is Special Summoned first, and then the second part of his effect resolves. So the opponent cannot activate "Bottomless Trap Hole" or "Torrential Tribute"; the timing is no longer correct. Also, you could not draw a card for the effect of "Card of Safe Return".

 

[Re: Sillva, Warlord of Dark World] If "Sillva, Warlord of Dark World" is discarded by your opponent's card effect, when his effect resolves, he is Special Summoned first, and then the second part of his effect resolves. So the opponent cannot activate "Bottomless Trap Hole" or "Torrential Tribute"; the timing is no longer correct. Also, you could not draw a card for the effect of "Card of Safe Return".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...