Zazubat Posted April 9, 2013 Report Share Posted April 9, 2013 Based of the ridiculousness of the Ace Attorney and how there's countless "objections" everywhere, even when it doesn't make sense. This game is simple. Object to the previous statement, even if your objection is just as outlandish as the previous. Admins are judges and can say "guilty" or "not guilty" at any point, and then create a new "trail". Trail: Man was drowned in a fishtank. Currently, only 1 witness. The supposed drowner was a man in a clown-suit. Begin: Objection! The fish tank was clearly never filled with water! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alpakha Posted April 9, 2013 Report Share Posted April 9, 2013 OBJECTION!!!! Those fish are still alive, therefore it was indeed filled with WATER! inb4sora'srapecharges Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zazubat Posted April 9, 2013 Author Report Share Posted April 9, 2013 OBJECTION!!!! Those fish are still alive, therefore it was indeed filled with WATER! inb4sora'srapecharges Objection! Those fish are made of plastic! Therefor, they were never even alive! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~British Soul~ Posted April 9, 2013 Report Share Posted April 9, 2013 OBJECTION!! The fish were alive, I saw one of them swim into the drowned man's mouth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UrbanStruggle Posted April 9, 2013 Report Share Posted April 9, 2013 Objection: the body move due to the unicycle that he was riding on and that's why the fish is in his mouth! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reinforce Posted April 9, 2013 Report Share Posted April 9, 2013 Objection: The man and his unicycle are over the other side of the room to the fish tank, and have been there all day, he could not have got a fish in his mouth from that distance away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~British Soul~ Posted April 9, 2013 Report Share Posted April 9, 2013 OBJECTION! The man drowned in the fish tank so there ws no way he could've been on the other side of the room. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UrbanStruggle Posted April 9, 2013 Report Share Posted April 9, 2013 Objection: he was preforming a magic trick using rope/string to make it look like he was levitating across the room! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~British Soul~ Posted April 9, 2013 Report Share Posted April 9, 2013 OBJECTION! He wasn't performing a magic trick, his unicycle hit a rope that was strewn across the floor and that's how he ended up in the fish tank. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alpakha Posted April 9, 2013 Report Share Posted April 9, 2013 OBJECTION! There WAS no fish tank. It was only a false testimony provided by the prosecution! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zazubat Posted April 9, 2013 Author Report Share Posted April 9, 2013 Objection! The autopsy report states that the victim died doing to loss of breath. Explain this! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Resident Fascist Posted April 9, 2013 Report Share Posted April 9, 2013 The victim was found dead hanging from a Telephone Pole, explain that! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zazubat Posted April 9, 2013 Author Report Share Posted April 9, 2013 The victim was found dead hanging from a Telephone Pole, explain that! Objection. You're clearly lying as the autopsy report states so otherwise "The victim died from loss of breath. No further acts of violence occurred". Clearly, the defense doesn't know how to read *laughter* Also gonna use that at the top of the thread if you don't mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Resident Fascist Posted April 9, 2013 Report Share Posted April 9, 2013 Objection. You're clearly lying as the autopsy report states so otherwise "The victim died from loss of breath. No further acts of violence occurred". Clearly, the defense doesn't know how to read *laughter* He was clearly drowned and placed on the Telephone pole! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zazubat Posted April 9, 2013 Author Report Share Posted April 9, 2013 He was clearly drowned and placed on the Telephone pole! Objection! Do you have proof? After all, we have a witness! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Resident Fascist Posted April 9, 2013 Report Share Posted April 9, 2013 Objection! Do you have proof? After all, we have a witness! He was in the TV! ... Did the victim by any chance, dislike water, or have a occupation related to it...? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~British Soul~ Posted April 9, 2013 Report Share Posted April 9, 2013 It was the witness who murdered the victim. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zazubat Posted April 9, 2013 Author Report Share Posted April 9, 2013 It was the witness who murdered the victim. Objection! No proof! I demand proof! I want the witness up on the stand now! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~British Soul~ Posted April 9, 2013 Report Share Posted April 9, 2013 Objection! No proof! I demand proof! I want the witness up on the stand now! Your honour, the witness has provided us with this statement. "The man that was found in the room dead was strangled with a telephone line and drowned him in the fish tank before exiting the room through the window. I watched from the closet until the police arrived otherwise I'd be in the frame." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zazubat Posted April 9, 2013 Author Report Share Posted April 9, 2013 Your honour, the witness has provided us with this statement. "The man that was found in the room dead was strangled with a telephone line and drowned him in the fish tank before exiting the room through the window. I watched from the closet until the police arrived otherwise I'd be in the frame." Objection! I am not the honour as far as I know, I'm just a simple prosecutor. Regardless, can the witness prove he was in the closet at this time? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~British Soul~ Posted April 9, 2013 Report Share Posted April 9, 2013 Objection! I am not the honour as far as I know, I'm just a simple prosecutor. Regardless, can the witness prove he was in the closet at this time? There is a judge in the room. Also I would like to bring up the photo that the witness provided from inside his closet. *Witness in closet.jpeg* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alpakha Posted April 12, 2013 Report Share Posted April 12, 2013 OBJECTION! T'was NOT a closet but, in fact, A WARDROBE. Also, that witness is mentally insane. He supposedly met a talking lion and became a king while in that wardrobe. He apparently killed an evil witch while in there too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zazubat Posted April 12, 2013 Author Report Share Posted April 12, 2013 OBJECTION! T'was NOT a closet but, in fact, A WARDROBE. Also, that witness is mentally insane. He supposedly met a talking lion and became a king while in that wardrobe. He apparently killed an evil witch while in there too. Obejction! That is obviously the same wardrobe as Narnia's! The witness is perfectly healthy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alpakha Posted April 12, 2013 Report Share Posted April 12, 2013 OBJECTION! Narnia isn't real..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zazubat Posted April 14, 2013 Author Report Share Posted April 14, 2013 Objection! Prove that! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.