Jump to content

DN Chronicles *Remake*


Aix

Recommended Posts

I can't deny that. His deck wasn't even that bad, though it was really straightforward and the only reason why he lasted that long was that I bricked hard at the start. Can't deny that it's still more skillful than Tellarknights...

I really wouldn't have had anything against that guy if he didn't act like a total jerk.

F*ck Sattellarknights. Little to no strategy. This is why one reason I side Light-Imprisoning Mirror in my deck.

 

This is ignorant as sheet. Tellars are a very skill-intensive meta deck, requiring a good pilot to maximize their efficiency. Their design is simple, and somewhat generic, yes, but this does not make them skilless, and it does not mean they have no skill.

 

It is one thing to say a deck is too good, or too consistent, but calling a deck skilless or strategyless when you really have very little meta knowledge is one of the things that bugs me in this thread the most. It is fine if you want to play casually, but pretending that it somehow makes you superior to those who are using actual competitive decks is just delusional.

 

I don't give a funk if you are competitive or not. It has nothing to do with me. But please don't sheet on the competitive environment you don't even know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Puh-leese. It's a Rank 4 spam that has literally 3 plays, one of which is hiding behind backrow they can only run because they have a dedicated solemn warning that lets them draw and because of the stupidity that is the Seraph Engine. Nekroz requires more strategy, and that's a deck based on not letting your opponent play. Hell, QLIPHORT could require more skill now that Saqlifice is at 1 and Scout at 2, because at least Qliphort now are forced to include some ED monsters and some plays that are not "Pendulum, Tribute, pop random stuff, attack for game". Meanwhile, Satellarknights have free plusses, floating bosses and spamming galore. Not to mention that they use the Seraph engine, which is the sackiest thing ever bar Lightsworns. I really can't see how such a thing could be called "skilled".

 

Jfc will you stop complaining already? Go lick the salt of your anooos / go play with the decks that you like and stop jabroniing about what the competitive decks run.

 

xOQWQfQ.png

 

Apparently, Tanng activates after the damage step and I have no idea what the funk the guy said before quitting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Puh-leese. It's a Rank 4 spam that has literally 3 plays, one of which is hiding behind backrow they can only run because they have a dedicated solemn warning that lets them draw and because of the stupidity that is the Seraph Engine. Nekroz requires more strategy, and that's a deck based on not letting your opponent play. Hell, QLIPHORT could require more skill now that Saqlifice is at 1 and Scout at 2, because at least Qliphort now are forced to include some ED monsters and some plays that are not "Pendulum, Tribute, pop random stuff, attack for game". Meanwhile, Satellarknights have free plusses, floating bosses and spamming galore. Not to mention that they use the Seraph engine, which is the sackiest thing ever bar Lightsworns. I really can't see how such a thing could be called "skilled".

 

Actually, most competitive Tellar decks don't use Seraphs, because they prefer a more backrow-oriented playstyle.

 

As for Nekroz being a deck based on not letting your opponent play... um what? If you mean djinn lock, that is literally 1 play in the deck, and hardly its defining feature. Nekroz are based on consistently pulling value off of trishula and valkyrus.

 

As for qliphort requiring more skill because they now have less searchers... How exactly is that the case? By your definition, skill is equal to dependence on luck, which makes literally no sense.

 

Could you define what you mean by "skill" so that it isn't just used as a meaningless hotword?

 

When was the last time you actually used a meta deck?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A few rounds on DN do not a competitive environment make.

 

Anyway, it is clear that your irrational hatred for good decks won't change, so I am not going to to to explain any more.

 

For another topic, what should I play over the weekend to see if I get any decent screenshots?

-Nekrozdolls

-Seraphdolls

-Volcanic

-Qliphort

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you want a competitive environment based on skill, play chess, Giga.

If you don't want a competitive environment based on skill, why were you complaining about the competitive environment being skilless..?

 

Also, about to head out for a weekend of parties, so no need to continue this tail-chasing argument.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jfc will you stop complaining already? Go lick the salt of your anooos / go play with the decks that you like and stop b****ing about what the competitive decks run.

 

xOQWQfQ.png

 

Apparently, Tanng activates after the damage step and I have no idea what the f*** the guy said before quitting.

 

Basically he said "Go F**k yourself, you s****y pig with a double chin"

I like to complain, so what? Also, what that guy said is something very, very rude and you don't want to know what it means, trust me. Honestly, it makes me really sad that so many of my compatriots seem to be part of that obnoxious, rude and childish part of the DN population...

YOU're ITALIAN TOO????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yo qliphort DEFINITELY take more skill than tellarknights.

 

But for real, please remember that you actually have an opponent to play against so all these awesome perfect "summon deneb, make rank 4" scenarios are not going to happen most of the time. You need to make decisions when to use your cards to make sure you're able to push your cards through while stopping your opponent just beating you (Alpha is the card responsible for most of these different plays), as well as digging deep into games where you can't instantly access Deneb. Just because a deck is consistently beating mediocre decks that aren't as good at punishing misplays doesn't mean it's not skilless to play when you're playing actual good decks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the main problem I have with tellarknights, along with a few other decks (though mainly tellars) isn't anything to do with the skill level required to play but the fact they are so unimaginative. They are just yet another rank 4 spam deck, and they lack any sort of gimmick or feature to make them interesting. They are basically a clone of Constellars.

 

In any game with multiple choices it requires skill to play, unless the other options are so blatantly obviously bad that you would never do it except for a joke.

 

Anyway this is deviating from the purpose of this thread so I don't think any more should be said about skill etc here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the main problem I have with tellarknights, along with a few other decks (though mainly tellars) isn't anything to do with the skill level required to play but the fact they are so unimaginative. They are just yet another rank 4 spam deck, and they lack any sort of gimmick or feature to make them interesting. They are basically a clone of Constellars.

 

In any game with multiple choices it requires skill to play, unless the other options are so blatantly obviously bad that you would never do it except for a joke.

 

Anyway this is deviating from the purpose of this thread so I don't think any more should be said about skill etc here.

Well, some of their cards do list "tellar" instead of the whole archetype name, similar to "lswarm". Skill aside, one thing you forgot to mention is the "tellar" Xyz that'd allow you to Summon Cyber Dragon Nova and of course, Cyber Dragon Infinity.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...