Sora1499 Posted December 12, 2013 Report Share Posted December 12, 2013 Before I accepted that guy's duel, I got a PM from this other guy named zaulin: [spoiler=Episode 7 - I'm 12 and what is this] zaulin: how so? As a response to "DN's playerbase is awful" Paperworks: Because everyone is the exact same, and it's disgusting. zaulin: how is everyone the same? zaulin: ... Paperworks: See, it's like this.... zaulin: yes? Paperworks: Everyone on here, literally, does nothing but rely on luck the entire time, and claim it as being skill. Paperworks: But it's not, and never will be. zaulin: i see you are not that smart Really? Proven right, upon first post? zaulin: it takes a lot more than luck to build a deck zaulin: and to play it correctly Paperworks: Thank you for proving my point. Im dropping this; Have a nice day. But no, he doesn't ignore me zaulin: and how did i prove your point, may i ask? Paperworks: I just said everyone on here is awful for having an over-dependance on luck, then you proceed to go: "LEL I USE LUCK.DEK" Me 1 - Him 0 Paperworks: :/ zaulin: i didn't ... Paperworks: No, you did. zaulin: i said, it takes a lot MORE than luck Paperworks: No, luck should NEVER be the deciding factor. Everyone on here insists on making it that. Paperworks: Why? Because they are awful. zaulin: then why are you here? Friends are more important then card games. zaulin: it is a card game zaulin: all card games require luck to play I'm not saying I use luck to play card games, but when I do, I use luck to play card games Paperworks: Because Im not one of the assholes who plays this game just to sack wins, and actually bothers to play it for waht it is. Says the jackass who plays Geargias every other game zaulin: which is? Paperworks: Yugioh has an overabundance of cards/methods/etc that remove the luck factor from the game all together. Your terrible if you still insist on using just that, and nothing else. zaulin: if you don't like luck, just go play chess zaulin: and btw zaulin: how do you get rid of the luck of the draw? zaulin: or your first hand? Paperworks: No, because if the game doesn't have a critical dependance on luck, then it becomes more of a game of wits, and actually proves people know how to play their cards. Paperworks: Not "LEL I WIN CUZ I OPEN 3X WARNING" zaulin: this game wasn't meant to be a game of wits Me 2 - Him 0 zaulin: there are plenty of games of wits out ther zaulin: *there Paperworks: Riiiight. Then Bujins wouldn't exist. Then Evilswarm wouldn't exist. Then Constellars wouldn't exist. Paperworks: OWAIT. I might be exaggerating, when I mentioned those decks, but you get the idea zaulin: if you don't like it, leave. Paperworks: Why? It wont improve anything, and DN will just continue to remain in its awful state. >Implying that Arm being on DN fixes anything zaulin: face it, NO ONE THINKS LIKE YOU!! I'M TOO MUCH OF A HIPSTER FOR THIS GAME. CONGRATULATIONS FOR FIGURING THIS OUT zaulin: no one want anything improved zaulin: *wants Paperworks: Exactly. It's why everyone on here is so awful. zaulin: and no one want the game to change zaulin: *wants zaulin: and why do you care? Paperworks: DevPro isn't luck-dependant. Duel Monsters Genesis isn't luck dependant. DMG, actually kinda' sorta' is, but they at least justify it So why is it only DN that's so awful? zaulin: DN is only a portal to the game, it only is exactly like the real thing Me 3 - Him 0 zaulin: so how is it awful? Paperworks: No, it's not the same. zaulin: how is it not? zaulin: tell me Paperworks: I literally just said, that Dev/DMG dont have playerbases that can't do shit unless they rely on luck., zaulin: HOW DOES IT RELY ON LUCK??!!! Paperworks: Tell me, Zaulin, what deck do you play? zaulin: several Paperworks: Whats your main deck then. zaulin: E-heroes Paperworks: What kind? Alius.dek or... ? zaulin: no neos zaulin: just normal heroes without neos Paperworks: So... Spacians and the whole nine yards? zaulin: no zaulin: just heroes zaulin: and some other suppoert cards Paperworks: So Avian/Burst/etc? zaulin: yup My sides. zaulin: and some hex-sealed Paperworks: Thank you for proving my point, once again. Me 4 - Him 0 zaulin: which is? zaulin: once again? zaulin: well? Paperworks: You don't understand the game on this level because you literally are one of the many people who DO show a lack of decency BECAUSE of your luck dependancy. Paperworks: So no wonder you got all defensive because you do just that; Sack wins and show no real effort zaulin: i have no idea why you're even doing this -_- Paperworks: BUT YOU STARTED IT BY ASKING ME zaulin: i mean even posting it on a duel note zaulin: just, why? Paperworks: In fact, it was hardly even a question. It was just someone's opinion of DN. zaulin: it is litterally imposible to have a cards game that doesn't rely on luck zaulin: *card Paperworks: Gishkis dont rely on luck, because they can pick and choose their cards at will. Paperworks: Gustos are a wlking toolbox that can, again, pick and choose their cards at will. Paperworks: DURRR STILL RELY ON LUCK Spellbooks can toolbox like crazy. Or rather, used to. Paperworks: Your logic is so bad. Just stop. zaulin: durrr? zaulin: what is durrr? Paperworks: Let me guess, your HEROs deck play 1 Winged Kuriboh, 1 Necroshade, and then you play Black Luster, right? zaulin: i don't have a kuriboh zaulin: or black luster soldier zaulin: and i have 2 necroshades zaulin: which i never even summon Me 5 - Him 0 Paperworks: Have you ever played against Dragon Rulers? zaulin: many times Paperworks: Do you notice how they can do the same thing every time? zaulin: yes Paperworks: Answer: Because they all search eachother. This removes the luck factor. To an extent zaulin: so you're asking everyone to use dragonrulers or gishkis? Paperworks: No. zaulin: or gustos? Paperworks: Im saying, that there are decks that dont use luck as a sole dependancy. zaulin: then what? zaulin: so? zaulin: people have a right to pick what they want? Me 5 - Him 1; It took you that long? Really? Paperworks: But you play 60-card-highlander-HEROs, and think the logic of that idiocy is what determines the whole game. Paperworks: YEP. GOOMBAS WERE IN THE FIRST MARIO; MAIN VILLIAN OF EVERYTHING /JonTron zaulin: 40 card -_- Paperworks: FUCK BOWSER. GOOMBAS ARE TRUE FINAL BOSS zaulin: and no highlander Paperworks: Tell you what, I'll give you 1 last chance: Screenshot your HERO.dek, and let me see it. zaulin: ok zaulin: hold on zaulin: zaulin: what do you want people to do anyway? zaulin: or konami? Paperworks: You play Destruct Potion... Why? zaulin: if someone uses, say lightning vortex zaulin: i can gain LP instead of just losing a monster Paperworks: You play only 2 E Call and no Reinforcement, why? zaulin: because it works 11/10 Paperworks: You plays Swords of Light, why? zaulin: so i can stall while i build up my hand People use Typhoons like water. Just sayin' Paperworks: In fact, why the fuck do you play Black Horn of Heaven? You know it ONLY works on Synchros/Xyzs, right? zaulin: yes Paperworks: In fact, why the fucking shit do you play Necroshade in the first place? And don't save its because Blade because Blade is terrible. zaulin: necroid shaman zaulin: and darkbright Paperworks: Both of those suck, as well. Darkbright was cooler back in 2008 zaulin: and fyi, they have won duels zaulin: so has blade Paperworks: Also you should at least play Absolute Zero in 3s, given the fact you play 2 Miracles, 1 Paralell, and at least 4 WATERs. zaulin: i have finetune this deck for a while and like it this way -_- Sticking with the luck motif, huh? zaulin: *fintuned Paperworks: Also Re-Fusion, literally, has absolutely no targets in the deck. zaulin: *finetuned zaulin: i know that Paperworks: Then why do you play it? zaulin: because i like to You play a card, just for the sake of it always being dead? DN/10 Paperworks: But its a 100% dead card in this deck. zaulin: and arent we off topic? Paperworks: I gave you one job; Give me your deck and prove you have some decency. Nope. Couldn't do that. Paperworks: Strike 3, your out. Paperworks: Game. Set. Match. zaulin: may i say something? Paperworks: Thank you, have a nice day. zaulin: it's just a game Paperworks: Then play Prisons over your 2 Cylinders. zaulin: i will do what i want Paperworks: Also if you said you enjoy the casual aspect of it, then why didn't you? You insisted like you knew things that you didn't. zaulin: and i do Paperworks: Really, not all of us play the game seriously. Why did you take the idiot approach and try to act like you were hot shit? zaulin: do you enjoy talking like that to twelve year olds? This far into the conversation and you admit this? Paperworks: I didn't know you were twelve either. Why do you people never be honest? zaulin: and are you really like that in really like that in the reall world? Paperworks: Really, if you said "Im 12 and play a Jaden.dek" from the beginning, all of this would be avoided. Fact. zaulin: and how was i dishonest? zaulin: and it is not a "jaden deck" Necro Shaman. Bladedge. Random stuff that doesn't make sense. Seems like Jaden to me. Paperworks: No, I mean, you acted like you knew this game the whole way through. You didn't. Simple as that. Paperworks: Your HERO.dek can be a lot more effecient. Honestly, it can. Why do you hold it back? zaulin: as you said, it is a game Paperworks: And I never once said that. zaulin: No, I mean, you acted like you knew this game zaulin: you did Paperworks: Because I know it, and you don't. zaulin: and why does any of this matter again? zaulin: just enjoy the game zaulin: and if you don't like it, tell konami Paperworks: Tell you what... Play 3 Prismas, 3 E-Call, Reinforcement, 3 King of the Swamp, and then play Poly and Miracle in 3s as well. Paperworks: Then just add monsters that make your other HERO Fusions. Paperworks: ????? Paperworks: Profitzaulin has logged out ...I have no comment.[/spoiler] DN's playerbase is atrocious. That's why I only play with YCM peeps. /pretentious as fuck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted December 12, 2013 Report Share Posted December 12, 2013 This guy just wasted 2 Mirror Forces on my Ark Knight.How!?Just... How!?Ark Knight, of all monsters, and your literally going to that extreme to remove it? And your playing Mecha Phantoms?...Just how the fuck does that even work!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted December 13, 2013 Report Share Posted December 13, 2013 People who say they are testing stuff, I swear, make for the best opponents:Assuming his hand is full of Faders, and the fact he knew full well I was playing this sort of deck(He E-Con'd my first Sigma)... Why the hell would you leave a Swap Frog on the field!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Noel- Posted December 13, 2013 Report Share Posted December 13, 2013 lmao, didnt play on DN for a while, and for my return, i got very appropriate opponent for a deck i just made for fun, take a look Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted December 13, 2013 Report Share Posted December 13, 2013 Gishkis Hieratics- Your Opponent is trying too hard.Either way, pretty silly how he fulfilled 3/4 of Sophia's requirements. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Noel- Posted December 13, 2013 Report Share Posted December 13, 2013 well, the big mistake of him is not stop ss after i discard maxx c for his tefnuit, and that give me about 7 cards XD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted December 14, 2013 Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 [spoiler=Episode 9 - Welcome to Hell]Paperworks: mis-clicked with that draw.Paperworks: Hamster's effectPaperworks: Tantan's effectPaperworks: Currant's effectfaabdata: doesn't say face downfaabdata: so the card targeted has to be face upPaperworks: Doesn't matter.faabdata: yes it does matterPaperworks: If it said it only hits face-ups, then it would say that.Paperworks: So your logic is invalidPaperworks: Destroy that monster, pleasefaabdata: no my logic is not invalid, there are cards that specifly say "FACE DOWN"Paperworks: And there are cards that also specify if they pick Face-ups.faabdata: and there are cards that say no mater the postionPaperworks: Currant is neither of thosefaabdata: position*Paperworks: Currant targets any 1 card. Doesn't matter what position.faabdata: it doesn't say any postion on itPaperworks: http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Card_Rulings:Currantosa,_Mystical_Beast_of_the_Forestfaabdata: so it can only target a face upPaperworks: nope.Paperworks: It cant, because it doesn't say any position on itfaabdata: read the rulebookPaperworks: I didfaabdata: doubt itPaperworks: Then go on, find me proof that Currant can't hit Face-down monsters.faabdata: I don't mean the rulingfaabdata: read rulebookfaabdata: it says specifly on therePaperworks: Which page?Paperworks: Also your being very immature over this.Paperworks: It's simple. Currant targets any 1 card. Doesn't matter what position it is, because that is still /1 card on the field/.faabdata: LOL, I am being immature? how long have u been playing 4?faabdata: 6 months?Paperworks: Time spent playing doesn't matter.Paperworks: The irony is that you can't read.faabdata: yes it does matter when you say things like thatfaabdata: now answer my questionPaperworks: Humor me for a second. K? Here is Tribute to the Doomed: http://static1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20131207102034/yugioh/images/thumb/8/85/TributetoTheDoomed-YSKR-EN-C-1E.png/300px-TributetoTheDoomed-YSKRPaperworks: Doomed Targets monsters, right?Paperworks: Doomed also targets any 1 monster, right?Paperworks: Doomed also doesn't specify, right?Paperworks: Ergo, it doesn't matter.faabdata: well since you fail to answer my question.......... there is no reason to continue this duel. Your typical of DN ppl here only have played for 6 months and think you know all the rulesPaperworks: Again, the irony is that you simply cant read.Paperworks: Tell you what Mr.Ignorant, just add your Exodia Limbs to your hand, and call it a day.faabdata: well look buddy I have got top ranked in ladder and I don't even see your name in the ranking of ladder, so when u can get top ranked too in ladder let me know and come back and tell me all this bullPaperworks: Top ranked in ladder?faabdata: yupPaperworks: Is that why you have 100/0?faabdata: umm, on myleaguePaperworks: Which leage? www.IBeatAllTheKidsAtMySchol.com?faabdata: oo, are we jelious now?faabdata: LOLfaabdata: too bad 4 uPaperworks: Becausre you can beat other 8 year olds?faabdata's die landed on 2Paperworks: Real impressivefaabdata's die landed on 6faabdata's die landed on 2faabdata's die landed on 3faabdata's die landed on 1faabdata's die landed on 1Paperworks: Also, because your now spamming dice, instead of refusing to continue, literally just solidified the fact your the most immature player on DN.faabdata's die landed on 3faabdata's die landed on 4faabdata's die landed on 4faabdata's die landed on 1faabdata's die landed on 2faabdata's die landed on 2faabdata's die landed on 1faabdata's die landed on 6faabdata's die landed on 3Paperworks: You know, you can't go and act all high and mighty, then resort to doing this out of nothing but spite.faabdata's die landed on 1faabdata's die landed on 3Paperworks: Literally all thios does is make you look bad, and just proves howterrible you are.faabdata's die landed on 2faabdata's die landed on 4faabdata's die landed on 1faabdata's die landed on 2faabdata's die landed on 4faabdata's die landed on 3Paperworks: Really, if you wanted to actually duel, you would have said so.faabdata's die landed on 3faabdata's die landed on 6faabdata's die landed on 2faabdata's die landed on 4faabdata's die landed on 4faabdata's die landed on 5faabdata's die landed on 3faabdata's die landed on 6faabdata's die landed on 3faabdata's die landed on 5faabdata's die landed on 5Paperworks: Also the irony is that, you go on and claim that I'm terrible, then proceed to spam like this.faabdata's die landed on 4Paperworks: The hypocracy is adorablefaabdata's die landed on 3faabdata's die landed on 4faabdata's die landed on 3faabdata's die landed on 1faabdata's die landed on 4faabdata's die landed on 4faabdata's die landed on 3faabdata's die landed on 3faabdata's die landed on 4Paperworks: Times like this, I wish people on DN weren;t so awful.[/spoiler]He said no Synchros n' junk.I played Currant.dekDidn't provide a screenshot. This guy wasn't worth it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Βyakuya Posted December 14, 2013 Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 [spoiler=Episode 8 - Welcome to Hell] Paperworks: mis-clicked with that draw. Paperworks: Hamster's effect Paperworks: Tantan's effect Paperworks: Currant's effect faabdata: doesn't say face down faabdata: so the card targeted has to be face up Paperworks: Doesn't matter. faabdata: yes it does matter Paperworks: If it said it only hits face-ups, then it would say that. Paperworks: So your logic is invalid Paperworks: Destroy that monster, please faabdata: no my logic is not invalid, there are cards that specifly say "FACE DOWN" Paperworks: And there are cards that also specify if they pick Face-ups. faabdata: and there are cards that say no mater the postion Paperworks: Currant is neither of those faabdata: position* Paperworks: Currant targets any 1 card. Doesn't matter what position. faabdata: it doesn't say any postion on it Paperworks: http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Card_Rulings:Currantosa,_Mystical_Beast_of_the_Forest faabdata: so it can only target a face up Paperworks: nope. Paperworks: It cant, because it doesn't say any position on it faabdata: read the rulebook Paperworks: I did faabdata: doubt it Paperworks: Then go on, find me proof that Currant can't hit Face-down monsters. faabdata: I don't mean the ruling faabdata: read rulebook faabdata: it says specifly on there Paperworks: Which page? Paperworks: Also your being very immature over this. Paperworks: It's simple. Currant targets any 1 card. Doesn't matter what position it is, because that is still /1 card on the field/. faabdata: LOL, I am being immature? how long have u been playing 4? faabdata: 6 months? Paperworks: Time spent playing doesn't matter. Paperworks: The irony is that you can't read. faabdata: yes it does matter when you say things like that faabdata: now answer my question Paperworks: Humor me for a second. K? Here is Tribute to the Doomed: http://static1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20131207102034/yugioh/images/thumb/8/85/TributetoTheDoomed-YSKR-EN-C-1E.png/300px-TributetoTheDoomed-YSKR Paperworks: Doomed Targets monsters, right? Paperworks: Doomed also targets any 1 monster, right? Paperworks: Doomed also doesn't specify, right? Paperworks: Ergo, it doesn't matter. faabdata: well since you fail to answer my question.......... there is no reason to continue this duel. Your typical of DN ppl here only have played for 6 months and think you know all the rules Paperworks: Again, the irony is that you simply cant read. Paperworks: Tell you what Mr.Ignorant, just add your Exodia Limbs to your hand, and call it a day. faabdata: well look buddy I have got top ranked in ladder and I don't even see your name in the ranking of ladder, so when u can get top ranked too in ladder let me know and come back and tell me all this bull Paperworks: Top ranked in ladder? faabdata: yup Paperworks: Is that why you have 100/0? faabdata: umm, on myleague Paperworks: Which leage? www.IBeatAllTheKidsAtMySchol.com? faabdata: oo, are we jelious now? faabdata: LOL faabdata: too bad 4 u Paperworks: Becausre you can beat other 8 year olds? faabdata's die landed on 2 Paperworks: Real impressive faabdata's die landed on 6 faabdata's die landed on 2 faabdata's die landed on 3 faabdata's die landed on 1 faabdata's die landed on 1 Paperworks: Also, because your now spamming dice, instead of refusing to continue, literally just solidified the fact your the most immature player on DN. faabdata's die landed on 3 faabdata's die landed on 4 faabdata's die landed on 4 faabdata's die landed on 1 faabdata's die landed on 2 faabdata's die landed on 2 faabdata's die landed on 1 faabdata's die landed on 6 faabdata's die landed on 3 Paperworks: You know, you can't go and act all high and mighty, then resort to doing this out of nothing but spite. faabdata's die landed on 1 faabdata's die landed on 3 Paperworks: Literally all thios does is make you look bad, and just proves howterrible you are. faabdata's die landed on 2 faabdata's die landed on 4 faabdata's die landed on 1 faabdata's die landed on 2 faabdata's die landed on 4 faabdata's die landed on 3 Paperworks: Really, if you wanted to actually duel, you would have said so. faabdata's die landed on 3 faabdata's die landed on 6 faabdata's die landed on 2 faabdata's die landed on 4 faabdata's die landed on 4 faabdata's die landed on 5 faabdata's die landed on 3 faabdata's die landed on 6 faabdata's die landed on 3 faabdata's die landed on 5 faabdata's die landed on 5 Paperworks: Also the irony is that, you go on and claim that I'm terrible, then proceed to spam like this. faabdata's die landed on 4 Paperworks: The hypocracy is adorable faabdata's die landed on 3 faabdata's die landed on 4 faabdata's die landed on 3 faabdata's die landed on 1 faabdata's die landed on 4 faabdata's die landed on 4 faabdata's die landed on 3 faabdata's die landed on 3 faabdata's die landed on 4 Paperworks: Times like this, I wish people on DN weren;t so awful.[/spoiler] He said no Synchros n' junk. I played Currant.dek Didn't provide a screenshot. This guy wasn't worth it. These kind of people...it's like they use dice like it's garlic against vampires and call the BS alert like ignorant idiots. Apparently trying to establish experience vs. knowing how to place isn't goign to be much of a good defense either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted December 14, 2013 Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 It's funnny, though, he thought that with regards to his note people wouldn't actually destroy stuff, and he could just Set stuff to Tribute for God Cards.No, really, he got all defensive as soon as he got his 3rd Set monster out, so I'm just assuming he was going to do something idiotic with them.Also, because it's full of typos n' junk, is cuz' I was in a hurry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted December 14, 2013 Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 Mind the double post.This guy went on and on how he was some god-tier unbeatable player, and it's been a while since I've used my Fire King deck.So.....I still find it silly how he used Lightning Vortex on Garunix.Although, I do like the fact he used Gigastone Omega as a means of trying to bait me into killing my own backrow, but, you know, I have Call of the Haunted in 3s and just happen to have 1 on my field to revive Garunix ahead of time, and defeat his whole strategy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted December 15, 2013 Report Share Posted December 15, 2013 Found someone who was saying DN is full of top-tier players and otherwise people who only play tier 0 decks, and she also plays a "girl deck". Also it's a Traditional one, btw. Felt like playing against her, to try and relive some of the tension she was having:Personally, I don't blame her. At least I made her feel better by not playing something over-the-top.Said cruel move, was me Typhooing her Set Horn of the Unicorn. Derp.MEANWHILE, ON THE OPPOSITE END OF THE SPECTRUM...This guy was saying "no stupid chain decks"; Felt like dueling him, after I got into a slight 'conversation' with him, since he plays a random of pile of cards that he dubbed a "D.D. Deck":And as always, people don't just upfront say they are playing random stuff on purpose, just to goof around.But no, we have to drag this out all the way until the end:It's funny, though, the whole thing started over me asking why he played this random thing in the purpose.But no, instead of just saying "Its a joke deck that I screw around with", we have to get into a debate over card choices and what-not, on the grounds that hes defend this like it's his actual deck.Just... Why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goddamnit names are a pain Posted December 15, 2013 Report Share Posted December 15, 2013 Because people come to DN with whatever pride they have left from getting their butts kicked IRL and hold on to it like a desperate madman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepy Posted December 15, 2013 Report Share Posted December 15, 2013 It's the risk you take when you make random decks. I've made random decks before, but very rarely do they get even with other people's random decks. And I actually put thought into my builds so it's not all that "random". So it kinda hurts inside a bit when I lose badly to other casual stuff. Then again, I prefer that than having an opponent clearly have better plays but to know they are holding back for the sake of fun. It's like fighting a pointless battle you know you can't win, because if you DO turn it around that turn, they can just stop holding back and release a bit more aggression. It just takes time to lose, which in this case is not all that great. There are people with too much dumb pride in the site though. They can't possibly blame themselves for what happens. It's always the "stupid meta deck" comments when you use any staple even if the deck is something like Mokey Mokey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted December 15, 2013 Report Share Posted December 15, 2013 And I actually put thought into my builds so it's not all that "random".And this, Sleepy is what separates you from the rest. You put effort into your work, and that's all the matters. Why? Because it's the most prominent aspect of it, and will always prove to be better.Anyway... Some guy was playing Gimmick Puppets/Machina/Cyber Dragon-Overload Fusion:He offered to re-match:Basically he was trying to fudge his way into a win, when he knows hes clearly wrong.Also, not that it's any relevance...This guy was saying Rulers will still be the best deck-[spoiler=K. I disagree]Paperworks: Lets see....Paperworks: Each Ruler is@1; They cant search other copies of themselvesPaperworks: Star Sword is@1; Draw engine killedPaperworks: Sarcoph@1; InconsistantPaperworks: Return is at 0; Lost that win conditionMaxx D2: how about this i duel you wih my jan 14 rulersPaperworks: Ravine@0; Deck thinning enging is deadMaxx D2: prove yourself rihtPaperworks: So really, Rulers, as a deck, is dead.Maxx D2: you are wrongPaperworks: Why? Because you play Hieratics or Sacksworns?Maxx D2: noMaxx D2: i play mythic andMaxx D2: blue eyesPaperworks: So then tell me. How do Rulers get copies of themselves into their own hand?Maxx D2 has logged outBlue-Eyes + Mythic Dragons is still Blue-Eyes + Mythic Dragons. It's not, in any way shape or form, Rulers.[/spoiler]And with that, I'm taking a break from this topic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Noel- Posted December 16, 2013 Report Share Posted December 16, 2013 just wonder what's his official site ... P.S. he immediately out when i make a call XD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted December 16, 2013 Report Share Posted December 16, 2013 Wait, what were you calling an admin over? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Dr Professor Spaz Posted December 18, 2013 Report Share Posted December 18, 2013 This one embraced the fact that there was nothing he could do. I searched for him the Online List just to confirm it was a ragequit and not a disconnect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepy Posted December 18, 2013 Report Share Posted December 18, 2013 just wonder what's his official site ... P.S. he immediately out when i make a call XD From the image, let me guess what happened: He went first, Activated clock tower and Fused for Destiny End. Your turn, you set and pass. His turn, he Summons Sparkman and prepares to use Destiny End's eff in your face-down. Destiny End's DN's lore doesn't seem to deem that illegal. Exactly what happened that was worth looking a ruling for? That or Dark Tower missed a chance to get a Counter or something? IDK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
:^) Posted December 19, 2013 Report Share Posted December 19, 2013 2nd Turn Agent Slifer OTK: Opponent was running Exodia Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Noel- Posted December 20, 2013 Report Share Posted December 20, 2013 From the image, let me guess what happened: He went first, Activated clock tower and Fused for Destiny End. Your turn, you set and pass. His turn, he Summons Sparkman and prepares to use Destiny End's eff in your face-down. Destiny End's DN's lore doesn't seem to deem that illegal. Exactly what happened that was worth looking a ruling for? That or Dark Tower missed a chance to get a Counter or something? IDK. no, he just a noob who using Dark-hex sealed Fusion to fusion D-end and not admit that it cant XD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepy Posted December 20, 2013 Report Share Posted December 20, 2013 no, he just a noob who using Dark-hex sealed Fusion to fusion D-end and not admit that it cant XD Oh I see. Normally the Hex-Sealed effect can allow for Special Summon that is not Fusion Summon, but since he went for the Polymerization route, it's illegal to use substitutes. Haha. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Noel- Posted December 20, 2013 Report Share Posted December 20, 2013 yea, but any of those lv 10 seems so hard to bring on the field, at least if i run my own D-end deck, im sure i will not tech any dark-hex XD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
:^) Posted December 21, 2013 Report Share Posted December 21, 2013 i got bored of saying teth. after losing he challenged me to a rematch, then quit after my first turn. he didnt even get a turn [quote] superduelmann69: you didnt even get a turn superduelmann69: i feel so bad HypnoHawk: lol it's cool HypnoHawk: Nice deck idea[/quote] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goddamnit names are a pain Posted December 21, 2013 Report Share Posted December 21, 2013 I love the way your deck looks. Tethys FTW. And noobsbehatin, but meh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
:^) Posted December 21, 2013 Report Share Posted December 21, 2013 I love the way your deck looks. Tethys FTW. And noobsbehatin, but meh. Tethys too stronk. This was my 1st turn, after he had just gone. [spoiler=Deck Profile] 24 Monsters 3x Mystical Shine Ball 2x Archlord Kristya 3x Hecatrice 1x Honest 3x Master Hyperion 2x Slifer the Sky Dragon 3x Tethys, Goddess of Light 3x The Agent of Creation - Venus 2x The Agent of Miracles - Jupiter 2x The Agent of Mystery - Earth 16 Spells 3x Hand Destruction 3x Magic Mallet 3x Reload 2x The Sanctuary in the Sky 2x Trade In 3x Valhalla, Hall of the Fallen 15 Extra Deck 1x Ally of Justice Catastor 1x Mist Wurm 1x Daigusto Emeral 1x Daigusto Phoenix 1x Fairy Cheer Girl 1x Gachi Gachi Gantetsu 1x Gagaga Cowboy 1x Gagagigo the Risen 1x Hieratic Sun Dragon Overlord of Heliopolis 1x Lavalval Chain 1x Leviar the Sea Dragon 1x Maestroke the Symphony Djinn 1x Number 39: Utopia 1x Steelswarm Roach 1x Temtempo the Percussion Djinn[/spoiler] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.