DN Chronicles *Remake*

[AGATHODAIMON BANGTAIL COW]

 

After a losing streak, I finally get a win that is as fabulous as Armades looks. I made Formula off of Tri-Wight, drew a Galaxy Serpent, NSed that and made Herald, then got back my dead BLS for second usage.

[Aix]

Can you change your name on DN or do these people just make new accounts for their team name?

[Toffee.]

Can you change your name on DN or do these people just make new accounts for their team name?

Yes, they do make new accounts.
Then proceed to milk wins off their old account.
I mean, how else can you explain the fact that within a day, new clan members to things have like 4353003534436 wins?

[Aix]

[Toffee.]

[spoiler=Episode 2 - Started off bad, then became good, then got so much worse]
Duel ended this way.

He forfeited the turn before, but let me explain/here's the whole duel.

Paperworks: *Sigh* Andother degenerate... He opened with just draw 1 card, and ended. He either is playing Hieratics or has Gorz
Paperworks: another*
(Legion) Subzero: actually i play to get shining out so no im not
few turns go by; By this point I know hes playing something random.
Paperworks: Barong's effect
Paperworks: Yaksha's effect
Paperworks: Garunix in my hand was destroyed
(Legion) Subzero: yea and im a degenerate
(Legion) Subzero: eff
Paperworks: You opened with just ending your turn. Your WAYY too sketchy
(Legion) Subzero: ok i couldnt do anything literally
Paperworks: And Im sure thats a lie
(Legion) Subzero: is it now He showed me his hand. Why.jpg
Paperworks: Garunix' effect
Paperworks: And you did that... Why?
(Legion) Subzero: to prove you wrong
Paperworks: But now I know, literally all your next moves.
Paperworks: So.... Yea :/
Paperworks: Yaksha's effect
(Legion) Subzero: oh yea cause i have all the cards for a move
Paperworks: Barong in hand was destroyed
Paperworks: tsk tsk tsk. Sacky cards This is when he flipped Cylinder. Why.jpg
Paperworks has lost 2700 life points
(Legion) Subzero: yea well atleast i avoid starlight road Road is a safety net. It's irrelevant here. And I'm not playing it.
Paperworks: Barong's effect
Paperworks: Bark's effect
(Legion) Subzero has lost 1600 life points
(Legion) Subzero has lost 2700 life points
(Legion) Subzero admitted defeat
Paperworks: Cylinder, literally has no place in this deck.
Paperworks: Why do you run it?
(Legion) Subzero: for him This is when he pulled Armed Lv3 from the deck.
Paperworks: No, thats not why.
Paperworks: Because thats bad reasoning
(Legion) Subzero: yea it is
Paperworks: Then you would run cards like MAsked Dragon/Flying Kamakri, instead of relying on the luck of just drawing into LV3
Paperworks: As the 2 former cards literally give you a free LV5
(Legion) Subzero: can
(Legion) Subzero: not all the time
Paperworks: Same logic applies to Cylinder
Paperworks: Literally my backrow, at this moment, is nothing but protection and/or cards that blow up Garunix. I have 2 Lance, a Call, and Fire Circle
Paperworks: I LET you Cylinder
Paperworks: Because at that point it did nothong
Paperworks: nothing*
(Legion) Subzero: alright cool
Paperworks: Really, dont rely on luck.
(Legion) Subzero: ok
Paperworks: It only means your builds are inconsistent and poorly made.
(Legion) Subzero has made a rematch offer
Paperworks: Since really, if a card has like 9001
Paperworks: 9001+ ways to get it to the field*
Paperworks: Then you literally DO NOT need to rely on just drawing it out of nowhere
(Legion) Subzero: want to put that tot the test
Paperworks: Why? Your now so sure of yourself, and in the event you win off pure luck it will prove literally nothing
(Legion) Subzero: want to face my beast deck that has no luck in it
Paperworks: LEt me guess, something stupid like Rulers, right?
(Legion) Subzero: no
(Legion) Subzero: most of them are lvl2 Oh, good, Tanuki lock. Oh joy.
Paperworks: Ahh, so its more luck-based stuff. I misread "Beast" as "Best".
(Legion) Subzero: no
Paperworks: Phh, figures.
(Legion) Subzero: and atleast my decks isnt mainstream and not original
Paperworks: No, dragons are pretty mainstream right now.
(Legion) Subzero: not this one
Paperworks: You still play all the Blue-Eyes supporty, though.
Paperworks: Which IS. DN never learns to stop contradicting itself. Why.jpg
(Legion) Subzero: ok
(Legion) Subzero: so what your playing cards that are almost like dark worlds
Paperworks: But they aren.t
(Legion) Subzero: i know i said they are like them
Paperworks: Because DWs are just 6 monsters and then 34x Dark World Dealings
(Legion) Subzero has left the duel
I decided to be a jackass and PM him
Paperworks: DWs blow up stuff on command. Garunix, while pretty absurd, isn't as mindless as Grapha. This is a stretch; Garunix is also idiotic in it's own right, but at least it isn't immortal.
(Legion) Subzero: will you stop now But I'm persistent, and your actually listening, instead of resorting to idiotic comebacks; Your a gem among DN users.
Paperworks: Plus, Garunix and Grapha run off different aspects but more of less accomplish the same result(in different ways, of course). So it's not much of a comparison between the two
(Legion) Subzero: shut up and leave me alone
Paperworks: Just run Tempests, Star Swords, and Gold Sarcoph.
Paperworks: Cuz' Banishing Tempest can search any of the Armed Dragon cards
(Legion) Subzero: i dont run a bitch card like tempest
(Legion) Subzero: that will insult my deck more
Paperworks: Then in that case you should run Masked Dragon and/or Flying Kamakiri.
Paperworks: Since, as I mentioned before, they can get you LV3 before your Standby, and already set it up for LV5
(Legion) Subzero: ok
(Legion) Subzero: i honestly dont care if i get level five or not
Paperworks: Really, you dont need to use luck as an absolute reliance. Because it will slow your deck down.
(Legion) Subzero: i dont
(Legion) Subzero: stop now
Paperworks: Also, Tempest searches LV10. So really, theres no shame in using a Ruler to search for something that isn't another copy of itself. Really, there isn't.
Paperworks: Plus, considering you could also play Forbidden Lance and what-not, it's not like it would be hard to get LV7 to the field and LV10 in your Hand
(Legion) Subzero: i dont care tempest blaster redox and tidal are all no skill cards
Paperworks: Not if you use them for what they were designed for, and not mindless spam.
(Legion) Subzero: yea but how many people truly do that
Paperworks: Thats why you should try and prove that.
(Legion) Subzero: maybe my other friend cause i said i would rather die before using them
Paperworks: Really, theres no shame in using something like Tempest, just to search another monster, instead of just playing it for the sake of spamming it.
(Legion) Subzero: i dont care
Paperworks: :/
I X'd off the conversation, he PMd me back.
(Legion) Subzero: everyone has cards they hate I can level with him here, but his views a little more obscure then mine
Few more minutes pass. He PMs me back
(Legion) Subzero: thanks for trying to help but try to do it in a more nice way HE ACTUALLY F'KING LISTENED, AND TOOK MY ADVICE INTO ACCOUNT!?!? THIS PERSON DESERVES AN INTERNET
Paperworks: I actually WAS being nice. But Im not going to sugar coat random junk like Cylinder. Really, if you want protection, then just stuff like Prison.
(Legion) Subzero: well saying my deck is crap isnt the nicest way
Paperworks: Nonono, I just was just commenting on the fact you don't need to use luck, and the fact Cylinder contributed nothing to your cause.
(Legion) Subzero: well lets says you are using a dragon deck and have the retarded five headed dragon and and your lp is at 5000 is it then
Paperworks: But then your just lucksacking the win. You didn't put effort into that play at all.
Paperworks: Also Cylinder doesn't remove the problem.
(Legion) Subzero: well you dont put effort in getting five head dragon out either
Paperworks: I didn't play FGD.
Paperworks: FGD is another story. But just because they play on a level that proves they are thick-headed, doesn't mean you have to as well. Which is DN in a nutshell
(Legion) Subzero: true as that is still hard for my deck to get rid of the card
Paperworks: You could, literally, just play Lightning Vortex.
Paperworks: Its only a Marshmallon for monsters that aren't LIGHT
Paperworks: Hell, Aremd LV7 and Tempest could make
Paperworks: Draco*
Paperworks: And then Draco destroys it via it's effect
Paperworks: And then you can use the tokens as fodder for LV5s you drew into
Paperworks: Or something like that
(Legion) Subzero: draco?
Paperworks: Mecha Phantom Beast Draccosack
(Legion) Subzero: no fuck that bitch card
(Legion) Subzero: it needs to be banned
Paperworks: Eye is more of an issue, but that's irrelevent.
(Legion) Subzero: no they both do
Paperworks: *Sigh*
Few seconds pass
(Legion) Subzero: and trishula of the ice barriers needs to be unbanned
Paperworks: .......
(Legion) Subzero: what
(Legion) Subzero: his eff isnt that good Why.jpg
Paperworks: Your actually being serious, aren't you.
(Legion) Subzero: trishula only can banish stuff if you have cards in your hand field and grave and only one
Paperworks: Aaaaaaand thats when I take my leave.
I X'd it off, and just ignored his last statement after that.[/spoiler]
tl;dr:

[goddamnit names are a pain]

I think you both were iffy in that conversation. I actually read the whole thing. XD

This part was this best.

I decided to be a jackass and PM him

 

Yes, join the club.

Paperworks: DWs blow up stuff on command. Garunix, while pretty absurd, isn't as mindless as Grapha. This is a stretch; Garunix is also idiotic in it's own right, but at least it isn't immortal.

I'm pretty sure blowing things up everywhere and everything is pretty mindless. And last I check, a phoenix is immortal.

 

(Legion) Subzero: will you stop now But I'm persistent, and your actually listening, instead of resorting to idiotic comebacks; Your a gem among DN users.

 

This guy surprised me. Stupid, but wasn't all retarded (completely, like most DN users) and I like how he didn't want to run DR. DR Suck in any deck, no offense. I just feel like every attribute deck got a Dark Armed/Krysta to a limited extent. But I'm sick of people just sacking a DR in the deck and pulling it out of now where to end the duel. DR (and revival cards in general) seem to be very annoying. An interesting concept. 

 

Is it wrong that I PM most ragers and people who lose and friend them later? About 50%, the others I just laugh at after a while.

[Aix]

I don't friend them, but I do PM them afterwards.

[goddamnit names are a pain]

Also, I think Trish really isn't that bad. Then again, I just don't care about it that much. 3 Banish is a bit much, my bad. Needs the "OPT" clause. Or just down to only 2 banished. I just think there comes a time when people rely on the Graveyard to do their work for them. Oh no, I banished a card in the graveyard. Move on. From the hand? Crap, sucky effect, Trish got what it deserved. Field? D Prison does the same thing with ease, but then again, it requires attacking and only works on monsters. I think I got inspired to make a "better" version of Trish now. XD

 

But yes, Eye is the issue (reading over again), but the guy did seem butthurt about DR. Then again, I almost wish they'd just ban/limit all the cards in the deck, unless someone can give me a card past Number 74 that doesn't deserve a punch to the face.
 

[Toffee.]

Tonight's subject is Lightsworns apparently.
[spoiler=Episode 3 - Don't forget, your here forever]
This first guy was going on and on about how Garunix was busted, and Fire Kings should die in a fire.
It's funny, because a phoenix rises from the ashes.

I didn't duel this guy, I only asked him about it because I also play Fire Kings.

Paperworks: What deck do you play, by any chance?
duelindemon: alot tbh lol i use crystals, glads, lightsworns, a normal old troll deck i made. an orig. plant, heros, and a bunch of others. what are u looking for?
Paperworks: You play Sworns, backrow decks, and your complaining about Fire Kings?
Paperworks: The hypocracy here is adorable.
duelindemon: um. ok then. heros arent a backrow deck(Alius.dek is). plants arent a back row deck, neither are glads(Glads aren't a Backrow deck? I'm in Bizarro DN apparently).
duelindemon: constellars arent I LOL'd
duelindemon: BW's arent
duelindemon: the only deck i will admit to having that is a back row deck is exodia xD Exodia isn't even a backrow deck.
duelindemon: other than that all my decks are pretty offensive
Paperworks: Really, you also play the most absurd stuff on the planet, and yet- Why are Fire Kings such an issue for you? :/
duelindemon: its not all. just that stupid Garunix. if that would get limited or even semi limited i would be alot happier xD
Paperworks: How is Garunix worse then JD? Go on. I'll listen to your reasoning.
duelindemon: garunix = nuke EVERY turn. JD = nuke as long as you have lp
Paperworks: Garunix can still be hit by Prison/Mirror Force/etc.
Paperworks: JD cant, and JD also clears backrows.
Paperworks: Add to it, JD is a hell of alot easier to play then Garunix
duelindemon: jd can be hit by prison and mirror lol
Paperworks: Judgment destroys everything on the field.
Paperworks: It cant.
duelindemon: and garunix is harder to play? tell that to 3 card garunix nuke as opposed to 4 card JD nuke
Paperworks: Recharge, and Charge. Yes, putting 4 Sworns in the Grave is SO hard.
duelindemon: you need 4 DIFFERENT. not just 4 random ones
Paperworks: This is Swrons. Thats not even hard for them.
duelindemon: unless you only have 5 or so different sworns in your deck then it can get to be a pain. i think i only have 6 different ones
Paperworks: Ryko, Lumina, Lyla, the scrub favorite
Paperworks: scrub favorite Wulf*
Paperworks: And might as well add Ehren
Paperworks: Thats at least 4, and are so ridiculously common.
duelindemon: cause they are the main sworns. of course they are going to be in a LIGHTSWORN deck
Paperworks: I thought we were playing Exodia. Oh, right.
Paperworks: Garunix at least requires you to do something, if you want to remove it ahead of time. JD is just LEL PAY 1000 AND BLOW ALL UR JUNK UP
duelindemon: meh. exodia is fun to see peoples reactions to it. most of the time i dont even get the FTK with it YouDontSay.jpg
duelindemon: ya. pay 1000. garunix is just a matter of hehe lets blow up my own card
Paperworks: You do realize that the 1000 cost means nothing, right?
duelindemon: so i can go and activate JD effect without the cost? since it means nothing?
Paperworks: You pay 1000 to deal 3000, in addition to whatever your going to Normal/Special/etc afterwords.
duelindemon: if you get down below 1000 lp before you get a JD (which any GOOD sworn player NEVER should) your fucked
Paperworks: How is that relevent? If your down to less then 1000 and your playing Sworns, then your just an awful player.
Paperworks: Life Points dont matter when your playing 1000 to swing for 1/3 of the Opponent's Life Points.
duelindemon: and should get off the game. but there are still people dumb enough who do there entire turn and THEN jd
Paperworks: And it's funny. because your implying you do just that.
duelindemon: yes ive done it before. so what? LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLOLOL
Paperworks: Also, saying "Stupid people exist; Card is balanced", is poor reasoning.
duelindemon: well if they dont know how to use it it is xD
Paperworks: Also, you cant go and say said 'stupid people' should get off DN if they are that bad, because you yourself does that as well. Now your just a hypocrite. Yes. Stupid people should get off DN. Oh, right, I keep coming back.
duelindemon: but there is also bottomless to deal with jd, warning, black horn of heaven, divine wrath, breakthrough skill, skill drain, so many other counters to it
Paperworks: So really, I don't see why Fire Kigns are that much of an issue for you, when you run plenty of decks that are fully capable of playing around it.
Paperworks: Also, same counters apply to Garunix. It's the typical 10-year-old "UMG THIS CARD HAS COUNTERS IT ISNT BUSTED, statement
Paperworks: So again, bad reasoning
duelindemon: its obvious when someone is going for jd and the opp can adapt to it. you can get garunix with one lucky top deck
Paperworks: You can also get JD with one lucky topdeck as well.
duelindemon: and saying i have "bad reasoning" when other people wouldnt even give a reason is ignorance at its finest
duelindemon: at least im explaining my thoughts in a way others wouldnt even do
Paperworks: I dont need to, because your not even giving solid evidence.
Paperworks: Bottomless isn't a counter to JUST Garuniux. It's a counter to a lot of things.
duelindemon: how am i not? ive given plenty of ways to counter JD
duelindemon: yet you still say im not giving solid evidence? O.o *Pats you on the shoulder. You never did.
Paperworks: Because said counter-measures apply to a lot of other things. Not just JD and/or Garunix.
Paperworks: Plus, Fire Kings telegraph the ever living fuck out of their plays, and you can see them coming. Sworns dont.
duelindemon: you see someone summon a lumina or celestia and you will know they are trying to dump off of the deck
Paperworks: But you dont know if they will mill any Sworns or not. It's not telegraphing anything
Paperworks: Pkus, you dont know if they have JD in-hand either.
Paperworks: Fire Kings; Barong only searches 1 of 2 cards. Yaksha either destroys Barong or Garunix. Onslaught only grabs Garunix.
Paperworks: And considering just about every card a Fire King user will Set will either be Circles or Generation Shifts, its safe to assume all their backrow is just cards that trigger Garunix.
Paperworks: So, hell, you even see their backrow coming.
Paperworks: Sworns can play whatever the hell they want. Since you just need 4 in the Graveyard and drop a 3K nuke
duelindemon: yes. 4 in the grave. all they need is a yaksha with circle and they have their nuke
Paperworks: Foolish Burial is a card. Charge into Recharge is another Foolish burial that gives you 5 more changes to send additional stuff.
Paperworks: Recharge in general helps you draw into JD, as well as put Sworns in the Grave
Paperworks: Why do you act like 4 Sworns in the Graveyard is the hardest thing to ever accomplish?
Paperworks: Really, its a lot easier then Garunix
Paperworks: Hell, just be a quitter like everyone else and resort to Exodia. Since that's more mindless then Sworns, and doesn't fear Garunix. I exaggerated the "Be a quitter" statement, but it usually gets the point across.
Paperworks: There. Problem solved.
duelindemon: mkay. if you say so. i really dont care what you say i will believe what i want and if you dont agree then that is your choice. if you say it is wrong then you are full of ignorance
Paperworks: No, Im just saying that you play enough stuff that doesn't need to worry about Garunix.
Paperworks: It hoenstly isn't an issue for you
duelindemon: it may not be but its still annoying as hell to face xD
duelindemon: that and i only have 6 traps in my sworn deck. and only one of them is bottomless xD
I stopped at this point. This guy is young, he understands his faults, and actually seemed pretty normal. So no real damage here.[/spoiler]

And of course, in the same night, I find this guy:
[spoiler=Episode 4 - Ignorance is bliss]
This guy was going on and on in the public Chat on how Sworns are the best deck, and JD is the best card.
*Sigh* And here we go....
Paperworks: So aside from Lucksworns, what else do you play? Just curious.
jakepot: lol luckworns The fact he took my sarcasm for a literal statement; This is always such a "good" sign...
jakepot: atm im trying out a six samurai deck
Paperworks: Ahh, more degenerate decks.
Paperworks: Why am I not surprised?
jakepot: i made a morphtronic deck yesterday, thats good if i get the right combo
jakepot: meh, its useless I feel sorry, for that Morphtromnic deck. It doesn't deserve an owner like this.
jakepot: i have a elemental hero and vampire deck
jakepot: lvl monster
jakepot: uhh
Paperworks: Let me stop you there.
jakepot: what do u use then?
jakepot: fire fist? This guy has a thing against Fire Fists. This is ironic.
Paperworks: What I play is irrelevent. But let me educate you on something real fast.
jakepot: that you hate certain cards? Hes one to talk
Paperworks: Outside of Chaos variants, do Sworns honestly have any consistent ways to getting JD?
jakepot: no idea what chaos variants are Its safe to say hes one of those scrubs who joined, just to play poorly made decks, and assume hes good. The typical DN user.
Paperworks: So you play a pure Sworn deck then, right?
jakepot: nope
jakepot: i have lightrays in the deck as well
jakepot: and a couple other cards
Paperworks: So you play a Sworn deck, that literally has no means of getting JD, outside of justcasually drawing into it?
Paperworks: just casually*
jakepot: you cant get jd out any other way Eclipse Wyvern. Oh, and that 1 Sworn monster that searches LIGHT Dragons, but who runs that?
Paperworks: If you played a chaos variant, you could search it via Eclipse. But by this point its irrelevent.
jakepot: o really?
Paperworks: Sworns use milling as a drawback. They have slightly stronger effects, but at the same time it eats your deck. What does JD do? It rewards you for eating a non-existant drawback.
Paperworks: And you pay 1000 to swing for 1/3 of the Opponent's Life Points
Paperworks: Add to it, it's idiotically easy to get 4 Sworns in the Graveyard.
jakepot: see
jakepot: now thats where the lightrays come in *Sigh* It doesn't end.... Does it.....
Paperworks: Now tell me, how is JD NOT a degenerate card? First time I ask.
Paperworks: And dont you DARE use Rulers as a counter argument
jakepot: sp. summon monsters with 2600-3000 atk
jakepot: jd eff first
jakepot: sp. summon them in
jakepot: easy win
Paperworks: But did you earn that?
jakepot: hate rulers, there bullshit And you play Sworns. My sides.
Paperworks: No. No you did not.
jakepot: yea i did
jakepot: i timed the win down to my last card
jakepot: literally So JD was the very last card in your deck? Really?
Paperworks: Really? Playing 40x Foolish Burials for a monster that you topdecked? Really? You earned that?
jakepot: *1 foolish burial
Paperworks: Sworns mill other Sworns, and in turn, also count for JD. They might as well be Foolish Burials.
Paperworks: Your missing the point now, and feigning ignorance. It's cute, and it proves you dont understand. Any sane man would have left this guy here. Hes just too stupid.
Paperworks: Go ahead, try and disprove the fact JD is a degenerate card. 2nd time I ask
jakepot: what deck do u use?
Paperworks: No, my decks are irrelevent. Were discussing your views on your favorite monster.
Paperworks: And you have yet to supply a reason SPOILER. HE DOESN'T. CLOSE THIS SPOILER NOW.
jakepot: i like them, they've won me like 4 different tournaments and came 2nd in 2
jakepot: fun to play with and to watch people like you get pissed over them "People like you get pissed over them. Same could apply to this guy, and Rulers/Fire Fists, it seems. Hurr.
Paperworks: So? You have yet to disprove the fact JD is poorly designed
jakepot: not reall
jakepot: hes been countered before
Paperworks: Just because counters exist, doesn't mean its any less broken. Same logic as the first guy; Kill me.
Paperworks: Since that half-assed logic means Chaos Emperor is fine at 3.
Paperworks: Which is bad reasoning.
Paperworks: So try again, please
jakepot: i got no idea who chaos emperor is soooo Pfff, what a scrub
Paperworks: http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Chaos_Emperor_Dragon_-_Envoy_of_the_End
jakepot: just cause you hate on lightsworns, doesnt mean you have to share it with everyone I never told this guy I hated them. It's funny...
Paperworks: No, Im just saying that you ignorant for not understanding that you play luck-based decks and think its skill.
jakepot: isnt everything in this game luck? Doesn't mean you should use it as a crutch, let alone the deciding factor. That just proves hes an idiot.
jakepot: you have 40 cards
jakepot: thats a 1/40 chance you will get the one card you need
Paperworks: Doesn't mean you should use it as a crutch, since thats just an excuse to prove your bad.
jakepot: not really now
jakepot: *no
Paperworks: No, it is.
Paperworks: Rulers at least search eachother. Gishkis can pick and choose their cards at will, etc, etc. So not every deck is luck based. So right off the bat, that point is now moot. I hate that I used Rulers as an example, but I had to.
Paperworks: So go on, try and disprove the fact JD is badly designed. I literally have all the time in the world to listen. 3rd time I ask
jakepot: so what deck do u use then?
jakepot: other wise i shall have to add you and watch your duels
Paperworks: I could play Exodia for all you know, a deck that literally doesn't care if you JD or not.
Paperworks: So for the 3rd time, what deck I play is irrelevent. I forget if its the 3rd or not.
jakepot: yea, but if i use lightspiral
jakepot: exodias fucked
Paperworks: Ahh, so now you even play sacky cards in this Lucksworn deck. Even better.
jakepot: lol He even acknowledged his idiocy
Paperworks: Also, Exodia decks are terrible if they let the Opponent get a turn.
jakepot: not really
jakepot: there are heaps of cards that stop people from attacking
jakepot: from using effs
Paperworks: How are those counter measuers to JD, when they also apply to everything else?
Paperworks: So again, you have yet to disprove that JD is terrible.
Paperworks: ITs because you can't. Thats why.
jakepot: you're only thinking of jd tho
Paperworks: Because without JD, Sworns are garbage. Fact. At least, until Mich n' friends hit DN.
jakepot: just cause he owns the shit out of you, doesnt mean hes useless
Paperworks: No, I said JD is badly designed. Not useless.
Paperworks: Now your not even understanding basic concepts.
Paperworks: So by this point, your as thick headed as everyone else.
Paperworks: :/ One of these days I need to find that droid factory. Gettin' tired of running into people that are literally the exact same.
jakepot: i won 2 tournaments without a jd
jakepot: so lightsworns arent useless
jakepot: just cause jd is the key card doesnt mean anything Without JD, Sworns aren't useless, but JD is the keycard? Contradictions. Contradictions everywhere.
Paperworks: Listen, if you can't understand that a card is badly designed and nothing but winmoar, then your terrible.
Paperworks: Sorry, but its true.
jakepot: its not badly designed
Paperworks: Then prove it. 4th time I ask.
jakepot: level limit area B, horn of summoning or something Level Limit is a JD counter? Since when?
Paperworks: JD can nuke Level Limit.
jakepot: any card that negates eff
Paperworks: Black Horn can also be used on other stuff.
Paperworks: And so can Veiler.
jakepot: cool
Paperworks: Thats not sufficient enough of a reason.
jakepot: so jd isnt broken
Paperworks: So your back to square 1.
jakepot: not really
Paperworks: Your the kind of person who would play Dragon Rulers, and not understand why they are such of an absurd deck, because as long as you win with them you don't care. Really, any normal person understands if their deck is stupid or not.
jakepot: i dont play dragon rulers
Paperworks: And all that does is just prove your ignorant, and a bad sport at that.
jakepot: they be bullshit
Paperworks: So are Sworns.
jakepot: not really
jakepot: unlike rulers, sworns cant throw themselves into the graveyard from your hnd
jakepot: *hand
Paperworks: No, but, you know, they always open 3x Recharge
jakepot: recharge?
Paperworks: Solar Recharge.
jakepot: i only have one
Paperworks: You play Sworns and dont know what Solar Recharge does?
Paperworks: This gets even better and better
jakepot: yea i know what it does
jakepot: but its too costly on the deck Recharge is costly in the deck? Kill me.
Paperworks: SO~ Typical counters aside that apply to every single other card on the face of the planet; Why isn't JD poorly designed? 5th time I ask. Repetitive, isn't it.
jakepot: cause hes easily countered, easy to get past
Paperworks: that doesn't disprove anything.
jakepot: other than hes easily coutnered
Paperworks: That's like saying Pot of Greed is a legit card just because people could maindeck Magic Drain. That's awful reasoning and just overall a poor ability to comprehend things.
jakepot: lol, im ranked higher than you, more wins than you, and your talking to me about shit cards huh I love how he uses the win/loss > win/loss argument, which has absolutely nothing to do with things.
Paperworks: So really, you cant disprove the fact JD is badly designed.
Paperworks: Also the fact you resorted to comparing Win/Loss ratios was the final nail in the coffin for you. Nice to know you rely on petty things that are irrelevent.
jakepot: hes not badly designed
Paperworks: No, he is. Your just too much of a meat head to understand. Arguing with a brick wall, makes more sense then this guy.
jakepot: not really, i was just wandering if you were in a duel so i could watch
jakepot: people dont hate on card effects, they hate on how it renders them useless
Paperworks: So, Jake, how about we duel, and every single duel I get to start off with all 5 pieces of Exodia in my hand.
Paperworks: Sounds fair, right?
jakepot: could happen
jakepot: there is the 5/35 chance
Paperworks: No. There isn't Because every duel I start with all Exodia parts, as I just said to you.
jakepot: o really?
Paperworks: "So, Jake, how about we duel, and every single duel I get to start off with all 5 pieces of Exodia in my hand."
Paperworks: Q4E
jakepot: so you're saying that you want to have a unfair deck ? Not sure how that's any different from his.
jakepot: hmm
jakepot: kinda makes you look pathetic Look who's talking.
jakepot: as you resort to a deck that makes you win instantly
Paperworks: no, Im playing on your terms. Since, you know, Exodia isn't badly designed at all.
Paperworks: Also you think Exodia is unfair, but play Sworns? The hypocracy in that is adorable.
jakepot: exodia isnt unfair at all, but the fact you want him instantly makes him that way
jakepot: doesnt even give me a chance
Paperworks: Really, I keep proving how much of a meat-head of you are, and that you can't even understand basic concepts. And yet, all you have is "Solemn Warning can counter JD", which doesn't make any differenc Warning can counter Chaos Emperor. Chaos Emperor should be at 3.
jakepot: other than that he isnt a bullshit card right?
Paperworks: Since, you know, Beckoning Light is a card. And so is Reincarnation, so you just payed 2000 for absolutely nothing I have no idea why I mentioned this, but if hes a Sworn player then I expect this from him.
Paperworks: So for like the 80th time, just because counter exist, doesn't make a card any less of a degenerate one.
Paperworks: Since with your logic, every card would be at 3.
Paperworks: And thats just awful.
Paperworks: I've already beaten you at least 12 times over. So by this point, your not even worth it, since you couldn't even answer the simplist of questions.
jakepot: still havent told me what deck you use, i've done 3 duels with this conversartion, and its very boring now as you think you know more than i do
jakepot: you probably use d. rulers I don't, but its funny that the shoe is on the other foot.
Paperworks: The deck I use is irrelevent, since your too arrogant to understand this game.
jakepot: i do understand it
jakepot: more than you do it seem
Paperworks: If you did understand, as you claim, then you would be able to disprove the fact that JD is badly designed.
Paperworks: Oh, right, you cant. 6th time I asked. But who's seriously counting?
jakepot: oh right
jakepot: how is he a bad card?
jakepot: you just say he is
jakepot: havent really said how
jakepot: other than hes "degenerate"
Paperworks: The card has no actual means of getting it to your hand, outside of luck-based resources. It rewards luck and doesn't promote any skill. Has a nonexistent cost for an astronomically absurd payoff-
Paperworks: And to top it off, it has no drawbacks what so ever to said payoff.
Paperworks: So yes, it is degenerate. How you couldn't see that is beyond me. It's only a few lines of text. Why doesn't he know this?
jakepot: hmm
jakepot: getting it to your hand
jakepot: monster reincarnation
Paperworks: Thats if you had it beforehand
Paperworks: Same with Beckoning Technically, if you were a jackass, you could Foolish Burial it then grab it back with one of those. But, you know, he didn't know that. So, you know, he likes to play off pure luck.
jakepot: or u could just put 3 jd in the deck
jakepot: doesnt reward luck This guy is adorable.
Paperworks: And rely on drawing into it; Because rewarding topdecking is really a good thing. Sarcasm, btw.
jakepot: as if you have under 1000 hp, you're screwed Worrying about LPs? In Sworns? My sides.
jakepot: i usually get it in my first draw, but then i only have 40 cards
Paperworks: If your playing Sworns, and your LP are under 1000, then your an awful player. So dont even use that reasoning.
jakepot: o really?
jakepot: whys that
Paperworks: And the fact you draw into it, right off the bat, just enforces the luck factor.
jakepot: umm, everything is luck based in the first draw?
Paperworks: With Sworns, yes it is.
Paperworks: Really, you have literally no means of disproving the fact JD is badly designed. Your too blinded by your ignorance and thick-headed attitude, and all it does is make you look bad. 7th time, I think.
jakepot: someones butthurt about lightsworns it seems And your resorting to insults I don't care about.
jakepot: With Sworns, yes it is.
jakepot: ^^thats ignorance
Paperworks: See, now your just proving my point about you, by resorting to petty insulsts.
jakepot: Your too blinded by your ignorance and thick-headed attitude, and all it does is make you look bad., uhh sure? I'm going to die, from a lack of breath, from laughing too hard, if this guy is actually that serious.
Paperworks: Really, we could play 50 games, and every game I start off with Exodia. Im sure by the end you wold hate Exodia.
Paperworks: Oh, right, that doesnt prove anything
jakepot: not really
Paperworks: Jake, let me ask you this. Just because you can use luck as a crutch because its a safety net for your own idiocy, why is that so important to you?
jakepot: i dont use luck as a crutch tho
Paperworks: No, you do. Your dodging the question.
Maybe 5 or so minutes passed since then. I just wanted to throw 1 last line at him, just to shake him up, one last time.
Paperworks: I applaud you for walking away and dropping this, but you are still pretty awful, and nothing can change that. Goodbye, and have a nice day. Yea.... "Good bye"....
jakepot: you seem to think you know how i duel better than i do, (I do. He wont admit it.) its not all just luck and its not a safety net as everything can go wrong in some cases Everything can go wrong. Just like this conversation. OH god why.
jakepot: now, pls let me finish my duel
Paperworks: Still didn't, answer my question, because you cant. Irony. And yes, I can let you finish luckscking. 8th or 9th time I ask; I don't care by this point.
jakepot: you havent duelled me b4, so dont judge me before you have #fite me 1v1 360 noscope headshot yolo swag
jakepot: sorry, whats the question?
jakepot: all you've said is how im a "meathead" Because its true.
Paperworks: I dont need to duel you. I've already proven everything I need to.
jakepot: not real
jakepot: ly
jakepot: you say its crap, duel me
jakepot: now
Paperworks: No, I did. Your feigning ignorance. It's cute.
jakepot: you being butthurt is cute I love when they mimic me, because they can't ever think on their toes in a scenario like this.
Paperworks: Peer pressure or not, nothing will get me duel you. I've already proven you cant understand basic concepts and your only means of a counter argument is irrelevent comebacks.
Paperworks: So on your terms; gg, no re I forgot the hashtag.
Paperworks: Bye.
Conversation went on for like another 10 minutes. I asked him another 2-3 more times to prove that JD isn't busted. Still no answer.
But what was funny, was because later on, he goes on to say that no cards are badly designed-

1st turn:

Yep. Not badly designed at all.
I got a few wins like that, and PMd him the screenshots. He didn't say anything. Pretty much I just blew his assumptions out of the water, and he ends up with egg on his face.


....Why do I even bother.[/spoiler]

[goddamnit names are a pain]

Nonononono. I know this guy on DN. Facepalm so hard....

He's a friend, cuz I friend noobs. But I can use it to "continue the interview"

He wasn't that bad at the beginning, but I couldn't read that last half entirely.

 

jakepot: fire fist? This guy has a thing against Fire Fists. This is ironic.
Paperworks: What I play is irrelevent. But let me educate you on something real fast.
jakepot: that you hate certain cards? Hes one to talk

 

Well, he didn't really say he hated anything. I remember my days with Morphtronics. LOL

And your deck is slightly relevant. Not much, but slightly.

 

And LS don't suck unless its DRLS (that badly). Wait, I'm not going there. JD sucks. The rest don't. But then that point comes up where "the deck sucks without JD" keeps happening. I quit.

 

And do LS honestly beat any tier one decks? I haven't played the actual deck, but compared to the other Tier one decks, LS kinda suck.

 

I am adding commentary tomorrow. Just process it tonight. XD

EDIT! READ ME!

Adding my conversation. Difficulty with Spoiler tag and long columns of words. Why does it look right in editing, but not in the post? Spaced idiotically now...

[spoiler=LOL]TechGenusMaster: Hey

TechGenusMaster: Can't really duel

TechGenusMaster: Tonight

jakepot: heY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

TechGenusMaster: But I wanted to talk for a few

jakepot: havent seen you in agesSSSS!!!!!!!!!

TechGenusMaster: lol

TechGenusMaster: I took a break, and I still won't be on for a couple of days.

jakepot: aw k :(

TechGenusMaster: Do not ask me how

jakepot: i'

TechGenusMaster: But I learned about a PM you had

jakepot: *i've been on a decent amount of time recently :3 

TechGenusMaster: Nice

jakepot: lol, with the paper guy?

TechGenusMaster: Yeah? How'd you know?

jakepot: cause thats the only private chat i've had today that was interesting, other than with a guy called unicorn carnage

TechGenusMaster: Lol

TechGenusMaster: Well, it was posted to a forum.

TechGenusMaster: XD

jakepot: no way

TechGenusMaster: They constantly talk about DN players

jakepot: what forum?

jakepot: teelll meee

TechGenusMaster: I don't want to telll you

jakepot: must see this

TechGenusMaster: You are kinda noobish

TechGenusMaster: I see the words for words.

jakepot: o really?

TechGenusMaster: Not too nooby, but still a little.

jakepot: wait, nooby for what?

TechGenusMaster: JD is poorly designed.

TechGenusMaster: ANd your arguement was weak.

jakepot: i was in 3 duels

TechGenusMaster: He is too easy to use

TechGenusMaster: Nukes field, etc,

TechGenusMaster: And he asked you to prove that JD was a fair card,

TechGenusMaster: It shows you couldn't about 10 times

TechGenusMaster: XD

jakepot: not unless you have less than 1000 hp, book of moon, the card that banishes instead of destroys to the graveyard

TechGenusMaster: But that doesn't actually make it not a broken cad.

TechGenusMaster: Card*

jakepot: not like black hole does the same

TechGenusMaster: You view it by how the card stands alone.

TechGenusMaster: Not the others cards on the field.

jakepot: he veiwed lightsworns by how it is "luck" based

TechGenusMaster: In reality, he nukes the field 9/10

TechGenusMaster: And ATK for 300

TechGenusMaster: 3000*

jakepot: probs around 8/10

TechGenusMaster: If you have more than 1 in hand

TechGenusMaster: 6000 damage

TechGenusMaster: which can just kill the opponent

jakepot: i've had 3 before ^_^

TechGenusMaster: Not to mention you can search him out

TechGenusMaster: See, OTK

TechGenusMaster: Not exactly legitiamte.

jakepot: there r worse cards

TechGenusMaster: But that doesn't deny the fact that JD sucks

TechGenusMaster: I know there are worse cards.

jakepot: least he has to have a minimum of 4 cards, unlike d. rulers

TechGenusMaster: But have you not seen LS DR?

jakepot: ?

TechGenusMaster: Lightsworn Dragon Rulers

jakepot: nope

TechGenusMaster: They play very well

TechGenusMaster: And JD 11/10 times.

jakepot: only other cards in my deck that arent lightsworns are lightrays

TechGenusMaster: That is nice that you play to the deck

TechGenusMaster: But it isn't hard to get 4+ in the grave

TechGenusMaster: One turn, two LS

TechGenusMaster: 4+ millied

jakepot: its very hard actually

jakepot: as not every card will be a ls

TechGenusMaster: Then you must be doing it slightly wrong. 

TechGenusMaster: Screenshot deck list?

jakepot: gimme 5 min

TechGenusMaster: I can helpish. Sometime tomorrow. But you have to promise me that you will admit JD is a broken card even in a straight up JD deck

TechGenusMaster: When I am done

TechGenusMaster: Still a broken card, but if the deck can't pull him off, you might not understand. If it happend 1/10 times, it really might not be as bad. But consistnecy makes him easy to use.

jakepot: its not consistent tho

TechGenusMaster: In your build.

jakepot: i won 2 tournaments without him

TechGenusMaster: Thats like saying Quasar is inconsistent in TGs, but he is perfectly fair.

TechGenusMaster: When in QuickDraw, Quasar in one turn happens

jakepot: no idea who quasar is

TechGenusMaster: And I win without Quasar too.

TechGenusMaster: I fought you, and didn't use Quasar?

TechGenusMaster: I need to fight you again.

TechGenusMaster: Well, I have to get going. Deck list>

jakepot: where you going to?

jakepot: and whats the forum?

TechGenusMaster: HW Town

jakepot: lol

TechGenusMaster: Not the forum

TechGenusMaster: XD

jakepot: telll meeee

TechGenusMaster: Deck. List.

TechGenusMaster: I have to go.

jakepot: the dude couldnt hold a card to his name

jakepot: all talk no duel

TechGenusMaster: I have yet to fight him, but I see how he plays. He rocks duels.

jakepot: he used a 40x forbidden deck

TechGenusMaster: Were you in Unlimited?

TechGenusMaster: That happens a lot.

jakepot: im in ranked

jakepot: all my cards are under the limit

TechGenusMaster: No, you can't fight Forbidden in ranked

TechGenusMaster: Do you mean you just saw his deck?

jakepot: i dont have any forbidden in ranked

TechGenusMaster: But you said he had a forbidden deck

TechGenusMaster: Did you mean you saw one he had?

TechGenusMaster: But not actually played against it?

jakepot: yea

jakepot: i saw him play with it

TechGenusMaster: Yeah, but that is in unlimited.

TechGenusMaster: JD sucks, and is not limited in anyway.

TechGenusMaster: Need.The.List.

TechGenusMaster: I am out in 2 minutes.

jakepot: i got 3, its limited to that

jakepot: im in a duel atm

jakepot: will send it to you when your on ext

jakepot: gotta tell me the forum tho

TechGenusMaster: Peace.

jakepot: cya

[/spoiler]

[Toffee.]

As much as I wish to be done with that guy, and no offense, but I feel sorry for the fact you have him on your list.

He wasn't that bad at the beginning, but I couldn't read that last half entirely.

No, its his attitude. As I mentioned, hes the kind of person who would play full blown Rulers, and not see the absurdity in the deck, and think it was perfectly fair.
 

Well, he didn't really say he hated anything. I remember my days with Morphtronics. LOL
And your deck is slightly relevant. Not much, but slightly.

There's nothing wrong in playing something casual.
And no, my deck wasn't relevant. That would give him an edge with no justifiable points.
 

And do LS honestly beat any tier one decks? I haven't played the actual deck, but compared to the other Tier one decks, LS kinda suck.

No, the point is that they can do other stuff; Nope. Gotta' rely on JD.

[goddamnit names are a pain]

Check my post above! Side splitting time.

rofl

[Toffee.]

Why must this now be an issue.
As if I didn't feel bad about it enough as it is.

jakepot: the dude couldnt hold a card to his name
jakepot: all talk no duel

I tend to forget that DN runs off cavemen logic.

TechGenusMaster: I have yet to fight him, but I see how he plays. He rocks duels.

No, I don't rock. I suck.

jakepot: he used a 40x forbidden deck
TechGenusMaster: Were you in Unlimited?
TechGenusMaster: That happens a lot.
jakepot: im in ranked
jakepot: all my cards are under the limit
TechGenusMaster: No, you can't fight Forbidden in ranked
TechGenusMaster: Do you mean you just saw his deck?
jakepot: i dont have any forbidden in ranked
TechGenusMaster: But you said he had a forbidden deck
TechGenusMaster: Did you mean you saw one he had?
TechGenusMaster: But not actually played against it?
jakepot: yea
jakepot: i saw him play with it

No, he literally told me that no cards are badly designed.
So as such, I had to make an '[email protected]', and show him a few examples.
I, in no way, play a deck like that on a serious level, let alone keep it for more then 5 minutes.
Also, even in that conversation you had with him just now, he STILL couldn't justify JD.
Though, to be fair, it's a trick question. But for him, its not, so I wanted to see if he could come up with something of any actual quality; Still couldn't.

[goddamnit names are a pain]

Well, I saw some wins. You did awesome compared to that guy. So yeah, you were theoretically awesome. Not a real awesome, that you can hold in your hands, but more like a conceptual awesome.

[Toffee.]

Because I'm this:
[spoiler=This]
Theory-oh/Combo-deck
[/spoiler]
When everyone else is this:
[spoiler=That]
THROW HAND ON FIELD GG
[/spoiler]

Also, most of, if not, all of said "wins" I've posted are just ones I've gotten from trimming through the fat.
Shame, really :/

[goddamnit names are a pain]

I know the feeling.

Then, I look to my favorite card and think of so many metaphors involving shining stars...

[Aix]

Chronomaly FTK

 

EDIT: Another one, this one's only an OTK.

[Bender B. Rodríguez]

Here is the reason I need to actually get Blaster. 

Also, make sure you save CED for when you need it, unlike this guy who decided bouncing my Cowboy was his main objective.

 

[Sora1499]

 

Ehehehehehehehehehe

[Toffee.]

Sora, did you REALLY draw into Dark Hole, JUST to drop 3x JD then Diabolos after?

[Sora1499]

Sora, did you REALLY draw into Dark Hole, JUST to drop 3x JD then Diabolos after?

Actually it was milled a while back.  I jestfully grabbed it back from the gy and then pretended to use it.

[Toffee.]

[spoiler=Episode 5 - Why am I still doing this?]
Me, as usual, when I see the Public Chat:

So then, I saw this guy in Public chat being all "HEI GUISE, MY 65-0 WIN STREAK IS TIER 0 LOOOOLLOLOOL"
I decided to PM him about this streak of his. When he replied-

YEP. WE GOT A BITE!

Paperworks: So, Yami, I take it your a fan of Rulers, huh? I made this assumption, mostly out of spite, and to get the obligatory 'UMG RULERZ!!!1!!11one" comment out of the way.
YamiMarik2025: what does that mean
Paperworks: Oh, just questioning your authenticity without erupting into anything un-necesary.
YamiMarik2025: duel me ill beat u Erupted: [√]
Paperworks: No, because that's irrelevent, and would just prove my point. You don't want that now, do you?
YamiMarik2025: yes i do You know your terrible when you admit to the fact your an idiot
YamiMarik2025: duel me
YamiMarik2025: now
Paperworks: I wouldn't really care if I won or lost. Really, all it does is prove your ignorant, because you can't simply answer the question of if you like playing Rulers or not.
Paperworks: Really, just say yes or no. Its not that hard.
YamiMarik2025: yes Daddy I want to get off Mr.Bones Wild Ride.
YamiMarik2025: i am Me too, son. Me too.
YamiMarik2025: i do
Paperworks: Ahh, so now we are getting somewhere. No wonder all your empty wins are so high.
YamiMarik2025: ok??
YamiMarik2025: get to the point man See, this is where you guys screw up; Why do you take my sarcastic remarks so seriously?
Paperworks: Humor me for a second; Rulers are the easiest deck to play. Correct?
YamiMarik2025: yes
Paperworks: And Rulers can toolbox the ever living hell out of themselves, without really doing anything, correct?
YamiMarik2025: yes they are
YamiMarik2025: yes they do
YamiMarik2025: get to the point
YamiMarik2025: and duel me
Paperworks: And Big Eye and Draco really take all that much effort to play, in a deck thats focused on spamming Lvl7s without any effort, right?
YamiMarik2025: i dont spam tho
Paperworks: But playing at least 2 out of nowhere, still is.
YamiMarik2025: so I don't always spam monster monsters. But when I do, I'm not spamming monsters.
Paperworks: So would you say that you are more lazy rather then competent, because your deck does all the work for you?
YamiMarik2025: i am competent and
YamiMarik2025: i just hav good cards
YamiMarik2025: but i am really competant And so is working for the redundant department of redundancy
YamiMarik2025: so duel me while we chat
Paperworks: Define "good", when every yahoo under the sun can play that deck, and literally be at your same level, as illustrated by this conversation.
Paperworks: Go on, I'll listen. Got all the time in the world =D
YamiMarik2025: lets just say im skilled possesing the nessesary skill to beat u NOW LETS DUEL
YamiMarik2025: skilled possed I'm skilled at making poses, too
Paperworks: No, that's not answering the question. Skill level and "cards being good" are unrelated to eachother.
YamiMarik2025: yea i know It's cute when people think its the same.
Paperworks: I mean, anyone could open with a hand of 5x Exodia parts. Is that skill?
YamiMarik2025: no
Paperworks: Using your logic, seemed like it is.
YamiMarik2025: its luck
YamiMarik2025: getting exodia s just luck
YamiMarik2025: so lets duel
YamiMarik2025: and enough nonsense
Paperworks: But if its luck, then how is that different, from, oh, say, Rulers, given the fact that opening with any 2 will basically result in the same thing. Hmm?
YamiMarik2025: ikd
Paperworks: Ahh, now we are getting somewhere. Because now we are at the point of where you think deck X isnt luck, only because you play it, but then deck Y IS, because your DONT play it. Of the irony, of me saying this.
Paperworks: So hypothetically, my deck I Exodia. I win the coin toss, and draw into my parts over the period of, oh, I don't know, a 20 minute turn. Could you claim that as skill?
YamiMarik2025: listen who r u WHO WAS PHONE!?
YamiMarik2025: i hav exodia deck lets see who is more perspicacious u incompetant fool
Paperworks: Just out of curiosity, how would Exodia vs Exodia prove anything, Hmm? I mean, it's literally the deck with 0 player interaction required. *Ahem* Next to Rulers, of course.
YamiMarik2025: carry on im listening
YamiMarik2025: just duel me
Paperworks: Explain to me what would dueling you prove, outside of boiling down to an ego-based contest.
Paperworks: And whos to say I might just run a self-kill deck, just to prove that point.
YamiMarik2025: i say
YamiMarik2025 has logged out
SUCCESS!

No, really, I waited like 10-15 minutes if he would come back like that other guy did; Nope.
Felt kinda' bad for this guy, though.[/spoiler]

[goddamnit names are a pain]

Paperworks: So, Yami, I take it your a fan of Rulers, huh? I made this assumption, mostly out of spite, and to get the obligatory 'UMG RULERZ!!!1!!11one" comment out of the way.
YamiMarik2025: what does that mean
Paperworks: Oh, just questioning your authenticity without erupting into anything un-necesary.
YamiMarik2025: duel me ill beat u Erupted: [√]
Paperworks: No, because that's irrelevent, and would just prove my point. You don't want that now, do you?
YamiMarik2025: yes i do You know your terrible when you admit to the fact your an idiot
 

Nice assumption. I think its funny how you think your deck is irrelevant and never seem to tell them, yet you always twist their deck out of them. It's like they lose as soon as they tell you. But, when you play Rulers, there's nothing to argue.

[Toffee.]

A- Whatever deck he played didn't matter. I just assumed Rulers because, lets be honest, it's the norm; Funny as hell when it turns out I was right.
B- I don't play Rulers.dek

And my deck is irrelevant, because they usually play something lackluster and/or solitaire-esque.

[Aix]

Beelzebuth is amazing.