Story Starter

[Aix]

So, what, in you guys' opinion, is the best way to start off a piece of fiction? Do you like to jump directly into action/good part or do you start off with a description of the setting? Perhaps a combination of both? Discuss.

[Not-so-Radiant Arin]

My literally bible doesn't actually have mentioned of which one is better, but the only thing that I have outlined is a single sentence:

 

[quote]Move quickly into action or conflict.[/quote]

 

Since I outlined the most important aspects a couple of years ago and have neglected to find anything else in the bible explaining which is better, then it pretty much must be that there is no one greater alternative over another. The only function the opening line/thesis of a book/play/novel should do is grab the attention of the reader and also give a hint of what is to be expected.

[Aerion Brightflame]

It depends really.

 

Most of the time I'll do a paragraph or two describing the setting or stuff just so that's there.

 

But sometimes I will just leap into the action somewhat, though I prefer a slower start, which then leads to action. I'd never open with action, but probably would include by the end of the first section.

[Just Crouton]

Open in the middle of an action scene (if there is any action.) An explosion is more attention-grabbing than "once upon a time."

[Umbra]

I prefer to start with some action, something to set the mood of the story. The first line is your first chance to catch the reader's eyes, to make sure that they actually care about your story. If you can grab them with that line, then they will stick around for some time.

[Dr. Cakey]

I'd say something like...if you're starting before the story gets interesting, you're probably doing it wrong.