Jump to content

Pokemon X and Pokemon Y


Tentacruel

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

[quote name='Flame Dragon' timestamp='1357852341' post='6117455']
No, it would need to be added to a type we already have. In the conversations I've had with my friends we agree that fighting would be the best choice.


[/quote]

Yes! Finally another dragon killer. God, I hate those giant lizards. Fighting would definitely be the best choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont really see the issue.

Dragon is resisted by the best defensive typing. It tends to die to the best offensive typing, sans, off the top of my head, only 4 of them.

The idea of editing types seems even worse an idea that adding new types, given it changes interactions that have gone on for [b]5 [/b]generations without it being a "new discovery" like a new type would be.

Also, I know you were being thematic, but Fighting was an awful type to choose, really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Josh Black' timestamp='1357862494' post='6117575']
I dont really see the issue.

Dragon is resisted by the best defensive typing. It tends to die to the best offensive typing, sans, off the top of my head, only 4 of them.

The idea of editing types seems even worse an idea that adding new types, given it changes interactions that have gone on for [b]5 [/b]generations without it being a "new discovery" like a new type would be.

Also, I know you were being thematic, but Fighting was an awful type to choose, really.
[/quote]
It has ONE resistance. And like I said Dragons always have a Fire/Fighting/Ground move so Steel isn't always the best counter anyway.

And I agree that it has problems, but any major change is going to have huge problems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Flame Dragon' timestamp='1357862838' post='6117582']
It has ONE resistance. And like I said Dragons always have a Fire/Fighting/Ground move so Steel isn't always the best counter anyway.

And I agree that it has problems, but any major change is going to have huge problems.
[/quote]

It's also only Super Effective against itself.

It's not as good as people say it is, it's the fact that they keep giving Dragons massive attack stats, not the typing itself. It's not really that hard to kill a dragon, especially since Ice is an easy coverage Type to get and Ice is great against so many things.

Most of them also have weaknesses to Rocks / Fighting too. And pretty much all have a x4 weakness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Josh Black' timestamp='1357867274' post='6117654']

>Muk
>Complaisn about Trubbish

Seems totally legit.
[/quote]

Muk is kind of alright, it's the sludge pokemon, I can see what your saying, but Trubbish is just trash, literally and figuratively.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='TheLaughingMan' timestamp='1357873213' post='6117752']
Muk is kind of alright, it's the sludge pokemon, I can see what your saying, but Trubbish is just trash, literally and figuratively.
[/quote]
Muk is muk. Literally and figuratively.

Gen I also has Nidoqueen/Nidoking/Rhydon.

I'm not saying any are "unoriginal", but every gen has duds ffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...