Sawk

[LC]

[img]http://i48.tinypic.com/314yzpy.png[/img]

Eh. Quality is bad.

[Sotos]

[color=#660066][font=comic sans ms,cursive]Obviously above average, but...meh. I don't really like the colors (though that's just my opinion), the lighting is too bright, and it just feels like you slapped a C4D and a render on a background. I know that's not the case, but I would like to see a more flowing and better blended piece. Remeber, the effects aren't worth it if they are just spammed. Subtlety is your friend here.

Anyway, it does have potential (and I <3 that render), soooo...keep it up [/font][/color]

[.Rai]

C4D may need backlighting due to the fact that there's no reasonable way to explain the insanely light background apart from strong lighting. Lighting also looks artificial; either define the light source as throughout the piece, or add fractals/glowing things to explain the random radiations of light.

Flow is gorgeous here. Love the circular motion of the C4D, and the overall spirally-ness of everything. Good depth too generally; perhaps slightly over-blurred on the bottom there. No massive mistake though.

Colour and contrast is really nice. Good usage of light and dark, and the overall warm feel of it to compliment Sawk's colour scheme. Wireframe C4D use was inspired. Perhaps slightly either oversharpened or LQ, but you've noted that yourself.

Overall, a good piece.

[Paradox~]

[quote name='.Rai' timestamp='1352670261' post='6066831']
C4D may need backlighting due to the fact that there's no reasonable way to explain the insanely light background apart from strong lighting. Lighting also looks artificial; either define the light source as throughout the piece, or add fractals/glowing things to explain the random radiations of light.

Flow is gorgeous here. Love the circular motion of the C4D, and the overall spirally-ness of everything. Good depth too generally; perhaps slightly over-blurred on the bottom there. No massive mistake though.

Colour and contrast is really nice. Good usage of light and dark, and the overall warm feel of it to compliment Sawk's colour scheme. Wireframe C4D use was inspired. Perhaps slightly either oversharpened or LQ, but you've noted that yourself.

Overall, a good piece.
[/quote]

I agree. :')

[Twenty-five Zero Oh-oh]

It's not bad. As stated, the lighting just looks slightly off in terms of how dark the c4d's are. It might look a little better if you burned the bg to darken the c4d's (I presume) in the distance but I'm not completely sure.