Agro Posted July 14, 2012 Report Share Posted July 14, 2012 Because I'll probably run something along these lines for fun at locals tomorrow. [img]http://i.imgur.com/3Ll66.jpg[/img] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MK-ultra Posted July 14, 2012 Report Share Posted July 14, 2012 no chaos sorc? its a good dbl sac deck though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mido9 Posted July 14, 2012 Report Share Posted July 14, 2012 Neg a reaper for a third LADD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted July 14, 2012 Author Report Share Posted July 14, 2012 [quote name='mido9' timestamp='1342296994' post='5978120'] Neg a reaper for a third LADD. [/quote]3rd LaDD is a bit much imo, but Ima neg a Reaper and a Trag for something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MK-ultra Posted July 17, 2012 Report Share Posted July 17, 2012 [quote name='Agro' timestamp='1342301866' post='5978206'] 3rd LaDD is a bit much imo, but Ima neg a Reaper and a Trag for something. [/quote] +2 chaos sorc? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b0b3rt Posted July 18, 2012 Report Share Posted July 18, 2012 Can't use tokens as XYZ materials, which is a shame. One-card Utopia plays would be hilarious. Good idea, though, I had the same one a few months ago. My deck was a bit different, though, not a chaos build. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted July 18, 2012 Author Report Share Posted July 18, 2012 [quote name='b0b3rt' timestamp='1342630845' post='5981930'] Can't use tokens as XYZ materials, which is a shame. One-card Utopia plays would be hilarious. Good idea, though, I had the same one a few months ago. My deck was a bit different, though, not a chaos build. [/quote]ITT: my goal by running sanctuary isn't to tribute them. Though I did make the mistake of putting 39 and ray in twice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
byak Posted July 18, 2012 Report Share Posted July 18, 2012 why you would main two cno39 and side gaia dragon is beyond me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newhat Posted July 19, 2012 Report Share Posted July 19, 2012 He's right. Why Dragoon? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted July 19, 2012 Author Report Share Posted July 19, 2012 [quote name='byakksmodeus' timestamp='1342649689' post='5982223'] why you would main two cno39 [/quote]As I mentioned before. When I was putting the deck together on DN, I didn't notice that I'd put the Utop and c39 in twice. [quote name='byakksmodeus' timestamp='1342649689' post='5982223'] and side gaia dragon is beyond me. [/quote]Because I haven't edited the side deck since I build the deck a few months ago, about when Gaia Dragon was announced and the deck looked a bit different. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b0b3rt Posted July 19, 2012 Report Share Posted July 19, 2012 Why would you run any rank 4 XYZs at all? You have Honest (and two sided Rai-ohs). You don't even have Mind Control to make use of C39. It's a waste of extra deck space. Not that you need much, admittedly, but I'd rather run extra copies of whatever rank 3s I used most. On another note, have you tested it? How consistent is it, given that you basically can't Duality any turn you want to summon something outside of Reaper/Sangan/Honest? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted July 19, 2012 Author Report Share Posted July 19, 2012 [quote name='b0b3rt' timestamp='1342719969' post='5982918'] On another note, have you tested it? How consistent is it, given that you basically can't Duality any turn you want to summon something outside of Reaper/Sangan/Honest? [/quote]Talk to evilfusion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.