Agro Posted May 24, 2012 Report Share Posted May 24, 2012 [img]http://i.imgur.com/gbChF.jpg[/img] Need a replacement for Forbidden Lance, as I did not side it in once today at locals and sided everything else (though it will definitely be Chalice once Battle Pack comes out.) Also looking for 1 minute change to the Main Deck to accommodate TGU upon release. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted May 24, 2012 Report Share Posted May 24, 2012 3rd Recharge Gravekeeper's Spy is an amazing TGU "replacement". Definitely better than apocralyph. Sangan is terrible without guide. Soul Taker > Smashing Ground Zenmaister and the rank 5s look a bit unneeded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted May 24, 2012 Author Report Share Posted May 24, 2012 [quote name='Manjoume Thunder' timestamp='1337843713' post='5945957'] 3rd Recharge Gravekeeper's Spy is an amazing TGU "replacement". Definitely better than apocralyph. Sangan is terrible without guide. Soul Taker > Smashing Ground Zenmaister and the rank 5s look a bit unneeded. [/quote]- 3rd Recharge is inconsistent. - Spy is nice, but I like the advantages I get off of Apocralyph (it being a Dragon and all) - Sangan would test better if I were still running the big red blobs, I'll probably replace it with something else soon. - Soul Taker vs Smashing is, honestly, completely player's choice imo, so for now, I'll stick with Smashing - Zenmaister is there for the 15 out of 16 duels that I side in Koa'ki Meiru Drago. It'll be replaced with Kachi Kochi when the time comes that I actually have one. - The Rank 5's have been testing amazingly. I probably don't need 2 of them, but I like the flexibility and, honestly, the Extra Deck is pretty fluid anyway, so it doesn't really affect the deck's consistency enough to warrant elimination just yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted May 24, 2012 Report Share Posted May 24, 2012 [quote]- Soul Taker vs Smashing is, honestly, completely player's choice imo, so for now, I'll stick with Smashing[/quote] Have you read Light Pulsar Dragon? [quote]- 3rd Recharge is inconsistent.[/quote] lol? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted May 24, 2012 Author Report Share Posted May 24, 2012 [quote name='Manjoume Thunder' timestamp='1337847881' post='5945965'] Have you read Light Pulsar Dragon? lol? [/quote]I'm running Dragons. I don't worry about LPD as much as I worry about monsters that are bigger than my dragons. The Smashings may not deal with LPD, but half the other side cards there will do it just fine. I've tested them both, I prefer using Smashing. And what I said about Recharge being inconsistent at 3 shouldn't cause you to laugh. I've tested this lengthily. I'd much rather have a Lightsworn without a Recharge in my hand than a recharge without a Lightsworn. I can't even count the number of times I've had that happen to me while testing it at 3. Lyla and Ryko are fine on their own, but Recharge? Recharge does nothing. It works much better for me @2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blazeking777 Posted June 1, 2012 Report Share Posted June 1, 2012 If you are playing 3 pulsar...why do u only have 4 dark dragons for him to bring back? I'd drop 1 pulsar add in an Interplanetarypurplythorny Dragon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted June 3, 2012 Author Report Share Posted June 3, 2012 [quote name='Blazeking777' timestamp='1338592111' post='5950579'] If you are playing 3 pulsar...why do u only have 4 dark dragons for him to bring back? I'd drop 1 pulsar add in an Interplanetarypurplythorny Dragon. [/quote]Step 1: Ignore your entire post. Step 2: Remind you that Red-Eyes Darkness Metal Dragon is a card Step 3: Remind you that Lightpulsar Dragon is a Dragon. Step 4: Don't make any changes based on your post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.