Jump to content

Mikel. Vs Enguin


mikel.

Recommended Posts

Okay this my match where we make one card that can support your card against your opponent:
Player 1: shows card
Player 2: shows that card that kills it by effect
Player 2: shows card
Player 1: shows that card that kills it by effect
Then people judge the match who is more like to win
-Thank You

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, yeah sorry i forgot really, okay here's my card!
[spoiler/]
[img]http://i1113.photobucket.com/albums/k518/ledrooney/640048636pngset12Ne1set2FWDinsettruetypeFairy20descriptionWhen20this20card20is20normal20summoned20while20there20is20spells2F20traps20in20the.jpg[/img][/spoiler][spoiler/]
Lore:When this card is normal summoned while there is spell(s)/ trap(s) in the spell and trap zone, in both players field this card get's the following effect(s) this trun it's summoned:
*This card is not affected by effects of Monster card(s).
*This card is not affected by effects of spell card(s).
*This card is not affected by effects of trap card(s).
[/spoiler]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Ęɳɢuǐɳ' timestamp='1335091969' post='5921984']
So I now show ANY card that can destroy yours? This sounds like a bad idea, I just have to make a monster with 200 ATK......Am I reading this right?
[/quote]
Not battle...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='~FoRwArD~' timestamp='1335232865' post='5923776']
Not battle...
[/quote]

So you pretty much made a card that can't be destroyed by card effects? That makes the point of the contest completely stupid and you're an a****** for trying to cheat a win like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah...I agree with Zanda on this, if the effect says it can't be destroyed by card effects, and I can't destroy it by battle, then....you've made an indestructable card that makes this contest utterly redundant.

OK then, here. I win I believe..oh wait your card can't die....ugh.

[IMG]http://i39.tinypic.com/23mpncj.jpg[/IMG]
Discard one card: Banish all effect monsters on the field, until the End Phase. This effect cannot be negated. During the End Phase of a turn you activated this effect, banish this card.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Ęɳɢuǐɳ' timestamp='1335295408' post='5924137']
Yeah...I agree with Zanda on this, if the effect says it can't be destroyed by card effects, and I can't destroy it by battle, then....you've made an indestructable card that makes this contest utterly redundant.

OK then, here. I win I believe..oh wait your card can't die....ugh.
[/quote]

Just design the card in the way that it kills S/T's, since if I am correct, which I might not be in this situation, the card gains the effects if there are S/T's in both players S/T section. So it would be sensible to make it that it kills S/T's or sth like that. Mind you I may not be correct at this time because I'm not certain if the card cares about S/T's after it's Normal Summoned, ie does it care if the S/T's are destroyed after it's Summoned or not.

But for some reason, I have this hunch that Mikel made the card with the idea that if the S/T's are removed from the field later on, the card still keeps the effects. SO F[b]U[/b]CK YOU MIKEL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Zanda Panda' timestamp='1335295831' post='5924165']
Just design the card in the way that it kills S/T's, since if I am correct, which I might not be in this situation, the card gains the effects if there are S/T's in both players S/T section. So it would be sensible to make it that it kills S/T's or sth like that. Mind you I may not be correct at this time because I'm not certain if the card cares about S/T's after it's Normal Summoned, ie does it care if the S/T's are destroyed after it's Summoned or not.

But for some reason, I have this hunch that Mikel made the card with the idea that if the S/T's are removed from the field later on, the card still keeps the effects. SO F[b]U[/b]CK YOU MIKEL.
[/quote]
So offensive, when i [b]summon [/b]my card then it takes it's effects,[color=#0000cd] "while there is spell(s)/ trap(s) in the spell and trap zone, in both players field" [/color]so he can make a card that can stop me from summoning or something like "when your opp, actives etc..you know then he all has to think if i had gone first, or if i had gone last what could my card do?..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...