Welche the crab Posted February 25, 2012 Report Share Posted February 25, 2012 [url="http://www.nationstates.net/"]http://www.nationstates.net/[/url] Really fun game. You make a country and get issues every so often [you pick how often] and these decisions guide your country in whatever path they would in real life. My country: [url="http://www.nationstates.net/nation=land_of_the_free_sheep"]http://www.nationsta..._the_free_sheep[/url] If you want I can explain the economic benefits of free sheep. http://www.nationstates.net/region=ycmlandia Join our region! Pass is YCMLandia. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Not-so-Radiant Arin Posted February 25, 2012 Report Share Posted February 25, 2012 In a realistic sense, being a dictator ensures that your people will follow you down the path, no matter what. If you are benevolent, someone will always try to take that position for themselves, and some people will start to become jealous of other people because they got gifts while the others didn't. If you're a dictator, sure you have a strict rule, but there is an equal, level field across all boards of spectrum, although it may not be the nicest kind of rule. This issue is stretched in the game I'm making, "The Promised Land", in which the main antagonist preaches that his rule is the best fit for a broken country, but instead takes his "dictatorship" for "absolute control". As for the game in the OP, I'll check it out later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeal Ascendant Posted February 25, 2012 Report Share Posted February 25, 2012 Why didn't you name it Welchelandia or The Holy Republic of Welche? Then it could have King Welche, Prince Welche, and [s]Crossdressing [/s]Princess Welche as its monarchy! Instead, you go for sheep or something... what? Anyway, I'll check it out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demon Loki Posted February 25, 2012 Report Share Posted February 25, 2012 I don't know. I'm not really a born leader. But i'll give it a try i guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CMRenji Posted February 25, 2012 Report Share Posted February 25, 2012 Totally Liberalizing the HELL out of this game. Here's my country so far: [url="http://www.nationstates.net/nation=mignognia"]http://www.nationstates.net/nation=mignognia[/url] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeal Ascendant Posted February 25, 2012 Report Share Posted February 25, 2012 [url]http://www.nationstates.net/nation=raging_earth[/url] Yeah Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted February 25, 2012 Report Share Posted February 25, 2012 I win http://www.nationstates.net/nation=team_rocket_land Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ieyasu Tokugawa Posted February 25, 2012 Report Share Posted February 25, 2012 [quote name='~~Xiahou Dun~~' timestamp='1330192217' post='5839919'] In a realistic sense, being a dictator ensures that your people will follow you down the path, no matter what. [/quote] No it doesn't. It ensures you'll rule a country with an iron fist until somebody's able to rally people into a large enough army to throw more dipsh*ts than you can kill off until you finally fall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Leo Posted February 25, 2012 Report Share Posted February 25, 2012 [url="http://www.nationstates.net/nation=dominion_of_1337"]http://www.nationstates.net/nation=dominion_of_1337[/url] This game looks hilariously addicting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Welche the crab Posted February 25, 2012 Author Report Share Posted February 25, 2012 The best part is when you get hilarious options like once a drunk guy suggested I ban elections (an option my brother opted to take) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tentacruel Posted February 25, 2012 Report Share Posted February 25, 2012 It was fun until I had to choose between burning Harry Potter books and dismissing religious people as wackos. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CMRenji Posted February 25, 2012 Report Share Posted February 25, 2012 [quote name='Comrade Trollestia' timestamp='1330213507' post='5840680'] It was fun until I had to choose between burning Harry Potter books and dismissing religious people as wackos. [/quote] If you don't like either option, you can just dismiss the issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Welche the crab Posted February 25, 2012 Author Report Share Posted February 25, 2012 I got that one. I upheld freedom of expression. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tentacruel Posted February 26, 2012 Report Share Posted February 26, 2012 [quote name='Welche' timestamp='1330213735' post='5840687'] I got that one. I upheld freedom of expression. [/quote] But to uphold freedom of expression you would have to accommodate both parties. Freedom of expression means being able to read, write or even condemn what you wish. So you would have to essentially protect the book, whilst allowing the annoying people to complain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Welche the crab Posted February 26, 2012 Author Report Share Posted February 26, 2012 They can condemn the heck out of it, but my children will he allowed to read Harry Potter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piercer of the Heavens Posted February 26, 2012 Report Share Posted February 26, 2012 [quote name='Monsieur Léo' timestamp='1330200209' post='5840256'] This game looks hilariously addicting. [/quote] ^ ditto [url="http://www.nationstates.net/nation=giggi"]http://www.nationstates.net/nation=giggi[/url]Someone should create a YCM region. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tentacruel Posted February 26, 2012 Report Share Posted February 26, 2012 [quote name='Welche' timestamp='1330214702' post='5840742'] They can condemn the heck out of it, but my children will he allowed to read Harry Potter. [/quote] Exactly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lt. Colonel Remo Posted February 26, 2012 Report Share Posted February 26, 2012 [url="http://www.nationstates.net/nation=rome_redivivus"]http://www.nationstates.net/nation=rome_redivivus[/url] *has a FSM flag* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted February 26, 2012 Report Share Posted February 26, 2012 [quote name='Welche' timestamp='1330213735' post='5840687'] I got that one. I upheld freedom of expression. [/quote] I hope you know there are limits to what you can do with that. Suppose a guy decides to go around with a shotgun firing shots into the air to express himself. He's not hurting anyone, but you going to allow that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Welche the crab Posted February 26, 2012 Author Report Share Posted February 26, 2012 Actually evidence is that he is hurting someone because those bullets do land and damage others property. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lt. Colonel Remo Posted February 26, 2012 Report Share Posted February 26, 2012 You say hurtful things I'm a fragile flower and go on a rampage due a mental condition Who is at fault? Me or the guy who got me to act that way? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Welche the crab Posted February 26, 2012 Author Report Share Posted February 26, 2012 How does that have anything to do with freedom of expression? Your looking at freedom of speech but since I believe in the harm principle as I remember it being called so that should answer those questions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted February 26, 2012 Report Share Posted February 26, 2012 [quote name='Welche' timestamp='1330221307' post='5841028'] Actually evidence is that he is hurting someone because those bullets do land and damage others property. [/quote] and if there's no evidence to property damage? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Welche the crab Posted February 26, 2012 Author Report Share Posted February 26, 2012 There is so your question is invalid. Of course I will have strict gun regulations because of said harm principle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted February 26, 2012 Report Share Posted February 26, 2012 [quote name='Welche' timestamp='1330222721' post='5841111'] There is so your question is invalid. Of course I will have strict gun regulations because of said harm principle. [/quote] All you need then is to go to the UK. Most of their police force don't have so many firearms Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.