Jump to content

another HOME other than earth??


Akeno_Ederis_17

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Planet X is a planet larger than Earth and belonging to another solar system entirely.
However, it has water and plant life, which would make human life sustainable.
I believe it takes 200 or so years to reach it, if I remember old articles correctly. This is like 2010 news, so I've probably gotten something wrong.

But basically, it's Earth = more world mass.:)
Therefore somewhat ideal conditions, except for the destination time.

I would personally love to live in an artificial Atlantis. That would be absolutely amazing. Except for when sharks blood from us and slam against the airtight barriers, thus breaking them and drowning us.
However, if we could tame sharks, oh heck yeeeeess.

Sky cities would be cool to mkay.


Cloud Seeding?
Ok, I read a childrens book that had that, I know what it is :P
I'm guessing using special equipment to rub dry ice together wouldn't be able to help lightning along, would it?
[s]ie, static electricity[/s]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

then xtratrestrial life just got serious xD

how did they discovered planet x? i doubt that it will only take 200years... maybe longer??

iwould pity that planet if the humans reached it and destroyed it like what we are doing on
our planet..

BTW ,, how big is it??like saturn or jupiter ?or slightly larger than earth??


i dislike artificial atlantis,,, i fear water soo much...
i prefer sky cities,,but that would destroy the earth more,,im 100% positive xD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=or1Mb1Vje1Q

Also, Global Warming can be stopped. It's just that things with the climate will get worse even if we stop CO2 emissions, because of the atmospheric lag. The problem, imo, with Global Warming is that each country is left to figure out what to do alone. Instead of someone (America always wants to be it) stepping up as a leader and takes the first steps in making a greener world.

But lobbyist are going to be the end of us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='ragnarok1945' timestamp='1329652766' post='5826567']
Maybe in Seattle where it rains like 24/7 for 9 months of the year, but that's it
[/quote]

how about drought ??


[quote name='Legend Zero' timestamp='1329654186' post='5826576']
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=or1Mb1Vje1Q[/media]

Also, Global Warming can be stopped. It's just that things with the climate will get worse even if we stop CO2 emissions, because of the atmospheric lag. The problem, imo, with Global Warming is that each country is left to figure out what to do alone. Instead of someone (America always wants to be it) stepping up as a leader and takes the first steps in making a greener world.

But lobbyist are going to be the end of us.
[/quote]

global warming can be stopped? i heard from my profthat it can't be,, but in can be slowed,, because we cant repair the ozone layer... plus.. if we were to stop it then that means :

no more factories

no more gasoline using vehicles

no more plastic

no more electricity

no more tree cutting

meaning

different lifestyle which humans cant afford to have (im 90% positive!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='sIege-eI' timestamp='1329655815' post='5826590']
global warming can be stopped? i heard from my profthat it can't be,, but in can be slowed,, because we cant repair the ozone layer... plus.. if we were to stop it then that means :

no more factories

no more gasoline using vehicles

no more plastic

no more electricity

no more tree cutting

meaning

different lifestyle which humans cant afford to have (im 90% positive!)
[/quote]
Most countries are switching to emission free energy on their own. I predict within the next decade that solar and wind will dramatically increase, once it's price is just low enough.

We don't need to stop completely, just cut back A LOT. The Ozone will repair itself, given time.

I'll upload a few pdfs of material from my class, if you want?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='sIege-eI' timestamp='1329628502' post='5826158']
everything on earth is getting freaky and all we do is say "everything on earth is getting freaky" ,, it is already disclosed that global warming CANNOT be stopped.. meaning if we want our civilizations to continue ,, we must leave earth,,, but the question is will that be possible?
[/quote]
Also Earths magnetic field is spiraling out of control, constantly decreasing and increasing as time goes by with no reason to explain it which is coupling 2012 goers in how on December 21 2012 all the planets will be alligned and all that jazz.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Cronus' timestamp='1329671946' post='5826934']
Also Earths magnetic field is spiraling out of control, constantly decreasing and increasing as time goes by with no reason to explain it which is coupling 2012 goers in how on December 21 2012 all the planets will be alligned and all that jazz.
[/quote]

what is the relation between the gravity of earth and the allignment?? ??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the rate we're polluting, there is no chance of us moving onto a new planet. Terraforming a planet would cost unimaginable amounts of money, labor, and time. A small space colony on the Moon or Mars may be possible within the next 50-100 years though. But they would need constant aid from Earth.

We need to get the hell of oil, and move on to renewable resources. I imagine someday, we'll hopefully completely lose our dependency on oil, and use Solar power, wind power etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='CM Renji' timestamp='1329681650' post='5827232']
At the rate we're polluting, there is no chance of us moving onto a new planet. Terraforming a planet would cost unimaginable amounts of money, labor, and time. A small space colony on the Moon or Mars may be possible within the next 50-100 years though. But they would need constant aid from Earth.

We need to get the hell of oil, and move on to renewable resources. I imagine someday, we'll hopefully completely lose our dependency on oil, and use Solar power, wind power etc.
[/quote]Pollution has a lot to do with it, but the CO2 levels have been this bad before, so it doesn't matter. Oil will always be something we depend on, we just need to ration it. Wind Power is so inconsistent and Solar power is relying on the sun. It doesn't hold the energy of the sun. Have you learned about the Greenhouse effect? Yeah. Radiation from the sun into the earth is equal to the radiation being released. Light is also being reflected. We won't always have light, but we will have heat from the sun. We need to find a way to contain that heat, which is the "solar" power.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Ɽarity' timestamp='1329682624' post='5827263']
Pollution has a lot to do with it, but the CO2 levels have been this bad before, so it doesn't matter. Oil will always be something we depend on, we just need to ration it. Wind Power is so inconsistent and Solar power is relying on the sun. It doesn't hold the energy of the sun. Have you learned about the Greenhouse effect? Yeah. Radiation from the sun into the earth is equal to the radiation being released. Light is also being reflected. We won't always have light, but we will have heat from the sun. We need to find a way to contain that heat, which is the "solar" power.
[/quote]
It wouldn't be [i]as [/i]bad if it weren't for us. And we'd be a lot better if someday we completely got rid of oil, rather than just rationing it. I'm not saying that we need to just stop cold turkey, just get off it in like 50-200 years time.

But if we can truly never get off oil, then I suppose a world with just small oil use would be fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='CM Renji' timestamp='1329686354' post='5827418']

It wouldn't be [i]as [/i]bad if it weren't for us. And we'd be a lot better if someday we completely got rid of oil, rather than just rationing it. I'm not saying that we need to just stop cold turkey, just get off it in like 50-200 years time.

But if we can truly never get off oil, then I suppose a world with just small oil use would be fine.
[/quote]What wouldn't be as bad? CO2 levels were like this before even a little pollution, it changes all the time. If we got rid of oil, everything would change. Some people can handle that, but it would cause too much problems. If we ration it, we would be less dependent and change wouldn't be as drastic. But 50-200 years is annoying. 50 years is more than half of a human life time and 200 is beyond 2 life times. How would that work?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Ɽarity' timestamp='1329686598' post='5827425']
What wouldn't be as bad? CO2 levels were like this before even a little pollution, it changes all the time. If we got rid of oil, everything would change. Some people can handle that, but it would cause too much problems. If we ration it, we would be less dependent and change wouldn't be as drastic. But 50-200 years is annoying. 50 years is more than half of a human life time and 200 is beyond 2 life times. How would that work?
[/quote]
A little pollution? No, we pollute a lot. Our pollution may not be causing Global Warming, but it's as sure as hell helping it. :I

Rationing it is a good idea, and that's what we should do. Eventually, the oil will run out. So, we should slowly be turning away from oil, and using more and more renewable energy resources. Not just stop with oil, but slowly get off it.

And I'm not sure what you mean by that last part. 50-200 years is what I assume is how long it will take to totally/mostly get off oil.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='CM Renji' timestamp='1329687850' post='5827469']

A little pollution? No, we pollute a lot. Our pollution may not be causing Global Warming, but it's as sure as hell helping it. :I

Rationing it is a good idea, and that's what we should do. Eventually, the oil will run out. So, we should slowly be turning away from oil, and using more and more renewable energy resources. Not just stop with oil, but slowly get off it.

And I'm not sure what you mean by that last part. 50-200 years is what I assume is how long it will take to totally/mostly get off oil.
[/quote]I was talking about the past when I spoke about pollution. We need more time to figure out how to find a substance that is equivalent to oil, which is why we should ration it. And 50 years is too much. If you look at how much oil we consumed over the past few years, you can figure out that we don't have that much time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='CM Renji' timestamp='1329687850' post='5827469']
A little pollution? No, we pollute a lot. Our pollution may not be causing Global Warming, but it's as sure as hell helping it. :I

Rationing it is a good idea, and that's what we should do. Eventually, the oil will run out. So, we should slowly be turning away from oil, and using more and more renewable energy resources. Not just stop with oil, but slowly get off it.

And I'm not sure what you mean by that last part. 50-200 years is what I assume is how long it will take to totally/mostly get off oil.
[/quote]

That's the problem with renewable energy sources, people seem slow to realize the problem until something significant happens to change their minds.

For example if you look at the preservation of the environment in the US. Back in the early 1900s everyone still had the mentality that this task would take decades to do (which they were right), whereas the economy was something they had to worry about on the DAILY basis.

Therefore, under that logic it was better to ignore the evironmental problem and let it figure itself out. And look where that ended up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...