Kazooie Posted March 3, 2012 Report Share Posted March 3, 2012 [quote name='evilchris' timestamp='1330741465' post='5852961'] Evan, there's really no problem with his Convulsion deck, he plays it as both players having to just banish the top card of their deck so they always know what it is. [/quote] It's an unnecessary hassle honestly. I don't think we should be bothered to do that with the stupid way DN is. Just seems a bit silly. They should just implement the feature or take the card off, preferably the first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Account is Unplayable Posted March 3, 2012 Report Share Posted March 3, 2012 [quote name='Kanade Otonashi' timestamp='1330742260' post='5852991'] It's an unnecessary hassle honestly. I don't think we should be bothered to do that with the stupid way DN is. Just seems a bit silly. They should just implement the feature or take the card off, preferably the first. [/quote] I suppose. I never had any issues playing against it. It's the rest of his deck that's boring to play again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IceDorago Posted March 3, 2012 Report Share Posted March 3, 2012 DN doesn't support some stuff just because it's not widely used, which its stupid, since if a card can utilize it, it should be an implemented feature. Especially things like directly sending monsters to S/T since Inzektors and revealing off the top of the deck are the most important that aren't implimented, I'd think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DLÂ Posted March 3, 2012 Report Share Posted March 3, 2012 [quote name='evilchris' timestamp='1330742693' post='5853014'] I suppose. I never had any issues playing against it. It's the rest of his deck that's boring to play again. [/quote]What does a convulsion of nature deck specialize in? O.o Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Account is Unplayable Posted March 3, 2012 Report Share Posted March 3, 2012 [quote name='The Real DL' timestamp='1330742839' post='5853026'] What does a convulsion of nature deck specialize in? O.o [/quote] Gishki Diviner and that one Archfiend card that allows a player to call the top card of their deck, if they get it right they can draw it. Basically it gives a lot of free draws. Also helpful for Diamond Dude. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IceDorago Posted March 3, 2012 Report Share Posted March 3, 2012 I kind of want to make that loldeck that consists purely of cards that screw with DN limitations now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IceDorago Posted March 3, 2012 Report Share Posted March 3, 2012 [quote name='Aggro' timestamp='1330743871' post='5853121'] It's been done. [/quote] Yeah, by you, right? Ah well, at least want to make Convulsion or something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted March 3, 2012 Author Report Share Posted March 3, 2012 Not by me. Oh, two new tournament notes for everyone: #1. You will no longer gain use of ALL of the Numbers of the opponent you defeat, just that player's assigned number. That way you will reach the maximum 15 card extra deck only when reaching the finals. #2. There will be 2 play in games. The winner of these play-in games will be given the choice to replace their main number with their opponent's main number if they so choose. You do not get both numbers going into the next round, only one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Account is Unplayable Posted March 3, 2012 Report Share Posted March 3, 2012 What do you mean exactly by a play-in game? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted March 3, 2012 Author Report Share Posted March 3, 2012 [quote name='evilchris' timestamp='1330745412' post='5853288'] What do you mean exactly by a play-in game? [/quote]We have 18 players. We need 16. 2 matches are going to be played just before the first round. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ieyasu Tokugawa Posted March 3, 2012 Report Share Posted March 3, 2012 [quote name='IceDorago' timestamp='1330743042' post='5853041'] I kind of want to make that loldeck that consists purely of cards that screw with DN limitations now. [/quote] It's been done and people get warnings for trolling. J/s. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DLÂ Posted March 3, 2012 Report Share Posted March 3, 2012 [quote name='Ieyasu Tokugawa' timestamp='1330745637' post='5853315'] It's been done and people get warnings for trolling. J/s. [/quote]lol XD [quote name='Aggro' timestamp='1330745618' post='5853309'] We have 18 players. We need 16. 2 matches are going to be played just before the first round. [/quote]2 people are gonna be eliminated? [quote name='Aggro' timestamp='1330745340' post='5853275'] Not by me. Oh, two new tournament notes for everyone: #1. You will no longer gain use of ALL of the Numbers of the opponent you defeat, just that player's assigned number. That way you will reach the maximum 15 card extra deck only when reaching the finals. #2. There will be 2 play in games. The winner of these play-in games will be given the choice to replace their main number with their opponent's main number if they so choose. [/quote]..what's the point of having different main number? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IceDorago Posted March 3, 2012 Report Share Posted March 3, 2012 How the hell would I get warned here for playing a stupid deck on DN? And point of a different main number is if you got Illumiknight and your play-in opponent had Utopia, and you won... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted March 3, 2012 Author Report Share Posted March 3, 2012 [quote name='The Real DL' timestamp='1330746228' post='5853380'] lol XD 2 people are gonna be eliminated? ..what's the point of having different main number? [/quote]Cause having that extra game would mean the players in it would go to 16 cards. EDIT of NOTE: You do not gain your Opponent's number in the play-in game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ieyasu Tokugawa Posted March 3, 2012 Report Share Posted March 3, 2012 [quote name='The Real DL' timestamp='1330746228' post='5853380'] lol XD 2 people are gonna be eliminated? ..what's the point of having different main number? [/quote] Because you're current main number may be utter crap Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IceDorago Posted March 3, 2012 Report Share Posted March 3, 2012 [quote name='Aggro' timestamp='1330746310' post='5853389'] Cause having that extra game would mean the players in it would go to 16 cards. EDIT of NOTE: You do not gain your Opponent's number in the play-in game. [/quote] So either you swap your for theirs or you keep yours, but you won't have two after that, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DLÂ Posted March 3, 2012 Report Share Posted March 3, 2012 [quote name='Aggro' timestamp='1330746310' post='5853389'] Cause having that extra game would mean the players in it would go to 16 cards. EDIT of NOTE: You do not gain your Opponent's number in the play-in game. [/quote]oooh this explains it no, I thought you still got it In that case, it makes sense Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted March 3, 2012 Author Report Share Posted March 3, 2012 [quote name='IceDorago' timestamp='1330746444' post='5853401'] So either you swap your for theirs or you keep yours, but you won't have two after that, right? [/quote]Yes, but this is only relevant to whomever gets put in the play-in games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IceDorago Posted March 3, 2012 Report Share Posted March 3, 2012 Well, obviously. What would be the point in a Numbers tournament if you didn't take the defeated's number? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted March 3, 2012 Author Report Share Posted March 3, 2012 [quote name='IceDorago' timestamp='1330749330' post='5853490'] Well, obviously. What would be the point in a Numbers tournament if you didn't take the defeated's number? [/quote]But now instead of getting all of them, you only get their main one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DLÂ Posted March 3, 2012 Report Share Posted March 3, 2012 which makes more sense Unless the original extra deck consisted ONLY of your number >> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IceDorago Posted March 3, 2012 Report Share Posted March 3, 2012 Yeah, unless we were all being Yumas and having our starting Extra consist of one Number, this way is much better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dwarven King Posted March 3, 2012 Report Share Posted March 3, 2012 So...until I win a better Number...I'm stuck relying on the remaining 11 monsters in my extra deck. .-. [quote name='evilchris' timestamp='1330715459' post='5852162'] Threatening Roar is a bad -1. RotA helps add the one thing LS don't have; Consistency. And I'd highly advise shrinking to 40 cards, you need all the consistency boosts you can get. Losing 3 Roars, Wyvern and Trag while adding RotA would help here. [/quote] ....no. Roar is good. >.< Yes, because grabbing one of the THREE cards in my deck that aren't even worth the time makes my deck SO much more consistent, doesn't it? Also, my deck is pretty damn consistent. :< Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ieyasu Tokugawa Posted March 3, 2012 Report Share Posted March 3, 2012 [quote name='Dwarven King' timestamp='1330753410' post='5853553'] ....no. Roar is good. >.< [/quote] In stall. LS are not stall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dwarven King Posted March 3, 2012 Report Share Posted March 3, 2012 Hmm...all I have is a monster to make me mill, but it will die so easily. *sets roar* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.