Βyakuya Posted February 8, 2012 Report Share Posted February 8, 2012 Ancient Leaf can be easily banned. It's an easy Pot of Greed and the large amount of LP makes the 2000 pay seem worthless. For Wyvern, it varies, so placing it at @1 or @2 is fine. BTW Can anyone give helpful feedback on this deck? [img]http://i.imgur.com/VEa3u.jpg[/img] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted February 8, 2012 Report Share Posted February 8, 2012 Wyvern doesn't deserve a ban because it requires some actual effort to use it at the right time, not HERPDERPAUTO50000ATK ._. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Account is Unplayable Posted February 8, 2012 Report Share Posted February 8, 2012 -2 Captain -3 Spell Striker -1 Creature Swap -2 Barbaros +2-3 TG1-EM1 +1 Horn +1 Warning +1 Torrential +2-3 of any of Bottomless/D-Prison/Fiendish Chain if you really want. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted February 8, 2012 Author Report Share Posted February 8, 2012 [quote name='Relius Clover' timestamp='1328725841' post='5804623'] Wyvern doesn't deserve a ban because it requires some actual effort to use it at the right time, not HERPDERPAUTO50000ATK ._. [/quote]The only thing I'm worried about is its use in SigmaOTK. :\ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Βyakuya Posted February 8, 2012 Report Share Posted February 8, 2012 [quote name='Evil Tristan' timestamp='1328725888' post='5804625'] -2 Captain -3 Spell Striker -1 Creature Swap -2 Barbaros +2-3 TG1-EM1 +1 Horn +1 Warning +1 Torrential +2-3 of any of Bottomless/D-Prison/Fiendish Chain if you really want. [/quote] Thanks Tristan. But I may consider keeping a few copies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Account is Unplayable Posted February 8, 2012 Report Share Posted February 8, 2012 [quote name='Ζ-ONE' timestamp='1328726257' post='5804638'] Thanks Tristan. But I may consider keeping a few copies. [/quote] Well seeing as Captain and Spell Striker are bad to begin with, then Skill Drain ruins them entirely, those definitely need to go. Creature swap is completely outclassed by TG1-EM1 in T.G.s. Barbaros is the only option arguably worth keeping. Even then, you need more of the anti-meta traps/staple traps I suggested. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DL Posted February 8, 2012 Report Share Posted February 8, 2012 I'd take out the 2 Barbaros, 1 Rhino, 1 Spell Striker, and both Marauding Captains And add in 3 Tour Guides and 3 Kagemucha Knight But that's just me Seeing as your deck focuses a lot on rank 3 xyzs, it'd be good to have those 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Βyakuya Posted February 8, 2012 Report Share Posted February 8, 2012 [quote name='Evil Tristan' timestamp='1328726446' post='5804645'] Well seeing as Captain and Spell Striker are bad to begin with, then Skill Drain ruins them entirely, those definitely need to go. [b]Well I guess I can agree with that.[/b] Creature swap is completely outclassed by TG1-EM1 in T.G.s. [b]True, True...[/b] Barbaros is the only option arguably worth keeping. Even then, you need more of the anti-meta traps/staple traps I suggested. [b]I'm debating myself on what staples I'll use so..yeah.[/b] [/quote] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Account is Unplayable Posted February 8, 2012 Report Share Posted February 8, 2012 [quote name='Sploosh' timestamp='1328726482' post='5804646'] I'd take out the 2 Barbaros, 1 Rhino, 1 Spell Striker, and both Marauding Captains And add in 3 Tour Guides and 3 Kagemucha Knight But that's just me Seeing as your deck focuses a lot on rank 3 xyzs, it'd be good to have those 2 [/quote] This makes more sense in decks that don't have such an anti-meta focus. T.G.s are entirely anti-meta, making these options bad for the deck in general. And rank 3 spam is done better entirely by Wind-Ups and Inzektors or even a hybrid of the both. T.G.s have the niche role of never running out of resources so they can play anti-meta and just sit on 1 card very easily, so the deck should capitalise on that and not try to do something it can't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Βyakuya Posted February 8, 2012 Report Share Posted February 8, 2012 [quote name='Sploosh' timestamp='1328726482' post='5804646'] I'd take out the 2 Barbaros, 1 Rhino, 1 Spell Striker, and both Marauding Captains [b]Barbaros for the Skill Drain. It's quite meh to be in there really. But I need as much Rhinos to search other T.Gs Fluttershy.[/b] And add in 3 Tour Guides and 3 Kagemucha Knight [b]I dunno if I have space for that...[/b] But that's just me Seeing as your deck focuses a lot on rank 3 xyzs, it'd be good to have those 2 [b] You need to get a new pair of glasses.[/b] [/quote] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted February 8, 2012 Author Report Share Posted February 8, 2012 If he wants to trollface he could just use 2 Maxx "C" and 3 Photon sabre Tigers instead of the Spell Striker and Captains Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Βyakuya Posted February 8, 2012 Report Share Posted February 8, 2012 I got rid of the Captains. Any other good monster replacements for Spell Striker? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Account is Unplayable Posted February 8, 2012 Report Share Posted February 8, 2012 [quote name='Ζ-ONE' timestamp='1328727214' post='5804668'] I got rid of the Captains. Any other good monster replacements for Spell Striker? [/quote] I don't get why you want more monsters. The whole idea of T.G.s is that you don't run many monsters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DL Posted February 8, 2012 Report Share Posted February 8, 2012 I saw 4 lvl 3 xyzs And I'm still not sure what Gem-Knight Pearl is doing there Or Gaia And you can easily take out the Skill Drains for Torrential, Warning, and possibly something else And see If you have 3 rhinos You get better chance of drawing rhino Which lets you search If you have 1 less rhino It's still the same exact chance you'll get a tg striker or warwolf imo, of course Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted February 8, 2012 Author Report Share Posted February 8, 2012 TRis has a point here. Horn, TT, and Warning seem like good replacements. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DL Posted February 8, 2012 Report Share Posted February 8, 2012 [quote name='Wraith' timestamp='1328727477' post='5804673'] TRis has a point here. Horn, TT, and Warning seem like good replacements. [/quote] I said TT and Warning too- *shot* Perfectly good 3 replacement for 3 skill drain, which gets rid of Balbaros, which frees up deck space Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted February 8, 2012 Author Report Share Posted February 8, 2012 [quote name='Sploosh' timestamp='1328727558' post='5804677'] I said TT and Warning too- *shot* Perfectly good 3 replacement for 3 skill drain, which gets rid of Balbaros, which frees up deck space [/quote]Why? Then again, you could replace 2 Barbaros w/o skill drain with 2 Wang-Hu to f*ck with people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Account is Unplayable Posted February 8, 2012 Report Share Posted February 8, 2012 WHY do you want to get rid of Skill Drain? Without it you may as well scrap the entire deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Βyakuya Posted February 8, 2012 Report Share Posted February 8, 2012 Skill Drain is the point of the deck, thus anti-meta Fluttershy. And it explains why I tech Barbaros in there. .__. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DL Posted February 8, 2012 Report Share Posted February 8, 2012 [quote name='Evil Tristan' timestamp='1328727765' post='5804681'] WHY do you want to get rid of Skill Drain? Without it you may as well scrap the entire deck. [/quote] He said he kept Balbaros for Skill Drain But he can definitely take away Balbaros without Skill Drain, like for Whangu (as pit said) EDIT: To be honest, I wasn't even sure of the deck type it was trying to be xD That explains it :'o tho Balbaros is kewl to have, then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Βyakuya Posted February 8, 2012 Report Share Posted February 8, 2012 Alright, here's what the deck looks like now: [img]http://i.imgur.com/NINzG.jpg[/img] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Account is Unplayable Posted February 8, 2012 Report Share Posted February 8, 2012 Would personally suggest -3 Barbaros for 3 Dualities. Realised I forgot that earlier, I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Βyakuya Posted February 8, 2012 Report Share Posted February 8, 2012 [quote name='Evil Tristan' timestamp='1328728318' post='5804690'] Would personally suggest -3 Barbaros for 3 Dualities. Realised I forgot that earlier, I think. [/quote] Oh that's great. EDIT: So far it's doing very well, its only issue is DWs so far, but it's fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DL Posted February 8, 2012 Report Share Posted February 8, 2012 ...3 pot of duality is a good idea? O-o ..well, I guess that deck really DOESN'T ss much :'o Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Account is Unplayable Posted February 8, 2012 Report Share Posted February 8, 2012 The only monsters that special summon in the deck are the Tengus and the Strikers. But T.G.s never NEED to special summon to control the board, and they like being able to pick and choose their cards, Duality is an absolute must @3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.