Gravitize Me Cap'n! Posted April 3, 2008 Author Report Share Posted April 3, 2008 Then for upcoming banlist -1 Gate Guardian+1 Millennium Shield Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted April 3, 2008 Report Share Posted April 3, 2008 Then for upcoming banlist -1 Gate Guardian+1 Millennium ShieldGreat Job! Now will I not only lose my UFOroid deck, but I'll lose my Millenium Shield deck, too! I hope you feel happy :x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted April 3, 2008 Report Share Posted April 3, 2008 How will my DNA Surgery + Machine Duplication + Millennium Shield + Shield and Sword + Delta Attacker OTK work now that you'll get Millennium Shield Limited? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gravitize Me Cap'n! Posted April 3, 2008 Author Report Share Posted April 3, 2008 How will my DNA Surgery + Machine Duplication + Millennium Shield + Shield and Sword + Delta Attacker OTK work now that you'll get Millennium Shield Limited? Doesn't affect me, I only run one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted April 3, 2008 Report Share Posted April 3, 2008 ok so seriously is this a REAL deck? as in a playable one and we just havnt figured it out yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Umbra Posted April 3, 2008 Report Share Posted April 3, 2008 We should not underestimate the possibility of completely stupid looking decks turning out semi-playable. There was an earlier thread by Crab Helmet in which half the forum (including me) made fools of themselves. But that deck actually had a point. Stack Red-Eyes Metal and Metalzoa into the Grave, and get out Chimeratech. The monsters are used because they are nomi, and can't be summoned by the opponent. (My opinion; correct me if I'm wrong.) But this is just a stack of worthless cards that don't combo. He put Bonding - H2O in, without Water Dragon or any of the Geddons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted April 3, 2008 Report Share Posted April 3, 2008 The monsters are used because they are nomi' date=' and can't be summoned by the opponent. (My opinion; correct me if I'm wrong.)[/quote'] You're wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bfmvrocks Posted April 4, 2008 Report Share Posted April 4, 2008 Please, just explain the Deck, or maybe this thread was just a joke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
legolover09 Posted April 4, 2008 Report Share Posted April 4, 2008 this deck is stupid. it will never work. posibility of you winning: 0.0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001% Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gravitize Me Cap'n! Posted April 4, 2008 Author Report Share Posted April 4, 2008 You're wrong. That percentage is slightly higher than my losing %. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Umbra Posted April 4, 2008 Report Share Posted April 4, 2008 @Crab Helmet: Then please explain to me the reason of putting possibly the two worst monsters (except for the extremely good reason that you found there that pretty much only you could find out) in the TCG in that deck. I asked you to, even in my first post in this thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
legolover09 Posted April 4, 2008 Report Share Posted April 4, 2008 then EXPLAIN your DECK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarbleZone Posted April 4, 2008 Report Share Posted April 4, 2008 @ Umbra: It's explained in his thread. I believe The Dark One figured it out at some point. If I remember correctly, REBMD and Metalzoa were there to be sent to the Graveyard after coming out via Reasoning and Monster Gate, or eventually discarded for Trade-In. I could be wrong since I don't even remember the decklist.Anyway, we should focus on this deck now, which is a perfect counter for everything in the game right now except E-Heroes, which could give this one some problems with their massive fusions and a teched Winged Kuriboh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gravitize Me Cap'n! Posted April 4, 2008 Author Report Share Posted April 4, 2008 @Crab Helmet: Then please explain to me the reason of putting possibly the two worst monsters (except for the extremely good reason that you found there that pretty much only you could find out) in the TCG in that deck. I asked you to' date=' even in my first post in this thread.[/quote'] Which two "worst monsters"? This deck uses nothing but the best, and it's rather demeaning of you to think it's just random junk. Every card serves a purpose, there's a reason I run 2 Gate Guardian instead of 1. Play the deck and figure it out like Crab; stop theorycrafting. Even though it's a last format deck made to counter the Monarch meta, it's faring rather well against DAD/DDT as well. then EXPLAIN your DECK No, you explain yours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Draco Straybyrn Posted April 4, 2008 Report Share Posted April 4, 2008 HAHAH. I figgered it out. ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Von Findlay Posted April 4, 2008 Report Share Posted April 4, 2008 please share :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abstract [Atrocity] Posted April 4, 2008 Report Share Posted April 4, 2008 Ah, I think I get it now. Nice job :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Draco Straybyrn Posted April 4, 2008 Report Share Posted April 4, 2008 Ah' date=' I think I get it now. Nice job :D[/quote'] If you're complimenting him, you don't get it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abstract [Atrocity] Posted April 5, 2008 Report Share Posted April 5, 2008 Or maybe I could be complementing him on what he's done, and not the deck itself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gravitize Me Cap'n! Posted April 5, 2008 Author Report Share Posted April 5, 2008 It's built with speed in mind, maximizing draw efficiency as well as certain anti-meta tech picks to ensure consistency. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Draco Straybyrn Posted April 5, 2008 Report Share Posted April 5, 2008 It's built with speed in mind' date=' maximizing draw efficiency as well as certain anti-meta tech picks to ensure consistency.[/quote'] It's the PERFECT deck, and should be played at any SJC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gravitize Me Cap'n! Posted April 5, 2008 Author Report Share Posted April 5, 2008 Not quite perfect, sometimes I encounter dead draws, which is why I need a few fixes to minimize these draws. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Draco Straybyrn Posted April 5, 2008 Report Share Posted April 5, 2008 Not quite perfect' date=' sometimes I encounter dead draws, which is why I need a few fixes to minimize these draws.[/quote'] + Jar Robber Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gravitize Me Cap'n! Posted April 5, 2008 Author Report Share Posted April 5, 2008 No. I'm looking for synergy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedSceptile Posted April 5, 2008 Report Share Posted April 5, 2008 Not quite perfect' date=' sometimes I encounter dead draws, which is why I need a few fixes to minimize these draws.[/quote'] + Jar Robber You don't know the deck as well as you think you do if you suggest a horrible fix like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.