burnpsy Posted October 16, 2011 Report Share Posted October 16, 2011 Life Ends Life Spell Pay any amount of life points you want: Your opponent takes damage equal to the amount of life points paid. If your opponent has less than 2000 life points after damage is inflicted: Your opponent's life points become 2000. This card's activation and effect cannot be chained to. You cannot conduct your Battle Phase this turn. Link to comment
Agro Posted October 16, 2011 Report Share Posted October 16, 2011 Death Begets Death Spell This card cannot be chained to. The Match Ends in a Draw. Should be just: If your opponent's life points would drop to 0 (by this card's effect); their life point total becomes 1 instead. But u need a limiter as well i suppose. Link to comment
burnpsy Posted October 16, 2011 Author Report Share Posted October 16, 2011 I'm basically trying to stop people from just following this up with a burn spell to win. Link to comment
Agro Posted October 16, 2011 Report Share Posted October 16, 2011 [quote name='burnpsy' timestamp='1318724762' post='5581978'] I'm basically trying to stop people from just following this up with a burn spell to win. [/quote] But then you can never finish them off. It needs a limit to how much damage it can cause. Maybe a maximum of 2000? Link to comment
burnpsy Posted October 16, 2011 Author Report Share Posted October 16, 2011 I'm sure there isn't a problem with just having a waiting period before inflicting more damage. Making this inflict 2000 at most would basically dumb it down to "pay 4000 to inflict 2000", which is terrible, since it's really easy to inflict 2000 without paying that much. Link to comment
Agro Posted October 16, 2011 Report Share Posted October 16, 2011 [quote name='burnpsy' timestamp='1318724905' post='5581984'] I'm sure there isn't a problem with just having a waiting period before inflicting more damage. Making this inflict 2000 at most would basically dumb it down to "pay 4000 to inflict 2000", which is terrible, since it's really easy to inflict 2000 without paying that much. [/quote] And you'd rather pay 8000 to inflict 4000? Link to comment
burnpsy Posted October 16, 2011 Author Report Share Posted October 16, 2011 Think bigger. An infinite LP deck paying 15998 to inflict 7999. Link to comment
Agro Posted October 16, 2011 Report Share Posted October 16, 2011 [quote name='burnpsy' timestamp='1318725273' post='5582002'] Think bigger. An infinite LP deck paying 15998 to inflict 7999. [/quote] Card has officially been forbidden. Congratulations are in order. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wDajqW561KM Link to comment
burnpsy Posted October 16, 2011 Author Report Share Posted October 16, 2011 And that is a good point. So now, I need to figure out how to make it balanced by usable. I could remove the part where you inflict half, just inflicting the amount you paid. I also need a way to prevent the life gain stupidity. Thoughts? Link to comment
Agro Posted October 16, 2011 Report Share Posted October 16, 2011 [quote name='burnpsy' timestamp='1318735587' post='5582497'] And that is a good point. So now, I need to figure out how to make it balanced by usable. I could remove the part where you inflict half, just inflicting the amount you paid. I also need a way to prevent the life gain stupidity. Thoughts? [/quote] Just limit the amount of damage you can give, and the amount that the opponent must have left after the effect is activated. Link to comment
burnpsy Posted October 16, 2011 Author Report Share Posted October 16, 2011 Hmm... That makes sense. I'll make it so the opponent must have at least 2000 LP left after the effect is used. Link to comment
Dementuo Posted October 16, 2011 Report Share Posted October 16, 2011 "You cannot activate this card if your Life Points are 3000 higher than your opponent's Life Points. You cannot activate other cards in the same chain as this card. You cannot conduct your Battle Phase in the same turn you activate this card." Make it a Normal spell, and it becomes usable. Link to comment
burnpsy Posted October 17, 2011 Author Report Share Posted October 17, 2011 Putting in that first restriction along with the other two and what's already there would be way too restrictive to be practical. Other edits made. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.